Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

NC has a lot of issues

Seven former workers at Jackson Farming Company, the Sampson County farm owned by State Senator Brent Jackson, have filed a lawsuit in federal court against the farm, Jackson, and his son Rodney alleging gross violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act, and are seeking unpaid wages and damages.

Former worker José Alberto Aguilera-Hernandez says that Rodney Jackson confronted him on October 27, 2015, demanding that he pay $2,400 to replace a gas pump piece broken during a workplace accident.

Aguilera-Hernandez refused, was fired on the spot, and was forced to leave the farm.

Jackson then withheld back wages from the previous week’s work. Aguilera-Hernandez, a worker on an H2A visa from Mexico, was forced to solicit help from a local storeowner to get back home. The plaintiffs in the case say that farm employees threatened them to try to get them to drop the lawsuit, and after they went forward, were refused employment. With the way the H2A program works, Farm Labor Organizing Committee spokeswoman Briana Kemp says, the worker has to be formally requested by a grower in order to be brought to work in the U.S.

“I couldn’t believe he would treat another human being this way,” Aguilera-Hernandez said in a statement. “He knows I don’t know anyone here and don’t have any way of finding a place to stay or a way home.”

horrible people leading NC

[Unregistered]

read this to realize how hard the cons work to keep their crown of ignorance



i guess if you aren't born to become male, white, overweight, etc the cons don't think you deserve any protections. just the white nationalists get that in their view

The Doctor's are addressing the plight of children. One of foundations in the lawsuit addresses the law regarding worker's rights. How many children are working in State Offices ?
As far as schools go, compromises for children could easily be negotiated to satisfy their needs. If progressives will compromise at all.

This is an overreach by the Justice Dept., but they may prevail in Court. It only involves State Offices and schools. It does not apply to areas used by the general public. However a victory for Progressives in this small portion, in one state, may be the exact springboard they are looking for to impose their will on the rest of the country. Many other states have such laws under consideration.

Basically, progressives see such laws as discriminatory , while those making the laws see it as protection for the overwhelming vast majority of people that aren't LGBT. Again, Progressives overly concerned with the rights of a minority, despite what effect it may have on the majority. They just aren't interested in that.

Similar thinking by the ACLU and their attacks on Catholic Hospitals for their refusal to do abortions. They have no regard for the majority of Catholics and members of other faiths that depend upon Catholic Hospitals for care, employment, and education , but are overly concerned with the minority who insist upon abortion on demand.

[Unregistered]

you clearly didn't talk to any lawyers about this. The brief NC filed was an embarrassment. Cited only cases that are no longer controlling and didn't even mention all the case law standing against them.

Than you conservatives. we wouldn't have been able to run the ball down field as fast as will happen on this issue without your help.

Much like same sex marriage. Thanks for helping the cause.

tee hee
bwa haha

You can talk to lawyers all you want. They are not always right. That's why Courts and Judges decide. Like nearly everything else these days , we will end up in the Supreme Court. This the era of Social Justice. No matter all the big problems this country faces on a daily basis, this is where the energy of Progressives is focused on. No wonder we are in such a deep hole.

21st century arguing about what bathroom to use. Head out to San Francisco, where public parks are getting a circular wall, open on three sides , so people can urinate . Problem solved, right?

[Unregistered]

This is an overreach by the Justice Dept., but they may prevail in Court.

translation: the other team was better and would beat us 100/100 but i cant admit that I am wrong.


Dear moron:

a state (NC) muscles in on a local law (Charleston) and passes this stinker to appease the haters. They overreached on their authority, didn't they? there was no law that controlled and they hastily put this turkey together and passed it.

Then when the fed, unlike the sate because there are federal civil rights laws you know, comes in and files suit. NC calls that overreach.

Funny hilarious laughing. hahahah

NC's suit didn't even mention "title iX' think fed's brief won't?

big loss coming. gonna be an earthquake just like the gay rights ruling when the supremos take care of this. Kennedy swings on this stuff all the time

Done for. McCoy was dumb. all about him getting all the white haters out to polls so he could get reelected. state going back decades

[Unregistered]

You can talk to lawyers all you want. They are not always right. That's why Courts and Judges decide. Like nearly everything else these days , we will end up in the Supreme Court. This the era of Social Justice. No matter all the big problems this country faces on a daily basis, this is where the energy of Progressives is focused on. No wonder we are in such a deep hole.

21st century arguing about what bathroom to use. Head out to San Francisco, where public parks are getting a circular wall, open on three sides , so people can urinate . Problem solved, right?

ok lets wait and see....just make sure you come back and issue your mea culpas when i turn out to be correct as I am 95+% of the time


also too you stupid moron there have been naturally occurring transgender people since there have been humans and this law actually compromises their civil rights. sorry you don't have the capacity to learn enough to understand.

start with "androgen insensitivity" and try to understand how a genetic make could develop as a normal female until puberty.

your inability to get things like this reveals your ignorance.

they have been around forever and using YOUR bathroom. the horror!

