OCYS Consolidated Thread

[Unregistered]

You're right, because last years dream teams faired so much better than this years teams. You are just looking for any excuse to say how much these young ladies suck and try to back up all the bashing that took place at the beginning of the season. Say whatever you want. Last years rankings are not better than this years rankings, and that is just burning your ass isn't it?
Last years standings are as follows:

U18- #7
U17- #7
U16- #2
U15- #8
U14- #9

So, how 'bout them apples?

Also your dream teams flew to away games. Try riding buses for 8 hours and see how they wound have done. You think you had adversity? OC is doing quite well.

[Unregistered]

You're right, because last years dream teams faired so much better than this years teams. You are just looking for any excuse to say how much these young ladies suck and try to back up all the bashing that took place at the beginning of the season. Say whatever you want. Last years rankings are not better than this years rankings, and that is just burning your ass isn't it?
Last years standings are as follows:

U18- #7
U17- #7
U16- #2
U15- #8
U14- #9

So, how 'bout them apples?

You came on here and told how they are doing quite well, then when people show you that they really aren't you try to delfect by going back to last year. I had nothing to do with last years teams, but I was telling you that this years are not doing "quite well" as you put it. I didn't say they suck, but they sure aren't doing good.

[Unregistered]

You're right, because last years dream teams faired so much better than this years teams. You are just looking for any excuse to say how much these young ladies suck and try to back up all the bashing that took place at the beginning of the season. Say whatever you want. Last years rankings are not better than this years rankings, and that is just burning your ass isn't it?
Last years standings are as follows:

U18- #7
U17- #7
U16- #2
U15- #8
U14- #9

So, how 'bout them apples?

Thank you but something to remember is last year for u18 it was first year and most were committed and did not see need for ECNL. The U17 team then was in 2nd or 3rd and then OCYS took over with SC and I don't think they won again. The u16 were very good and FKK did struggle at u15.

This year u18 ladies must play because they aren't committed save a few and nor should they be. Ditto with u17 team face it you are what you are. Despite the influx from Ocala and palm coast you are still struggling. You know all this though.

Is their an age group you would beat FKK? Maybe one so last year vs this year comparisons mean nothing. You got it an ran your mouths about how great you would be since trouble left and results show otherwise. You are doing "ok" but FKK demonstrated a different standard during different trips north. You show nothing but stagnant growth.

[Unregistered]

You're right, because last years dream teams faired so much better than this years teams. You are just looking for any excuse to say how much these young ladies suck and try to back up all the bashing that took place at the beginning of the season. Say whatever you want. Last years rankings are not better than this years rankings, and that is just burning your ass isn't it?
Last years standings are as follows:

U18- #7
U17- #7
U16- #2
U15- #8
U14- #9

So, how 'bout them apples?

We werent talking about 'last year", but since you bring it up, I suppose I could point out a few things:

Last year, those ECNL teams each suffered through 3-5 coaching changes, each time a more poorly qualified idiot than the last. Last year, OC management dind't even know what NLI Day in the US is. Last year, OCYS coaches didn't show up to practices and sometimes even games. Last year, OCYS fired the only guy who had a clue- and the guy who was credited by ECNL Officials as "the reason ECNL is here in Orlando".

THIS year, OCYS brought in the "specialist" it poached from FCA (yes, poached) to turn the ship around. This year we were told- things will be different, things will be great, OCYS will improve, we will get results.

The record is worse, the colleges aren't knocking, The results are nil. I guess we're in for a new round of excuses. How many more years of development are you willing to sacrifice to the English?

[Unregistered]

Also your dream teams flew to away games. Try riding buses for 8 hours and see how they wound have done. You think you had adversity? OC is doing quite well.

We payed for those plane tickets. Hard to believe you're whining about your "free" bus ride. And you compare that to the chaos caused by OCYS last year and think your Mias have "adversity"? You make me laugh.

[Unregistered]

Ignore the OCYS Stalker

[Unregistered]

We payed for those plane tickets.

You're our hero.

[Unregistered]

You show nothing but stagnant growth.

^^^Obviously not a Rhodes Scholar or a rocket scientist.

"stagnant growth"? That's an oxymoron.

Something could be stagnant - or- something could show growth, but - there's no such thing as "stagnant growth".

Idiots, illiterates and morons should stay off Talking Soccer.

[Unregistered]

^^^Obviously not a Rhodes Scholar or a rocket scientist.

"stagnant growth"? That's an oxymoron.

Something could be stagnant - or- something could show growth, but - there's no such thing as "stagnant growth".

