Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shift to Jan. 1 cutoff next year or year after?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Bridlemile is having the players practice by birth year.
    Bridlemile is a real club?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Which club? We got one from CFC. Said still waiting on some details from OYSA like 8th-9th grade issue about what league will offer 2002s in fall of 2016.

      Bend, NEU & FCP have all sent out birth year notifications already. Any other clubs communicating?

      The birth year train has left the station.
      Eugene

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Bridlemile is a real club?
        actually Bridelmile has the most top licensed coaches of all clubs in the state.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          actually Bridelmile has the most top licensed coaches of all clubs in the state.
          Keep dreaming. Neighborhood rec+ club if there ever was one.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Keep dreaming. Neighborhood rec+ club if there ever was one.
            Go online for yourself. Compare their coaching credentials to yours. Then you will see what I'm talking about

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              actually Bridelmile has the most top licensed coaches of all clubs in the state.
              Which state are they in?

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Which state are they in?
                If you don't know which state, don't know how to use google and have a kid that plays on a top team then I can't help you.
                It's ok though, your unlicensed coach tells you that licensing isn't important. Keep drinking the cool-aid

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Which state are they in?
                  Idaho I think?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Delaying the inevitable for one year will hurt them long term.
                    Our club is going birth year but our top team isn't. They are just going to stay together and play in the older age group. They might not be a super top team anymore but they will get to stay together and will still develop as players. I don't know what will happen to the players from the current younger age A team or current older team who are mandated to play with the two groups on our team but i guess they will figure something out. Birth year is creating a big mess.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      Our club is going birth year but our top team isn't. They are just going to stay together and play in the older age group. They might not be a super top team anymore but they will get to stay together and will still develop as players. I don't know what will happen to the players from the current younger age A team or current older team who are mandated to play with the two groups on our team but i guess they will figure something out. Birth year is creating a big mess.
                      Would OYSA allow two teams from same club both play Premier? If not, I question whether this desire to keep teams together is feasible or desireable. Wouldn't this club be accepting watered down teams for the sake of keeping this one team together. Which team gets to play premier: the stay together team which is younger or the older team? How would the top players from this stay together group feel if they aren't playing premier?

                      Why do you all care so much about keeping teams together?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        Our club is going birth year but our top team isn't. They are just going to stay together and play in the older age group. They might not be a super top team anymore but they will get to stay together and will still develop as players. I don't know what will happen to the players from the current younger age A team or current older team who are mandated to play with the two groups on our team but i guess they will figure something out. Birth year is creating a big mess.
                        It only becomes a mess when parents/coaches decide to keep teams together like the above example. Otherwise, it's pretty seamless.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Would OYSA allow two teams from same club both play Premier? If not, I question whether this desire to keep teams together is feasible or desireable. Wouldn't this club be accepting watered down teams for the sake of keeping this one team together. Which team gets to play premier: the stay together team which is younger or the older team? How would the top players from this stay together group feel if they aren't playing premier?

                          Why do you all care so much about keeping teams together?
                          If they are from Timbers clubs then maybe. Otherwise, not a chance.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Go online for yourself. Compare their coaching credentials to yours. Then you will see what I'm talking about
                            Don't need to compare credentials. Just have to look at the product on the field. Not much to brag about at BSC. Any good players they have leave for FCP/THUSC/Xfire by U13 anyway.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              It only becomes a mess when parents/coaches decide to keep teams together like the above example. Otherwise, it's pretty seamless.
                              Winner!

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                It only becomes a mess when parents/coaches decide to keep teams together like the above example. Otherwise, it's pretty seamless.
                                It is seamless. We know kids will quit when they can't play with their friends, but that is fine. Good riddance. Anyone that wants to play with their friends, regardless of their talent level, are a burden to the sport.

                                The change will reduce the numbers of kids joining soccer at younger ages but that is ok.

                                The loses of numbers in the 10-20% range over two years will be just fine. Raise fees to offset the lost gross revenue.

                                Look, we are all part of something bigger. Nobody cares that your daughter wants to play with her friends. Go join Girl Scouts or have a tea party. This is soccer. We are here to generate revenue for US soccer and should be pleased to adhere to their mandates that help the US men's team. Anything else is being disloyal and don't let the door hit you.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X