[Unregistered]

ok lets wait and see....just make sure you come back and issue your mea culpas when i turn out to be correct as I am 95+% of the time


also too you stupid moron there have been naturally occurring transgender people since there have been humans and this law actually compromises their civil rights. sorry you don't have the capacity to learn enough to understand.

start with "androgen insensitivity" and try to understand how a genetic make could develop as a normal female until puberty.

your inability to get things like this reveals your ignorance.

they have been around forever and using YOUR bathroom. the horror!

The insults...right on schedule.

Why is it that Progressives like you are unable to conduct yourself as an adult, and always need to rant like juvenile?


" until puberty" A child.
Civil Rights, sure everything is a " civil right " to progressive. Like I said, the era of Social Justice. As the country circles the drain, the bathroom issue is paramount.

[Unregistered]

translation: the other team was better and would beat us 100/100 but i cant admit that I am wrong.


Dear moron:

a state (NC) muscles in on a local law (Charleston) and passes this stinker to appease the haters. They overreached on their authority, didn't they? there was no law that controlled and they hastily put this turkey together and passed it.

Then when the fed, unlike the sate because there are federal civil rights laws you know, comes in and files suit. NC calls that overreach.

Funny hilarious laughing. hahahah

NC's suit didn't even mention "title iX' think fed's brief won't?

big loss coming. gonna be an earthquake just like the gay rights ruling when the supremos take care of this. Kennedy swings on this stuff all the time

Done for. McCoy was dumb. all about him getting all the white haters out to polls so he could get reelected. state going back decades

Translation:

A State Issue involving State Employees and schools administered by the State , but Bully Obama controls the cash so sends his Social Justice Warriors to fight for the less than 5 % of the population, in an extremely limited scope. How many LGBT people could there be working for the State ?

[Unregistered]

Not sure why you get so upset tampax when all I wish for you is that you reap the fruits of the programs you espouse here regularly - passionately no less.

as far as S&PD there are plenty of natural ways to go that would fall in that category quite nicely. I love my family too much to waste my time on a hater like you.

[Unregistered]

The insults...right on schedule.

Why is it that Progressives like you are unable to conduct yourself as an adult, and always need to rant like juvenile?


" until puberty" A child.
Civil Rights, sure everything is a " civil right " to progressive. Like I said, the era of Social Justice. As the country circles the drain, the bathroom issue is paramount.

That you can't appreciates the human biology revealed there and accommodate that reality in your appreciation of these "laws" means you are so stupid you deserve every designation and more.

Dumb as a bag of hammers. Ignorant. Read the DOJ suit. It expertly lays out naturally occurring gender ambiguity and extends from that to argue why it is a civil rights violation to bring laws like this to bear on that population. Period. End of story because that is how our Constitution rolls.

The filing by NC would be sophomoric by comparison if it were a bit less amateurish than it actually is. It was hastily assembled and there is little case law they could use to support things.

The relative maturity shown by the two filings is reminiscent of the superiority of my understanding of the issues, as evidenced in this post for anyone rational to see, to yours as evidenced by your *****ly hurt fee fees argument.

As big a baby as trump. Have you noticed that I never respond like that when you call me things? Only thing I mention are the haters wishing death and more to me here. They get no respect from me, So stop whining about insults you big baby. Toughen up or just go wet your pants.

I noticed in a previous post you are already throwing out excuses for losing this case. You know how it's going to go but will still act like that little baby, stamping feet and holding breath.

Hahahahahahaha

[Unregistered]

Not sure why you get so upset tampax when all I wish for you is that you reap the fruits of the programs you espouse here regularly - passionately no less.

Was this you ex lax? Or one of your sock puppets? Or just a con buddy?

"you will be begging him for help when some inner city thug is doing a home invasion on you and your old lady."

Idk. I think a lot of the good people out there would look at any pig like yourself who ideates that kind of hateful imagery about someone with different politic views makes a laughingstock of himself when they turn around and act wounded by a common insult like "you are a moron"

Are you more or less thin skinned and small handed than Drumpf ?

Tee hee bwa ha ha ha ha

That's why I would kick your sorry behind from here to high heaven and not break a sweat. You are one of the few who just might be in a different, lower strata of humanity than the vast majority of the rest.

The haters. Go stand in the corner of there with the others. We will leave you behind if you don't smarten up.

winning.


as far as S&PD there are plenty of natural ways to go that would fall in that category quite nicely. I love my family too much to waste my time on a hater like you.[/QUOTE]

[Unregistered]

Translation:

A State Issue involving State Employees and schools administered by the State , but Bully Obama controls the cash so sends his Social Justice Warriors to fight for the less than 5 % of the population, in an extremely limited scope. How many LGBT people could there be working for the State ?

Ok here we go cons....try this on for size.

Some individuals with partial forms of androgen insensitivity appear and develop as normal females from intrauterine to puberty despite the fact the individual is genetically male. That isn't tested for at birth.In some cases at puberty, sufficient androgen does exert influence that development as a male commences....body hair ....penis growth.....etc.

