Originally posted by Guest
View Post
I know of a couple ECRL teams who over rostered. Our take on it is when the parents receive an offer they should be told, your player is a “practice player” ie number 19-22. This player will not be dressing for games and will only dress for games if team has injuries and absent players. This player will however play weekly with team X to continue to grow and develop. This would be clear and transparent. The parents can then reject that offer or accept with full knowledge of the situation. What we have heard is players finding out weekly who made the game day roster and who had to stay home that weekend. Teams don’t gel under that kind of pressure in youth soccer. It adds tension between players and parents. The players are so distracted by who made the game roster they can’t focus on the formations or their own game. Transparency with wording in offers is very important to build trust as well as good business practice.
Comment