Oakwood

[Unregistered]

CFC will win a ton of games in the state of CT because they will have 88% of all the players. But it stops there. That’s it, no need to say more.

No one cares about the branch teams - it's all about CFCU.

[Unregistered]

CFC OW should be a regular affair. Games would be very good and egos aside both clubs benefit from playing strong competition. For the most part CFC players are NH and Fairfield county. OW is Hartford focused. Not really targeting the same kids. OW just needs to drop the whole no high school nonsense, clearly not working

As far as the club matches, 2002 was the best team in CFC’s history and 2004 isn’t far off. After that the games would be close.

lol sure they would be.

I agree the target markets don't overlap much but they do overlap. By HS ages parents are much more willing to travel longer for the right opportunities. Some OW players have left for CFCU. One thing that helps OW is that FSA is so bad so if kids can't do CFC then they're more likely to stay.

Regardless it's still a bad look for either club if they lose a game. It always brings out the trash talkers. See: this weekend's game.

[Unregistered]

CFC only plays one league game in state and that’s against FSA. For the team you are talking about, they win the majority of their games including FSA.

How about you not saying more, as you clearly have no clue.

Sorry to shatter the illusion that you had something elite going there. Go sell some raffle tickets and STFU

You really set the bar low with FSA .... and, on average, they only win slightly more than FSA. Take out 2001 and 2002 teams and CFC is only a hair better.

[Unregistered]

CFC OW should be a regular affair. Games would be very good and egos aside both clubs benefit from playing strong competition. For the most part CFC players are NH and Fairfield county. OW is Hartford focused. Not really targeting the same kids. OW just needs to drop the whole no high school nonsense, clearly not working

As far as the club matches, 2002 was the best team in CFC’s history and 2004 isn’t far off. After that the games would be close.

Funny how when OW needs quality opponents, this game has to be played but when they were GDA and going into GA, screw the world, we are the top dogs because RD says so ... only way to D1 and the USNT ... right Rick?

[Unregistered]

Funny how when OW needs quality opponents, this game has to be played but when they were GDA and going into GA, screw the world, we are the top dogs because RD says so ... only way to D1 and the USNT ... right Rick?

rick is clueless with what the girls program needs at ow. last time anyone heard from rick was last June when he was trying to get checks / commitments for this season

[Unregistered]

rick is clueless with what the girls program needs at ow. last time anyone heard from rick was last June when he was trying to get checks / commitments for this season

He's an arrogant, little gnome.

[Unregistered]

You really set the bar low with FSA .... and, on average, they only win slightly more than FSA. Take out 2001 and 2002 teams and CFC is only a hair better.

That gets said every year dude but never plays out in the results. Definitely doesnt play out in college placements.

Good news is that we don't have to debate it here!

[Unregistered]

That gets said every year dude but never plays out in the results. Definitely doesnt play out in college placements.

Good news is that we don't have to debate it here!

Nah, ECNL FSA girls U18s, U16s, U15s better than CFC.

[Unregistered]

Nah, ECNL FSA girls U18s, U16s, U15s better than CFC.

Is “razor thin” guy back??

[Unregistered]

Is “razor thin” guy back??

His kid has to be a senior by now. Typically gets ramped up this time of year. Took last year off with everyone in lockdown. I thought he actually ate some humble pie in 2019 when FSA failed to win an ECNL game against CFC at any age. Either way he gets points for sticking to his narrative!

[Unregistered]

His kid has to be a senior by now. Typically gets ramped up this time of year. Took last year off with everyone in lockdown. I thought he actually ate some humble pie in 2019 when FSA failed to win an ECNL game against CFC at any age. Either way he gets points for sticking to his narrative!

I wonder if his is committed to Endicott or Merimack? http://www.fsafcunited.com/Page.asp?...rg=fsafcunited

[Unregistered]

That gets said every year dude but never plays out in the results. Definitely doesnt play out in college placements.

Good news is that we don't have to debate it here!

2019-20 Standings:

U13:
CFC 5-3-1 (+1 GD) and FSA 2-5-0 (-8 GD)

U14:
CFC 1-7-1 (-16) and FSA 2-4-1 (-6)

U15:
CFC 1-0-1 (+1) and FSA 0-2-1 (-3)

U16:
CFC 0-2-0 (-3) and FSA 0-2-0 (-4)

U17:
CFC 1-1-0 (-1) and FSA 1-1-0 (-3)

U18/19:
CFC 2-0-0 (+8) and FSA 1-1-0 (+0)

Only the 2001/2002 U18/19 team would have probably proven drastically different. Both clubs are awful. End of story.

[Unregistered]

2019-20 Standings:

U13:
CFC 5-3-1 (+1 GD) and FSA 2-5-0 (-8 GD)

U14:
CFC 1-7-1 (-16) and FSA 2-4-1 (-6)

U15:
CFC 1-0-1 (+1) and FSA 0-2-1 (-3)

U16:
CFC 0-2-0 (-3) and FSA 0-2-0 (-4)

U17:
CFC 1-1-0 (-1) and FSA 1-1-0 (-3)

U18/19:
CFC 2-0-0 (+8) and FSA 1-1-0 (+0)

Only the 2001/2002 U18/19 team would have probably proven drastically different. Both clubs are awful. End of story.

Are you really basing your argument on a 2 game season and expect to be taken seriously??

[Unregistered]

Are you really basing your argument on a 2 game season and expect to be taken seriously??

Yes, Mr Razor Thin really is that dumb.

[Unregistered]

Are you really basing your argument on a 2 game season and expect to be taken seriously??

That was the latest standings I could find .... its the same every year when you exclude the CFC 2001 and 2002s.