Are you cons still presenting instances where someone who identifies as female until their early teens might elect to continue living and identifying as a female? I can see this going either way in a free society and people pole should be free to choose what is best for them given an. Amalgam of considerations. But it is their choice. It yours and you will not punish them and act like this is just a Pervy issues of choice. That's incredibly ignorant of reality.

Now go away to the dark places. There are so many additional biological considerations ....you are just too stupid to grasp them.

[Unregistered]

The Doctor's are addressing the plight of children. One of foundations in the lawsuit addresses the law regarding worker's rights. How many children are working in State Offices ?
As far as schools go, compromises for children could easily be negotiated to satisfy their needs. If progressives will compromise at all.

This is an overreach by the Justice Dept., but they may prevail in Court. It only involves State Offices and schools. It does not apply to areas used by the general public. However a victory for Progressives in this small portion, in one state, may be the exact springboard they are looking for to impose their will on the rest of the country. Many other states have such laws under consideration.

Basically, progressives see such laws as discriminatory , while those making the laws see it as protection for the overwhelming vast majority of people that aren't LGBT. Again, Progressives overly concerned with the rights of a minority, despite what effect it may have on the majority. They just aren't interested in that.

Similar thinking by the ACLU and their attacks on Catholic Hospitals for their refusal to do abortions. They have no regard for the majority of Catholics and members of other faiths that depend upon Catholic Hospitals for care, employment, and education , but are overly concerned with the minority who insist upon abortion on demand.

Hmmmn. This is an interesting issue. I must say this. On numerous occasions I have watched women of all ages enter the men's restrooms in Gillette, Boston Garden and other venues during concerts and sporting events. I guess if you are drunk and sporting a lil red Dixie cup during a Justin Aldean concert it is ok but not if you are LGTBQ......

[Unregistered]

That you can't appreciates the human biology revealed there and accommodate that reality in your appreciation of these "laws" means you are so stupid you deserve every designation and more.

Dumb as a bag of hammers. Ignorant. Read the DOJ suit. It expertly lays out naturally occurring gender ambiguity and extends from that to argue why it is a civil rights violation to bring laws like this to bear on that population. Period. End of story because that is how our Constitution rolls.

The filing by NC would be sophomoric by comparison if it were a bit less amateurish than it actually is. It was hastily assembled and there is little case law they could use to support things.

The relative maturity shown by the two filings is reminiscent of the superiority of my understanding of the issues, as evidenced in this post for anyone rational to see, to yours as evidenced by your *****ly hurt fee fees argument.

As big a baby as trump. Have you noticed that I never respond like that when you call me things? Only thing I mention are the haters wishing death and more to me here. They get no respect from me, So stop whining about insults you big baby. Toughen up or just go wet your pants.

I noticed in a previous post you are already throwing out excuses for losing this case. You know how it's going to go but will still act like that little baby, stamping feet and holding breath.

Hahahahahahaha

No, no and no.

What the Justice Dept is trying to do is include LGBT people into the same protected class of citizens as described in the Civil Rights Laws. That decision is for Congress, the Legislative body that created the law. The Courts do not make Law, only rule on existing Laws if challenged. This is the case here.

As is the case more and more as Courts lean politically left with their decisions, skirting with the concept of separation of powers, this is what the DOJ is hoping for. Another end around by the bully with the cash in his hands.

What the DOJ should be looking for is the " lost" E Mails that are missing for the 4 years of employment of their employee who set up Hillary with her servers. Imagine, an employee sets up servers for the US State Dept. which may involve the communications of top people discussing sensitive matters of National Security, and 4 years of his E Mail communications are " missing".

The MSM media is doing a great job of keeping this under wraps using the smokescreen of their latest Social Justice Crusade.

It may be " hastily assembled" simply because the DOJ cut in half the amount of time NC asked for to deal with the issue. That's what a bully does. That's Obama at work. The issue could be addressed in the Legislature , where the law was written.

[Unregistered]

The insults...right on schedule.

Why is it that Progressives like you are unable to conduct yourself as an adult, and always need to rant like juvenile?


" until puberty" A child.
Civil Rights, sure everything is a " civil right " to progressive. Like I said, the era of Social Justice. As the country circles the drain, the bathroom issue is paramount.

I think that if an individual is genetically male but suffers from androgen insensitivity and therefore develops as an apparent female such that no one would ever guess by external appearances. If that person lived their whole life as a femal, it is most certainly a civil rights violation to force them into a single sex bathroom frequented by people who externally appear as males.

Such a simple answer to a simple question.

[Unregistered]

Hmmmn. This is an interesting issue. I must say this. On numerous occasions I have watched women of all ages enter the men's restrooms in Gillette, Boston Garden and other venues during concerts and sporting events. I guess if you are drunk and sporting a lil red Dixie cup during a Justin Aldean concert it is ok but not if you are LGTBQ......

How about if males did the same thing? How about a dozen males walking into a restroom with one female In it ? I mean, they say they identified themselves as females....