Block head, the line was in reference to the deficit chart, the zero point, not the average. Below the line is a deficit, above a surplus. Wow give a crap what the average is.
Failed in math as well as reading comprehension, huh?
Hey Dummy, there's an x-axis (Deficits) and a y-axis (Percentage of GDP).
It helps when the prosecutor is a board member of the Planned Parenthood group that was targeted. Welcome to justice Obama style.
Most of the radical pro life movement believe that God's law as THEY interpret it supersedes laws made by man. They believe that any and all means to prevent abortions are justified. How are they different from radical Muslims? These jerks broke the law and deserve to be given a fair trial, be judged by a jury of their peers and face the consequences of the civil and criminal statutes they violated. There is no scriptural basis for their beliefs. The notion that aborting a pregnancy prior to quickening is entirely a modern notion that followed roe v Wade. If they are so passionate about their beliefs then they should be willing to suffer the consequences of violating the rule of law. Just as Jesus did.
You guys are swinging desperately as the Con hitjob against Planned Parenthood is going up in flames.
Here is what you said earlier...
"It helps when the prosecutor (emphasis added by me) is a board member of the Planned Parenthood group that was targeted. Welcome to justice Obama style."
"The prosecutor" is actually District Attorney Devon Anderson (a Republican, by the way). The prosecutor you tried to suggest was "the prosecutor" is Lauren Reeder, one of 300 attorneys who work under Anderson. Reeder works in the criminal family law division.
So you're suggesting that this lower-level employee who works in a different division, who voluntarily offered her connection to Planned Parenthood, is pulling the strings in the DA's office? lol
You people are ridiculous.
More nutter nonsense. Obama has no influence or relationship with the TX DA. The prosecuter presents a case to a grand jury. This jury returns indictments if there is sufficient evidence. The original case was against PP. Not only did they not send a ham sandwich off to the courts but they indicted a roast beef sandwich. This is a very rare event which simply illustrates how far off the rails these pro lifers have strayed. You really can't make this shizzle up. Rather than acknowledging what has taken place the nutters dig a deeper intellectual hole with their inability to stay in touch with reality. No wonder youth soccer sidelines arevin such chaos. Some of the posters in here should be getting treatment at McLean hospital.
Bush got handed a surplus and he practically crashed world economy.
What are you repubs thinking? Trump could actually do it.
Is there something wrong with you? I said " debt" not Budget. As in " National Debt "
Obama has run up the national Debt , you know the one with the numbers that keep increasing by the minute ?
Is there something wrong with you? I said " debt" not Budget. As in " National Debt "
Obama has run up the national Debt , you know the one with the numbers that keep increasing by the minute ?
The Budget is a different topic.
Is there something wrong with you? Budget? Who has been talking about budgets? Try to stay on topic.
back to the topic...
The debt is an accumulation of the annual deficits.
Georgie boy has the honor of posting the biggest deficit in the history of the country.
Is there something wrong with you? Budget? Who has been talking about budgets? Try to stay on topic.
back to the topic...
The debt is an accumulation of the annual deficits.
Georgie boy has the honor of posting the biggest deficit in the history of the country.
The figures I provided are the run up of the National Debt.
The biggest budget deficit still didn't make Bush the largest contributor to the National Debt. Why is this so difficult to understand ?
Bush, 8 years, $4.9 Trillion ADDED to the national Debt
Obama , 7 years, with one to go, $8.3 Trillion ADDED to the National Debt
See the numbers?
Bush
Obama
Do the math.
And with the opinion that the current budget just passed could add another $ 2 trillion , that would be under Obama. He could be responsible for $ 10.3 trillion when he leaves office.
The figures I provided are the run up of the National Debt.
The biggest budget deficit still didn't make Bush the largest contributor to the National Debt. Why is this so difficult to understand ?
Bush, 8 years, $4.9 Trillion ADDED to the national Debt
Obama , 7 years, with one to go, $8.3 Trillion ADDED to the National Debt
See the numbers?
Bush
Obama
Do the math.
And with the opinion that the current budget just passed could add another $ 2 trillion , that would be under Obama. He could be responsible for $ 10.3 trillion when he leaves office.
And what you are unable to grasp is that after Bush nearly drove this country, and the world, into a Great Depression, you don't just bounce back from that as if nothing happened. That largest-deficit-ever is going to spawn subsequent large deficits.
And what you are unable to grasp is that after Bush nearly drove this country, and the world, into a Great Depression, you don't just bounce back from that as if nothing happened. That largest-deficit-ever is going to spawn subsequent large deficits.
It's not hard to understand.
" driving the country ...into a Great Depression ..." is a matter of opinion . The roots of the collapse can be tracked back to Carter , Regan and Clinton .
The figures are facts.
However the run up in debt by Obama was a tactical decision, that now appears to have been a failure. The trillion dollar " shovel ready " , not ready for prime time " Stimulus" . The huge losses for Government Motors, Clean Energy and Battery bankruptcies , the bread lines masquerading as SNAP...Cash for Clunkers .the list goes on and on.
It is Obama's handiwork that has become the fuel for the Sanders and Trump fire. The 2010 election results tried to reinforce that point, but a stupid group of Republicans have caved to him.
" driving the country ...into a Great Depression ..." is a matter of opinion . The roots of the collapse can be tracked back to Carter , Regan and Clinton .
The figures are facts.
