Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    I have to say I get along well with people of color as well. Maybe since I grew up poor I can relate to the kind of crap they take.

    We regularly stayed at a particuLar city hotel when son was playing college soccer. Ot iced that the same people of color at desk who made me feel welcome....typically calling me "hon" and things like that....I noticed them being slightly officious and nOt exactly offering all cooperation they could to similarly white, middle aged men who projected a certain attitude.

    I loved it.....once got a king rather than double immediately after same was refused to a guy who was a privileged acting jerk.

    More of this I say!

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Can Supermarkets sell hard liquor?
      Extensive selection at mt auburn star market where i shopped when we lived in Cambridge. Are they breaking law?

      Get your facts straight before you blurt out. Yes it's nuanced but can't you make clear and clean arguments by sticking g to relevant examples?

      So dumb. So quick to rise only to be slapped down time and time again

      Comment


        When can I expect the reports from the Court Dockets?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          I don't have the time, and this thread would go on for days if I listed mine. I have posted one or two to get your attention, but with know it all Progressives, their lack of experience never seems to make a difference. They just know it all.

          Have fun on stage.
          You've been posting to this forum like you've had diarrhea of the keyboard for a decade.why spare us now? Go ahead, list all your accomplishments oh high and mighty one! Given how you reject all people who are credentialed in other fields, why would we do anything but BOW down to your.

          Here's a thought question con.....see how you do.

          When you are told what scientists belwive and prescribe about global warming, it's reject reject reject based in following arguments:

          1) serving and perpetuating their own "guild" and aren't o je time as a result.

          2) a small percentage don't agree with near universally held opinion, so jump ball.

          So con, tell us why we should accept the anecdotal view of a law enforcement officer (not sure you even ri g that qualificTion up) as being correct? There is certainly more difference of opinion about police practices across law enforcement than there are over global warming, correct? I mean cops in DOJ just had a lot to say about one of their sister forces. I'm also sure you see how principals In a field are susceptible to same self-perpetuating biases you accuse scientists of.

          Sucks when you cry Wolf so long you see to your own undoing?

          So u til you can explain why YOUR opinion on law enforcement is more credible than mine on all things scientific.....or cujo's in an area where he clearly brought forward your experience, you just sit here and wrestle with that quandary while we rightfully laugh T you every time you stamp your feet and DEMAND to be listened to.

          Tee hee

          Bwah haha

          And with that have a good day people. Going to see a hippie hall of fame at Davis sq theAter tonight. This music in your wheelhouse Cujo?

          Interesting the the non-cons seem to have deeper appreciations for Arts as well as sciences. Sometimes I think being a con is a. Lack and white life like the beginning of that movie "Pleasantville"

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            When can I expect the reports from the Court Dockets?
            Look up. You are having your head handed to you here today. Some of the posts have boxed you I to a corner and people will be laughing at YOU when they read them.

            Con advice:

            Look at whT scientists say with a jaundiced eye but listen to every draconian prescription a beat cop or lower has about our criminal justice system, lawyers, judges, and others need not apply based on what we've heard.

            Hey con.....some of thise lawyers you dismiss are prosecutors who've done you cops and awful lot of favors dontcha know.

            Tee hee
            Bwah haha

            It's shoot-fish-in-barrel time. Sometimes cons walk themselves into such dumb positions. What. Maroon.

            Like trump. O ly thing is.

            Listen to me! I. The best! Everyone else a loser!

            Such a five year old. Trump started to crack last night. November long way away.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              When can I expect the reports from the Court Dockets?
              To quote Nancy pelosi..

              Is never soon enough?

              Tee hee Bwah hah

              I don't muddy myself in anecdote world. Big picture guy.

              Btw my state police lt friend doesn't seem to agree with you on much. You outrank him?

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                This is exactly spot on. Argued with the wingers for years that in the real world (not their fever dreams) anyone making claims, assertions, whatever had better be ready to back them up. Of course,msince they generally despise and distrust things like learning and knowledge it isn't surprising that they stamp their feet like a five year old in a tantrum bender.

