Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Not really. But when the wicked super smaht guy uses a condescending analogy, I worked to try to see if it fit. It doesn't, so I moved on. Maybe you should, too.

it wasn't my analogy and I've commented on what i feel. you are still not dressing the far more serious things going on, are you?

I think we can issue you your hater merit badge now. Clearly you are less concerned with what nugget and the NRA are saying than you are with pedantic diversions.

Remember diversions?

[Unregistered]

Yes I know. Smokescreen for fact a nutter will never address the sensibility of the private sale loophole being discontinued.

cant even have that level of common sense. Have you commented on Nugent yet? If you haven't then please, you know where your whining about me can be shoved.

Didn't you get that earlier? You are in a thread with "someOne" on your side of the political teeter-totter and you sit there silent when they express the most vile and hateful things possible, wishing death and destruction on myself and others with regularity.

Crickets.

But we hear your constant smarmy butt hurt about my politeness.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

so funny

you cant even bring yourself to disavow Nugent and the NRA ( they would have booted him off their board already if they endorsed decent american values) in the strongest possible terms, can you? Ive consistently and earnestly said I don't bear similar ill will. But I do make fun of you nutters and for that I guess I should die a slow and painful death.

Children. Somebody should have taken you all out to the woodshed when it might have done a little good. Thank god your values will be dead by the time our grandchildren are the adults.

there you go. thought i'd bump it for ya hateful nutter. give it a shot.

go ahead you can tell us that ted should be arrested for incitement and then explain to us why we should be concerned by beyonce.

try that on for size, nutter.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

i love to rub your snouts in your own poo for you!

tee hee
bwa ha ah

go ahead and rage now about how HORRIBLE what i said was, ok? and keep ignoring the incitement to violence and murder that seems to be quickly becoming the lifeblood of the trumps movement.

yeah...like you would ever take that on

[Unregistered]

there you go. thought i'd bump it for ya hateful nutter. give it a shot.

go ahead you can tell us that ted should be arrested for incitement and then explain to us why we should be concerned by beyonce.

try that on for size, nutter.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

i love to rub your snouts in your own poo for you!

tee hee
bwa ha ah

go ahead and rage now about how HORRIBLE what i said was, ok? and keep ignoring the incitement to violence and murder that seems to be quickly becoming the lifeblood of the trumps movement.

yeah...like you would ever take that on

Cons....why don't you oink once if you are with ted, twice if you aren't. I know you don't have the backbone to actually use words to disagree with any of your movement's "talking points" even when they do feature murderous rage.

Meanwhile, another installment if lizzie taking more bark off of trump. Weak! Weak that she can even hold court with the great one!

every time there is a twitter exchange between the two of them he will lose more white woman votes as fellas votes of all kind. Lets see....hes going to spend the next six months fending her and other off and looking crazy....awesome!

gonna be fun!

[Unregistered]

Looks like we are done playing "good con , bad con" when the mask gets ripped off and "no con" will put daylight between themselves and the vile, murderous sentiments some of the con persuasion spew on this very bulletin board.

Now you see why I have zero time for the "good con" act when they go all butt hurt and indignant about lib bad manners when again, they can't separate themselves from murderous rage and constantly dwelling on the most perverted, depraved and unrealistic end point of every butt hurt issue that doesn't go their way.

Again, respectfully, GET LOST cons

Tee hee
Bwa ha ha

[Unregistered]

After a time some con will, with our remarking move on to some navel gazing issue of butt hurt only to cons....

[Unregistered]

Cons....why don't you oink once if you are with ted, twice if you aren't. I know you don't have the backbone to actually use words to disagree with any of your movement's "talking points" even when they do feature murderous rage.

Meanwhile, another installment if lizzie taking more bark off of trump. Weak! Weak that she can even hold court with the great one!

every time there is a twitter exchange between the two of them he will lose more white woman votes as fellas votes of all kind. Lets see....hes going to spend the next six months fending her and other off and looking crazy....awesome!

gonna be fun!

