If "Children that qualify for these programs are underprivileged and will be unable to travel to a remote field away from school to play during the 5-7pm evening hours," then we must be talking about children that aren't currently participating in any of the clubs in the coalition. In order to be playing in these clubs, these kids would have to be traveling to remote fields during the 5-7 pm evening hours. How is providing free soccer to kids who aren't currently participating in soccer a threat to these clubs? If these kids aren't able to afford soccer and can't travel to a remote field when they are 5-9 years old, they won't be able to do so when they are 10 either. So they aren't taking any of their existing players, and they aren't taking any of their future players. And they aren't taking any of their existing fields, in spite of what everyone on TS claims. Orlando City received tax money, and in return, they are providing free soccer to kids who otherwise wouldn't be able to play.
What am I missing? How exactly does this program threaten the clubs in the coalition? What is preventing these clubs from offering a similar program on their own? Can't they work out a deal with the schools in their area, provide some volunteer coaches and run a program on their own? They have been around for 40 years, why aren't they already doing this?
What am I missing? How exactly does this program threaten the clubs in the coalition? What is preventing these clubs from offering a similar program on their own? Can't they work out a deal with the schools in their area, provide some volunteer coaches and run a program on their own? They have been around for 40 years, why aren't they already doing this?
Comment