                When I declared long ago that the civil war was coming for republicans and that they couldn't go on as they were, I also noted they wouldn't go easily. That they would rage in their "death rattle" and be indifferent to the damage to a country they no longer seem to see themselves as part of.

                The "death rattle" is seen in the trump candidacy. They are reveling in the reactions he is getting and run around acting like they are going to win this time (cue 2008 and 2012 and fact that if R's don't keep ose coalition together AND add votes they are doomed. Look at your news this morning. See they didn't want to attack him because they need the haters I. Their coalition. I think some are going to work to hold onto senate and Supreme Court and dump White House. In end I think it might be good night for the Republican Party. Perhaps a "white nationalist" party composed of a 20% minority, mainly centered in red states somim looking forward to living out my days much like previous .....only BETTER

                Take that cons!

                Tee hee
                Bwah hah
                So you too haven't figured out how to use Google either? And liberals say conservatives are ignorant! I say liberals are lazy.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  This is exactly spot on. Argued with the wingers for years that in the real world (not their fever dreams) anyone making claims, assertions, whatever had better be ready to back them up. Of course,msince they generally despise and distrust things like learning and knowledge it isn't surprising that they stamp their feet like a five year old in a tantrum bender.

                  When I declared long ago that the civil war was coming for republicans and that they couldn't go on as they were, I also noted they wouldn't go easily. That they would rage in their "death rattle" and be indifferent to the damage to a country they no longer seem to see themselves as part of.

                  The "death rattle" is seen in the trump candidacy. They are reveling in the reactions he is getting and run around acting like they are going to win this time (cue 2008 and 2012 and fact that if R's don't keep ose coalition together AND add votes they are doomed. Look at your news this morning. See they didn't want to attack him because they need the haters I. Their coalition. I think some are going to work to hold onto senate and Supreme Court and dump White House. In end I think it might be good night for the Republican Party. Perhaps a "white nationalist" party composed of a 20% minority, mainly centered in red states somim looking forward to living out my days much like previous .....only BETTER

                  Take that cons!

                  Tee hee
                  Bwah hah
                  And hypocrites too. Where's your sources?

                  Bwahahahaha!!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Mass incarceration myth? Like the two republican judges in PA who filled the juvenile prison to get kickbacks from the private prison company THEY handed their county's business to?

                    This is a myth? Private prisons are the republican model.

                    This is like trump de ting the legal stuff last night. Children. Be calm folks. We are winning!
                    Where's your sources?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Wrong. We want people who received 20 year jail sentences for possession of 18 joints to be freed. The police and courts have disproportionately let whites off for drug possession. How much time did Bill Belichiks kid serve for possession? Now if it was a black kid from Roxbury? Different story. We will never solve the race problem in this country until the deniers take their blinders off and admit won't most Americans understand.

                      - Cujo
                      That's one of the myths liberals put out there. No one goes to jail for just marijuana possession. There aren’t enough police officers to enforce marijuana possession laws. The only time someone is sentenced to jail for smoking pot is if there is a more serious crime they are clearly guilty. Theft or burglary were the most common crimes. Ironically, possession can be used to the defendant’s advantage to get a lighter sentence. The vast majority of the defendants have a long rap sheets; pages and pages of criminal history. Much of it is not permitted to be disclosed to the judge, because it was considered inadmissible; things like arrests with no conviction, dismissals, juvenile crimes, convictions older than the statute of limitations, etc. Many defendants had been arrested 10 to 20 times and it was clear they had a pattern of theft or other crimes — and generally caught with drugs every time — but the outcome was always the same, they were allowed to plead guilty to some lesser crime and often escape any jail time.*