Little p responding to his own posts??? Who would have thunk it!

Hey little p, at least try to disguise your posts with proper English grammar when responding to your own.

[Unregistered]

So little p, what do you think of this?

The State Department said today it can’t find Bryan Pagliano’s emails from the time he served as Secretary of State*Hillary Clinton’s senior information technology staffer during her tenure there. Pagliano would have been required to turn over any official communications from his work account before he left the government. State Department officials say he had an official email account, but that they can't find any of those records he would have turned over and continue to search for them. “The Department has searched for Mr. Pagliano’s email pst file and has not located one that covers the time period of Secretary Clinton’s tenure,” State Department spokesman Elizabeth Trudeau said today, referencing a file format that holds email.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/email...ry?id=38989504

[Unregistered]

Hey little p, Rush equated Ben Rhodes to Jonathan Gruber yesterday. You know, both these guys arrogance gave away the lies told to the American people by this administration.

[Unregistered]

Little p likes to talk about the Republican Party imploding. After all, that's what the liberal media tells him day to day. What the libs don't like to talk about is what's going on in the Democrat Party, probably out of fear of what the lefties will do when the truth sinks in.

Sanders has won 19 of the final 25 primaries and caucuses and yet Clinton has all been but crowned queen of the Democrat Party.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-a...b_9898436.html

[Unregistered]

Hey little p, Rush equated Ben Rhodes to Jonathan Gruber yesterday. You know, both these guys arrogance gave away the lies told to the American people by this administration.

We created an echo chamber. They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say.” - Ben Rhodes

[Unregistered]

The hypocrites known as "liberals" are really on display today.

"Eschew male-only organizations unaffiliated with Harvard, and you may be captain of a male-only organization affiliated with Harvard, the football team. Avoid female-only groups, and you remain eligible for a scholarship honoring a notorious male British imperialist.

Only Harvard, I suppose, could so cunningly manipulate its hyper-competitive students’ ambitions in the cause of social leveling. Only Harvard could proclaim its opposition to arbitrary “privilege and exclusion” while running a$38 billion*hedge fund (a.k.a. the*Harvard Endowment) and rejecting 95 percent of applicants — based on murky criteria rumored to include everything from SAT scores to alumni connections.

There must be no exclusive clubs within this exclusive club. Dean Rakesh Khurana, the new policy’s intellectual author,*declared that*“their fundamental principles are antithetical to our institutional values,” with no apparent awareness of the chilly authoritarianism he was directing at theapproximately 25 percent*of students who belong to the groups in question — and who, at last check, have a perfect right to be at odds with any “institutional values” they please..... Also on its agenda may be a contradiction between the new edict and the*constitution*of Harvard’s elected Undergraduate Council, which expressly opposes “restriction of any one’s freedom of public speech, assembly, expression, or association.” As the president and vice president of that Harvard-recognized body point out in*an open letter, “vetting of elected members of student government based on affiliation in certain groups is detrimental, and fundamentally opposed, to . . . the democratic process.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c62_story.html

[Unregistered]

The hypocrites known as "liberals" are really on display today.

"Eschew male-only organizations unaffiliated with Harvard, and you may be captain of a male-only organization affiliated with Harvard, the football team. Avoid female-only groups, and you remain eligible for a scholarship honoring a notorious male British imperialist.

Only Harvard, I suppose, could so cunningly manipulate its hyper-competitive students’ ambitions in the cause of social leveling. Only Harvard could proclaim its opposition to arbitrary “privilege and exclusion” while running a$38 billion*hedge fund (a.k.a. the*Harvard Endowment) and rejecting 95 percent of applicants — based on murky criteria rumored to include everything from SAT scores to alumni connections.