Idiots, illiterates and morons should stay off Talking Soccer.

What an idiot....look up adverb in the dictionary.......thats not an oxymoron----you however are just a plain old MORON

[Unregistered]

Idiots and morons on TS

What an idiot....look up adverb in the dictionary.......thats not an oxymoron----you however are just a plain old MORON

Look up adverb in the dictionary? "Stagnant" is an adjective. "Growth" is a noun.

An adverb is a word that changes or qualifies the meaning of a verb, adjective, other adverb, clause, sentence or any other word or phrase, except that it does not include the adjectives and determiners that directly modify nouns.


stag·nant [stag-nuhnt]

adjective

1. not flowing or running, as water, air, etc.

2.stale or foul from standing, as a pool of water.

3. characterized by lack of development, advancement, or progressive movement: a stagnant economy.

4. inactive, sluggish, or dull.

growth [grohth]

noun

1. the act or process, or a manner of growing; development; gradual increase.

2. size or stage of development: It hasn't yet reached its full growth.

3. completed development.

4. development from a simpler to a more complex stage: the growth of ritual forms.

5. development from another but related form or stage: the growth of the nation state.

ox·y·mo·ron

n. pl.ox·y·mo·ra (-môr, -mr) or ox·y·mo·rons

A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in a deafening silence and a mournful optimist.

Combining the term "stagnant" with the term "growth" is incongruous and contradictory.

"stagnant growth" fits the definition of an oxymoron

Now THAT'S how to use a dictionary, you moron.

[Unregistered]

We werent talking about 'last year", but since you bring it up, I suppose I could point out a few things:

Last year, those ECNL teams each suffered through 3-5 coaching changes, each time a more poorly qualified idiot than the last. Last year, OC management dind't even know what NLI Day in the US is. Last year, OCYS coaches didn't show up to practices and sometimes even games. Last year, OCYS fired the only guy who had a clue- and the guy who was credited by ECNL Officials as "the reason ECNL is here in Orlando".

THIS year, OCYS brought in the "specialist" it poached from FCA (yes, poached) to turn the ship around. This year we were told- things will be different, things will be great, OCYS will improve, we will get results.

The record is worse, the colleges aren't knocking, The results are nil. I guess we're in for a new round of excuses. How many more years of development are you willing to sacrifice to the English?

Hold up 3-5 coaching changes? Each worse than the last? Please elaborate because I am certain that when Crane came in JP was already working with the girls as was Varns and if I'm not mistaken they are your current coaches. Boy sure hope they are not on here today to hear your opinion of him. Worse than the last .... Ouch

[Unregistered]

Hold up 3-5 coaching changes? Each worse than the last? Please elaborate because I am certain that when Crane came in JP was already working with the girls as was Varns and if I'm not mistaken they are your current coaches. Boy sure hope they are not on here today to hear your opinion of him. Worse than the last .... Ouch

I don't know of a single coach under the OCYS "system" that shows well. They all leave after finding they aren't allowed to coach at all- just dictate the same old practice-dummy "style of play". No creativity allowed. The results speak for themselves.

[Unregistered]

I don't know of a single coach under the OCYS "system" that shows well. They all leave after finding they aren't allowed to coach at all- just dictate the same old practice-dummy "style of play". No creativity allowed. The results speak for themselves.

Now you're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Again please tell us the 3 to 5 coaches you had during your ECNL season THAT being the reason why the girls didn't perform well. You can't because the coaches you have now are the ones that took over the ECNL program - you had Steve Crane that you were able to get fired but the rest are your current coaches. So flying to games and having a new coach is what your record shows. Bussing to games not practice for a month due to high school agreement is what ours shows. Nothing will ever be perfect. Wait until your star goes to college. To say OC is not fairing well is asinine all you have to do is look at your last years records to now that.

[Unregistered]

I don't know of a single coach under the OCYS "system" that shows well. They all leave after finding they aren't allowed to coach at all- just dictate the same old practice-dummy "style of play". No creativity allowed. The results speak for themselves.

Only a conformist survives under OCYS. Don't expect your child to be developed. If your child is already a stud or been developed elsewhere then he or she may have a chance.

No child starting @ OC from day 1 ( 5-6 Years Old ) has a chance.

Messi would of been cut by OC. Ronaldo would of been told to stop dribbling by OC

[Unregistered]

I don't know of a single coach under the OCYS "system" that shows well. They all leave after finding they aren't allowed to coach at all- just dictate the same old practice-dummy "style of play". No creativity allowed. The results speak for themselves.

Brick shows well but he's a kiss up. Brick pucker's up to Heath like no other.