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        That's one of the myths liberals put out there. No one goes to jail for just marijuana possession. There aren’t enough police officers to enforce marijuana possession laws. The only time someone is sentenced to jail for smoking pot is if there is a more serious crime they are clearly guilty. Theft or burglary were the most common crimes. Ironically, possession can be used to the defendant’s advantage to get a lighter sentence. The vast majority of the defendants have a long rap sheets; pages and pages of criminal history. Much of it is not permitted to be disclosed to the judge, because it was considered inadmissible; things like arrests with no conviction, dismissals, juvenile crimes, convictions older than the statute of limitations, etc. Many defendants had been arrested 10 to 20 times and it was clear they had a pattern of theft or other crimes — and generally caught with drugs every time — but the outcome was always the same, they were allowed to plead guilty to some lesser crime and often escape any jail time.*
                        Progressives are lazy. A simple task to go to the Courthouse and write down the names on the Docket , and look up their history. Simple. Still not convinced? Do it every day for a week, a month.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          That's one of the myths liberals put out there. No one goes to jail for just marijuana possession. There aren’t enough police officers to enforce marijuana possession laws. The only time someone is sentenced to jail for smoking pot is if there is a more serious crime they are clearly guilty. Theft or burglary were the most common crimes. Ironically, possession can be used to the defendant’s advantage to get a lighter sentence. The vast majority of the defendants have a long rap sheets; pages and pages of criminal history. Much of it is not permitted to be disclosed to the judge, because it was considered inadmissible; things like arrests with no conviction, dismissals, juvenile crimes, convictions older than the statute of limitations, etc. Many defendants had been arrested 10 to 20 times and it was clear they had a pattern of theft or other crimes — and generally caught with drugs every time — but the outcome was always the same, they were allowed to plead guilty to some lesser crime and often escape any jail time.*
                          I k ow how tomuse the Google.

                          Are you Rachel alexander or did you just crib that piece from Rachel alexander who us a "conservative" editor at the conservative journal townhall.org

                          Is she you source for all this? I thought you were an "expert"? As such shouldn't you have access to primary sources in your field, cite them, and be able to weave a narrative in your own words rather than stolen ones?

                          Have to stop now.....starting to feel like this con is a lower form of life than many other humans. Goi g to move on bring my humanistic side forward and realize that we all did t start with same gifts and I can't fault him for his lack of intellectual horsepower

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Progressives are lazy. A simple task to go to the Courthouse and write down the names on the Docket , and look up their history. Simple. Still not convinced? Do it every day for a week, a month.
                            Is that like when businesses exploit the bankruptcy laws they do it again and again = recidivism? What Bout banks who violate same laws over and over and NEVER see heir people in jail.

                            When you are ready to talk. Iut. It accepting recidivism against the. If people talk to me. Till then talk to hand. Recidivism due to FAILED system you and yours have been driving for generations, yes?

                            Time for something new. You are pRt of the status quo right? Status quo not working so you if all people appreciate the Insurge t view and get throw out all incumbents, that would be you con.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              That's one of the myths liberals put out there. No one goes to jail for just marijuana possession. There aren’t enough police officers to enforce marijuana possession laws. The only time someone is sentenced to jail for smoking pot is if there is a more serious crime they are clearly guilty. Theft or burglary were the most common crimes. Ironically, possession can be used to the defendant’s advantage to get a lighter sentence. The vast majority of the defendants have a long rap sheets; pages and pages of criminal history. Much of it is not permitted to be disclosed to the judge, because it was considered inadmissible; things like arrests with no conviction, dismissals, juvenile crimes, convictions older than the statute of limitations, etc. Many defendants had been arrested 10 to 20 times and it was clear they had a pattern of theft or other crimes — and generally caught with drugs every time — but the outcome was always the same, they were allowed to plead guilty to some lesser crime and often escape any jail time.*
                              Great day for you. Once again you cleaned tampaxs clock! Man is he a waste of oxygen or what? Those last few posts of his... he has to be about 1/2 pint into it based on the writing .

                              Comment


                                "As a county prosecutor, I came across thousands of criminal cases (I frequently covered multiple hearings in different cases on a daily basis for other prosecutors assigned to those cases). I never saw a single defendant who was really sentenced to jail for marijuana possession." - Rachel Alexander

                                "No first-time offender arrested in California solely for drug possession goes to prison — ever." - Former Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X