However the run up in debt by Obama was a tactical decision, that now appears to have been a failure. The trillion dollar " shovel ready " , not ready for prime time " Stimulus" . The huge losses for Government Motors, Clean Energy and Battery bankruptcies , the bread lines masquerading as SNAP...Cash for Clunkers .the list goes on and on.
It is Obama's handiwork that has become the fuel for the Sanders and Trump fire. The 2010 election results tried to reinforce that point, but a stupid group of Republicans have caved to him.
If you want to get truthful about this, the seeds were planted on Nov 23, 1963. JFK was going after the Fed. Until the Fed is gone, we will perpetually be in debt.
" driving the country ...into a Great Depression ..." is a matter of opinion . The roots of the collapse can be tracked back to Carter , Regan and Clinton .
The figures are facts.
However the run up in debt by Obama was a tactical decision, that now appears to have been a failure. The trillion dollar " shovel ready " , not ready for prime time " Stimulus" . The huge losses for Government Motors, Clean Energy and Battery bankruptcies , the bread lines masquerading as SNAP...Cash for Clunkers .the list goes on and on.
It is Obama's handiwork that has become the fuel for the Sanders and Trump fire. The 2010 election results tried to reinforce that point, but a stupid group of Republicans have caved to him.
I guess keeping the wars in Iran and Iraq on a credit card (the costs didn't appear in our annual budget....somehow).
bread lines masquerading as SNAP?
I also don't get the sanders trump comparison. One is a sitting US senator with decades of public service and the other is a mass media star loudmouth.
I've never hear a sitting us senator called an outsider before. It's very interesting how folks on the right compare trump with sanders when they want to LEGITIMIZE trump.
Meanwhile, the brave brave man apparently can't face down Megan Kelly. He has a very fragile ego. Not strong. Weak.
If you want to get truthful about this, the seeds were planted on Nov 23, 1963. JFK was going after the Fed. Until the Fed is gone, we will perpetually be in debt.
Not to mention that it is Congress that creates and passes the budget, not the figurehead sitting in the White House.
I've "discussed" these not so nuanced budget deficit items with ex lax for years to no avail. The right (wrongly I might add) wants you to look at us budget like family budget. Let's play for a moment.
Obama walked in as the bush recession was taking off. Eight years before bush had inherited surpluses so whatever went on before bush did not stand in the way of surpluses regardless of the incoherent blubbering and finger pointing to past administrations.
Bush ran up debt and then took us to a recession (I should manage as an aside I believe it's the only time a president managed a recession at a time of war). Is it harder to get your family out of debt when you take a giant pay cut? Because that's what bush did to our national family with his recession. The money flowing into the treasury was way down....because of the RECESSION.
If they never understood it before they won't now. They have to get behind a candidate who is scrambling everything they claim to have ever believed in save for the hate of other. Trump has already committed apostasy on taxes and a number of issues but shockingly (to leaders on the right, not me, I've been saying they are motivated by hate of others for years) trump is showing that right never had any binding philosophical ties.
You also haven't heard anyone talk of tort reform either. I guess it's wrong for the little people to use the courts but the oligarchs like trump use our courts for business purposes and that's fine. He's admitted it. Slap suits.
As long as trump hates the right people enough, none ofmthe stuff that conservatives have harped about for decades matters. But we knew that. We knew that they lacked any kind of coherent organizing ideas.
I guess keeping the wars in Iran and Iraq on a credit card (the costs didn't appear in our annual budget....somehow).
bread lines masquerading as SNAP?
I also don't get the sanders trump comparison. One is a sitting US senator with decades of public service and the other is a mass media star loudmouth.
I've never hear a sitting us senator called an outsider before. It's very interesting how folks on the right compare trump with sanders when they want to LEGITIMIZE trump.
Meanwhile, the brave brave man apparently can't face down Megan Kelly. He has a very fragile ego. Not strong. Weak.
The House of Representatives carries the nation's checkbook. Policies by the President need to have them write the checks. First day in office, the Democrats started looting the Treasury, and the evidence is the run up of the National Debt.
Regardless of what you say about Iraq or any other military action. The checkbook wasn't in Bush's pocket. Whatever was spent STILL did not bring the run up of the debt like Obama has.
Rather than solve a problem, Obama just created another to appease his lefty supporters. He LOWERED the threshold for SNAP participation. Made it available to more people, and 10 million said , sure why not? Money I don't have to work for ? Where do I sign? What's our chances of getting that 10 million off them now? Rather then work to DECREASE the unemployment rate for minorities, he promotes illegals staying here to take jobs away , and the consequences are higher unemployment rates for the minority segment. I guess the newly unemployed have their own " sanctuary " by getting an EBT card instead of a job opportunity.
I didn't say Sanders is an outsider, but he is taking on the miserable state of the country after 7 years of Obama. That's the common thread of Bernie and Donald.
Trump does not need to be " legitimized ". By whom ? Elites? Progressives ? He is legit enough to be leading polls, getting people to show up and see him, and moving the dialogue in directions that run of the mill politicians dare not touch. He is a legit Populist . It is a different side of politics that many people may not be familiar with.
" Fragile ego " ?
He just not see any value in appearing . That is his right. His idea about raising money for Veterans sounds like a good idea. Maybe Hillary can put down the gloves and kick in some of the millions from the Clinton Foundation, maybe the $ 200,000 she picked up from Goldman Sachs while she was masquerading as the Sec of State. I mean, she told a young questioner that she has " ..been fighting since I was your age.. "
Fighting for her and Bill's legacy, for their personal fortune , for her influence to make others rich . etc.
Comment