Oakwood

[Unregistered]

Oakwood did a great job of fouling.

[Unregistered]

Oakwood did a great job of fouling.

And kicking out the sidelines and booting it very high in the air randomly.

[Unregistered]

And kicking out the sidelines and booting it very high in the air randomly.

This was both teams. Too be fair, I thought OW did a better job of trying to organize something/anything resembling offensive cohesion. CFC just plays random balls and capitalizes on misplayed bounces.

[Unregistered]

There is a YouTube video. It was streamed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNLCXfFitFs
Anyone else find it amusing that they spend so much to out in a cover for the stands and 20 foot camera tower and then record on a cell phone?
Watched for a few minutes ... OW Never approached midfield without a boot and CFC found it hard to score with 8 white jerseys in the box .... OW reminded me of FSA.

[Unregistered]

This was both teams. Too be fair, I thought OW did a better job of trying to organize something/anything resembling offensive cohesion. CFC just plays random balls and capitalizes on misplayed bounces.

Not sure we were watching the same game. Unless the many, many fouls by OW is that offensive cohesion you’re referring too. Sloppy and blatant.

[Unregistered]

This was both teams. Too be fair, I thought OW did a better job of trying to organize something/anything resembling offensive cohesion. CFC just plays random balls and capitalizes on misplayed bounces.

Ha, misplaced bounces, that's funny, is that the terminology they use in GAL. OW was booting in panic, CFC was passing long, big difference. There was zero organizing anything with OW in that game. Given OW's performance in their two 2004 games against ECNL OW would be in bottom of the ECNL standings if not last. GA is a joke.

[Unregistered]

Ha, misplaced bounces, that's funny, is that the terminology they use in GAL. OW was booting in panic, CFC was passing long, big difference. There was zero organizing anything with OW in that game. Given OW's performance in their two 2004 games against ECNL OW would be in bottom of the ECNL standings if not last. GA is a joke.

CFC is a bottom feeder in ECNL, I guess beating OW is a silver lining for CFC.

2007 CFC destroys OW
2006 CFC and OW both bad - tie game
2005 OW destroys CFC by 5 + goals
2004 CFC beats them every time
2003 both sub par

CFC has better athletes but OW is a better environment for girls soccer.

Unfortunately for OW they will no longer get the best kids coming from other premier clubs. Not sure how they can maintain any level of competition at 2006 and below.

Fortunately for CFC they will get all the best kids coming up from the youngers. Unfortunately for the players they will be taught how to play physical and that’s pretty much it.

If they were smart they would put MN in charge of a curriculum and implement from youngers all the way up.

[Unregistered]

CFC is a bottom feeder in ECNL, I guess beating OW is a silver lining for CFC.

2007 CFC destroys OW
2006 CFC and OW both bad - tie game
2005 OW destroys CFC by 5 + goals
2004 CFC beats them every time
2003 both sub par

CFC has better athletes but OW is a better environment for girls soccer.

Unfortunately for OW they will no longer get the best kids coming from other premier clubs. Not sure how they can maintain any level of competition at 2006 and below.

Fortunately for CFC they will get all the best kids coming up from the youngers. Unfortunately for the players they will be taught how to play physical and that’s pretty much it.

If they were smart they would put MN in charge of a curriculum and implement from youngers all the way up.

Ha, ha, ha, ok OW 2005 dad. OW 05s are weak. They can't even reach top tier in GAL standings like OW's 04s. CFC 05 would crush OW 05s.

[Unregistered]

CFC is a bottom feeder in ECNL, I guess beating OW is a silver lining for CFC.

2007 CFC destroys OW
2006 CFC and OW both bad - tie game
2005 OW destroys CFC by 5 + goals
2004 CFC beats them every time
2003 both sub par

CFC has better athletes but OW is a better environment for girls soccer.

Unfortunately for OW they will no longer get the best kids coming from other premier clubs. Not sure how they can maintain any level of competition at 2006 and below.

Fortunately for CFC they will get all the best kids coming up from the youngers. Unfortunately for the players they will be taught how to play physical and that’s pretty much it.

If they were smart they would put MN in charge of a curriculum and implement from youngers all the way up.

OW is a terrible environment for girls soccer. Not saying CFC is better; but OW is not this nirvana people make it out to be. Extremely overrated at all levels.

[Unregistered]

OW is a terrible environment for girls soccer. Not saying CFC is better; but OW is not this nirvana people make it out to be. Extremely overrated at all levels.

smells like teen spirit

[Unregistered]

OW is a terrible environment for girls soccer. Not saying CFC is better; but OW is not this nirvana people make it out to be. Extremely overrated at all levels.

OW is a boys clubs with girls teams. CFC is a girls club with boys teams. There’s a reason these clubs don’t play often, it’s not worth the bad PR.

At least CFC and FSA play in the same league. You’ll always get a few FSA parent spouting off off but then it dies down in May after the CFC sweep.

At least OW can claim superior exterior illumination

[Unregistered]

OW is a boys clubs with girls teams. CFC is a girls club with boys teams. There’s a reason these clubs don’t play often, it’s not worth the bad PR.

At least CFC and FSA play in the same league. You’ll always get a few FSA parent spouting off off but then it dies down in May after the CFC sweep.

At least OW can claim superior exterior illumination

CFC will win a ton of games in the state of CT because they will have 88% of all the players. But it stops there. That’s it, no need to say more.

[Unregistered]

CFC will win a ton of games in the state of CT because they will have 88% of all the players. But it stops there. That’s it, no need to say more.

CFC only plays one league game in state and that’s against FSA. For the team you are talking about, they win the majority of their games including FSA.

How about you not saying more, as you clearly have no clue.

Sorry to shatter the illusion that you had something elite going there. Go sell some raffle tickets and STFU

[Unregistered]

CFC only plays one league game in state and that’s against FSA. For the team you are talking about, they win the majority of their games including FSA.

How about you not saying more, as you clearly have no clue.

Sorry to shatter the illusion that you had something elite going there. Go sell some raffle tickets and STFU

Look at pops here throwing the high cheese on girls club soccer. Chacun à son goût.

[Unregistered]

CFC OW should be a regular affair. Games would be very good and egos aside both clubs benefit from playing strong competition. For the most part CFC players are NH and Fairfield county. OW is Hartford focused. Not really targeting the same kids. OW just needs to drop the whole no high school nonsense, clearly not working

As far as the club matches, 2002 was the best team in CFC’s history and 2004 isn’t far off. After that the games would be close.