BS is BS

[Unregistered]

That division is at the U-18/19 level, the amount of MLS teams we play this year is no different than last year.

So much talk about all this tier set up, its only set up that way right now at the oldest DA level.

For now, its all the same, and we STILL play NYSC first .... after they take all our players that NYCFC don't take.

Just not fair, thats all I'm saying.

Just not fair? Maybe you should re-evaluate why you're with a club run by a con man.

[Unregistered]

That division is at the U-18/19 level, the amount of MLS teams we play this year is no different than last year.

So much talk about all this tier set up, its only set up that way right now at the oldest DA level.

For now, its all the same, and we STILL play NYSC first .... after they take all our players that NYCFC don't take.

Just not fair, thats all I'm saying.

The formal segmenting is at the 18/19 level but at lower level it’s being done through scheduling.

[Unregistered]

That division is at the U-18/19 level, the amount of MLS teams we play this year is no different than last year.

So much talk about all this tier set up, its only set up that way right now at the oldest DA level.

For now, its all the same, and we STILL play NYSC first .... after they take all our players that NYCFC don't take.

Just not fair, thats all I'm saying.

Don’t count the MLS teams you play but the number of times you play said teams. In past years BS would play the MLS teams in more games

[Unregistered]

The formal segmenting is at the 18/19 level but at lower level it’s being done through scheduling.

Bingo. There's a very clear message being sent by USSF. Either they expand this further next year or MLS still leaves and does their own thing - both scenarios are bad news for clubs like BS.

[Unregistered]

USSDA schedule

Bingo. There's a very clear message being sent by USSF. Either they expand this further next year or MLS still leaves and does their own thing - both scenarios are bad news for clubs like BS.

Looking at most of the clubs, seems like not all got their MLS games reduced, but Beachside did.

[Unregistered]

Looking at most of the clubs, seems like not all got their MLS games reduced, but Beachside did.

I read somewhere that OW did as well, like at least half as many. USSF is doing what it can to keep MLS clubs in the league, from going to two tiers (one year trial) to reducing games with lower quality teams. In reality DA is too big for a league that's supposed to be "the best" league in the country. MLS clubs know it and they want changes so their players aren't wasting time beating up on Seacoast et al

[Unregistered]

Nysc

Looks like NYSC didn't get a reduction of MLS games. Still play NYCFC and Revs and Montreal same amount.

Obviously not at U18/19.

[Unregistered]

Looks like NYSC didn't get a reduction of MLS games. Still play NYCFC and Revs and Montreal same amount.

Obviously not at U18/19.

NYSC is more deeply connected to USSF.
CG is highly regarded by USSF.
MK is not.

[Unregistered]

NYSC is more deeply connected to USSF.
CG is highly regarded by USSF.
MK is not.

and go figure, NYSC is investing in their program. BS not so much.

[Unregistered]

Is it true CM resigned as president of BS not-for-profit entity?

[Unregistered]

Is it true CM resigned as president of BS not-for-profit entity?

Don’t think so...

https://beachsidesoccer.org/our-story/governance/

[Unregistered]

Don’t think so...

https://beachsidesoccer.org/our-story/governance/

They're not always prompt on updating their website

[Unregistered]

They're not always prompt on updating their website

Probably some new leadership is called for.

The club has had a difficult few years under CMs guidance:

1) Could not secure a home facility
2) Girls program flopped - tried unsuccessfully to gain GDA status. Ultimately disbanded.
3) Getting relegated to Tier II status in boy DA (U18/19)
4) Inability to retain top players
5) Poor public relations, and reputation.
6) Still primarily pay-to-play....

[Unregistered]

Probably some new leadership is called for.

The club has had a difficult few years under CMs guidance:

1) Could not secure a home facility
2) Girls program flopped - tried unsuccessfully to gain GDA status. Ultimately disbanded.
3) Getting relegated to Tier II status in boy DA (U18/19)
4) Inability to retain top players
5) Poor public relations, and reputation.
6) Still primarily pay-to-play....

You forgot a couple.
-Founder and Director of coaching sanction by USSF
-Financial Investgation
-Long time Coaches leaving for other opportunities and DAP programs
-Loss of access to fields

[Unregistered]

BS is BS

5038 replies, focusing on Beachside is BS
280,500 views, focused on Beachside being BS

All in 17 months.


Think about that for a second, and ponder what the REAL problems are with the club. Their brand is ruined.