Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

It’s cute how proud he was of being able to convert to a percentage.

[Unregistered]

Different poster I took it as statement of obvious fact

You would, but regardless, it still was an ad hominen attack

[Unregistered]

I think it extends waay beyond TS. Lol

And, yet, here's another. Hypocrites just can't help themselves.

Tee Hee...gonna call it out?

[Unregistered]

Does Title Con want to take another stab at it?
Bore-is, think you can stand aside and let him stand on his own two feet?

[Unregistered]

It’s cute how proud he was of being able to convert to a percentage.

Kind of like when I taught my cousin with Down's syndrome to tie his own shoes. Bless title Con's heart.

[Unregistered]

You would, but regardless, it still was an ad hominen attack

Is title con using big words now? So sweet. He still has no idea what he's talking about or how do do basic statistics.

[Unregistered]

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks a

Kind of like when I taught my cousin with Down's syndrome to tie his own shoes. Bless title Con's heart.

the figures don't lie and the numbers are what they are...only the deaf, blind and dumb will choose to ignore them (this means you)...its not my fault they don't align with your bs political and fake agenda.

[Unregistered]

Was listening in on Trumps FEMA call with governors. The first couple govs, D and R, made sure to start with the requisite line of flattery as a means to get trumps attention. Who knows what result that will get.

Kristin Noem, Republican gov of SD expressed concern about material shortages and she was cut off abruptly before two other points she wanted to make.

Leadership cult

[Unregistered]

the figures don't lie and the numbers are what they are...only the deaf, blind and dumb will choose to ignore them (this means you)...its not my fault they don't align with your bs political and fake agenda.

Below is a very basic primer about exponential growth. All the measures being taken today are for the purpose of trying decrease this exponential rate of growth of Covid-19.

——————
Whenever you have exponential growth, whatever it is that’s growing will double its presence/population in a given amount of time. Let’s say you start with a population that has just one infected person on January 1st, and the number of infected people doubles every three days.

How many people will be infected by January 31? How many people will be infected by this year’s equinox: March 19?

If the exponential nature of the infection transmission isn’t stemmed in any way, there will be 1024 infected people on January 31: about a thousand times as many as you began with. That’s a lot, but remember that this continues to double every three days as long as this growth remains exponential. On February 3, there will be twice as many: 2048 infected. On February 6, that rises to 4096. By the time you get to March 19, which is 78 days after the initial infection, some 67 million people will be infected.
——————

So....
Here’s an exercise for Title Con...

Part a)
Hypothetically, if 67 million people become infected, what % is that of 327 million?

Part b)
Does the answer from part a) represent your chance of becoming infected. And, if so, why is that figure so different from the .002% you stated earlier?

You have one week to turn in your work. I suspect you’ll need all 7 days.

[Unregistered]

the figures don't lie and the numbers are what they are...only the deaf, blind and dumb will choose to ignore them (this means you)...its not my fault they don't align with your bs political and fake agenda.

Let me ask again since you refused to answer earlier. Should Trump take any blame for our country's response to COVID-19?

[Unregistered]

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks a

Below is a very basic primer about exponential growth. All the measures being taken today are for the purpose of trying decrease this exponential rate of growth of Covid-19.

——————
Whenever you have exponential growth, whatever it is that’s growing will double its presence/population in a given amount of time. Let’s say you start with a population that has just one infected person on January 1st, and the number of infected people doubles every three days.

How many people will be infected by January 31? How many people will be infected by this year’s equinox: March 19?

If the exponential nature of the infection transmission isn’t stemmed in any way, there will be 1024 infected people on January 31: about a thousand times as many as you began with. That’s a lot, but remember that this continues to double every three days as long as this growth remains exponential. On February 3, there will be twice as many: 2048 infected. On February 6, that rises to 4096. By the time you get to March 19, which is 78 days after the initial infection, some 67 million people will be infected.
——————

So....
Here’s an exercise for Title Con...

Part a)
Hypothetically, if 67 million people become infected, what % is that of 327 million?

Part b)
Does the answer from part a) represent your chance of becoming infected. And, if so, why is that figure so different from the .002% you stated earlier?

You have one week to turn in your work. I suspect you’ll need all 7 days.

I will play along since you are obviously a retard and currently hanging yourself!!!
answer to a) is 20.4% !!!!! (that is obviously a much bigger difference and way much bigger threat than .002%) and that is great for us!!!! as i said before at .002% you will be extremely lucky to meet someone with corona virus!!!!

b) The difference between the actual infected rate of .002% and the theory of 20.4% (ready for this? its more simple math: 20.45-.0025 = 20.398.

Thank you for playing and showing all of us how incredibly stupid and retarded you really are!!!!!!!! dumb-ss!!!!!

[Unregistered]

^^^
OMG. Lol!

[Unregistered]

^^^
OMG. Lol!

You’ve triggered him. That’s when he tosses the R word around. Been there. Many times. Welcome to the club.

[Unregistered]

^^^
OMG. Lol!

I know, right ? A true masterpiece of nuttery.

[Unregistered]

I will play along since you are obviously a retard and currently hanging yourself!!!
answer to a) is 20.4% !!!!! (that is obviously a much bigger difference and way much bigger threat than .002%) and that is great for us!!!! as i said before at .002% you will be extremely lucky to meet someone with corona virus!!!!

b) The difference between the actual infected rate of .002% and the theory of 20.4% (ready for this? its more simple math: 20.45-.0025 = 20.398.

Thank you for playing and showing all of us how incredibly stupid and retarded you really are!!!!!!!! dumb-ss!!!!!

The distribution in # of exclamation points per occurrence is fascinating