There must be no exclusive clubs within this exclusive club. Dean Rakesh Khurana, the new policy’s intellectual author,*declared that*“their fundamental principles are antithetical to our institutional values,” with no apparent awareness of the chilly authoritarianism he was directing at theapproximately 25 percent*of students who belong to the groups in question — and who, at last check, have a perfect right to be at odds with any “institutional values” they please..... Also on its agenda may be a contradiction between the new edict and the*constitution*of Harvard’s elected Undergraduate Council, which expressly opposes “restriction of any one’s freedom of public speech, assembly, expression, or association.” As the president and vice president of that Harvard-recognized body point out in*an open letter, “vetting of elected members of student government based on affiliation in certain groups is detrimental, and fundamentally opposed, to . . . the democratic process.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c62_story.html

"We live in the time of Liberal McCarthyism with Trump as the antidote. Trump would be smart to leave Muslims and Mexicans alone and deport the people who are destroying our universities - he would get my vote."

Bwahahahaha!

[Unregistered]

Little p responding to his own posts??? Who would have thunk it!

Hey little p, at least try to disguise your posts with proper English grammar when responding to your own.

Im not hiding that i followed up that post. Showing your moron red again?

Now that you popped up mr "reasonable" nutter, I don't suppose you can tell us why you haven't commented on ted nuggets video or perhaps the fact that you are clearly ok with the hateful rhetoric thrown at me and now my family for that matter.

crickets

silence

you sir are nothing but a POS degenerate. You WILL be left behind. welcome to the new world.

Third time this is getting posted. lets see if any of the nutters that are too stupid to live will take a stand.

es I know. Smokescreen for fact a nutter will never address the sensibility of the private sale loophole being discontinued.

cant even have that level of common sense. Have you commented on Nugent yet? If you haven't then please, you know where your whining about me can be shoved.

Didn't you get that earlier? You are in a thread with "someOne" on your side of the political teeter-totter and you sit there silent when they express the most vile and hateful things possible, wishing death and destruction on myself and others with regularity.

Crickets.

But we hear your constant smarmy butt hurt about my politeness.

tee hee
bwa ha ha

so funny

you cant even bring yourself to disavow Nugent and the NRA ( they would have booted him off their board already if they endorsed decent american values) in the strongest possible terms, can you? Ive consistently and earnestly said I don't bear similar ill will. But I do make fun of you nutters and for that I guess I should die a slow and painful death.

Children. Somebody should have taken you all out to the woodshed when it might have done a little good. Thank god your values will be dead by the time our grandchildren are the adults.

Speaking of children I don't wish for it but don't be surprised if the kinds of horrible things you wish on others don't happen to those you love. Karma. One reaps what one sows sometimes. What will b e tough is you haven't armed them with the resilience that decent human beings have. how could you. your children were raised by a HATER. Hopefully, they can turn their lives around.

[Unregistered]

keep in m ind folks that the nutters call everyone else "haters"

I won't use the same eliminationist rhetoric they are fond of. But don't turn you back on them. they are the lowest form of degenerate humanity around, but we have to lift their children out of the cesspool their parents raised them. Cant do much about the middle aged to senior haters. They just have to die out. But they ARE losing their own children. Look at the changing attitudes int he country.

Hurry up and step off stage ex lax. Keep eating as much corn and soybeans as you can and keep raising your blood pressure with your hatred. You'll take care of yourself before long like all the other undereducated white welfare class that were discussed killing themselves with alcoholism etc.

Bet you like a couple belts every night, eh?

I mean, that is why you hate colleges, isn't it? Just something else you didn't compete successfully at, which is fine not everyone can go to the better and best institutions if you went at all. But like a whiny baby its the ENTITLEMENT that gets in the way. You think you are owed that seat at the better place when, if you just look at the data, you don't.

Losers sometimes turn really, really angry.

[Unregistered]

I have zero connection to Ted Nugent, doesn't speak for me, or my values. When you come out against the dozens of crazy loons acting just as despicable as he does, then you'd have a point. Otherwise, you prove to be nothing more than a hypocrite, of which I waste little time on.

Well, I don't know where they come from, but they sure do come. I hope they coming for me. And, I don't know how they do it, but they sure do it good. I hope they're doing it for free. They give me cat scratch fever.