Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    When it comes to guns the left wants to limit any way they can. They 'feel' that controlling gun ownership is a sure way to limit gun violence. Even though the data would suggest a very different outcome.
    Wrong. Progressives like me only want guns to be licensed the way drivers, hairdressers, masseuses, and other similar endeavours. Amazing how the nutters are ok with licenses to peacefully assemble (an ahem constitutional right) but not for guns (that right being associated with participation in a well regulated militia).

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Oh ted's an NRA board member i see....

      so the guy who just posted a mocked up video along with his fantasies about hillary clint being shot live on tv has this blurb anticipating his upcoming talk any the upcoming NRA convention.



      Anyone have any doubt about what is stoked by this stuff that after all, goes on in plain sight while the nutters cry like they do here about uncivil liberals and twist their panties about the lack of respect snd care they are treated with.

      Thats why i offer them no illusions that they will get that, although as you see they still get common human decency from me. More than i can say.

      Have anything to say nutters? can you imagine the outcry if reversed? My god there was a meltdown about Beyonce's video that will far exceed any righteous indignation about this kind of stuff.

      Folks look at the common themes running straight through from nugget to some, not all, of the local nutters, but also what happens when those nutters turn a blind eye to the extreme ones in the interest of preserving some imagined "brands" that no longer exists anyway.

      We do need to be wary. Some of these nutters are clearly getting aroused enough that they will be harming us. This kind off rhetoric always boils over into that.

      Bring on the false equivalencies now nutters. Sure you can find some instances of someone doing something to squirm away like a four year old blaming a play mate.

      Have at it. But my patience is over with you.
      What do you expect from the demographic that went beserk over Janet Jacksons nipple slip. No worries on their point about horrific depictions of murderous rampages for our children to absorb but god forgive a nursing mother feed her baby in public.

      At one of our recent shows we had a mother in the front row nursing her baby. Tolerant and liberal crowd never batted an eye. It was beautiful and natural.

      Only the mind of a deviant would draw any kind of erotic association to nursing a child. That is the sign of a sick mind. In my view fundamental Christianity is a form of mental illness.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        Wrong. Progressives like me only want guns to be licensed the way drivers, hairdressers, masseuses, and other similar endeavours. Amazing how the nutters are ok with licenses to peacefully assemble (an ahem constitutional right) but not for guns (that right being associated with participation in a well regulated militia).

        Interesting analogy. So, we have lots of rules in place today. Expand on what you want more so I can understand your point better.

        A big sticking point, for example, is private sales should not be allowed, even from family members. To use your hairdresser example, my wife needs a license to shave my head?

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Interesting analogy. So, we have lots of rules in place today. Expand on what you want more so I can understand your point better.

          A big sticking point, for example, is private sales should not be allowed, even from family members. To use your hairdresser example, my wife needs a license to shave my head?
          Any transfer of a gun whether gift or sold should be registered. To use my hairdresser example, if my wife gets a cosmo license she can't give it to her kid.

          If your gun transactions are so patriotic and upstanding why are you so concerned about shining the light of day on them.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Any transfer of a gun whether gift or sold should be registered. To use my hairdresser example, if my wife gets a cosmo license she can't give it to her kid.

            If your gun transactions are so patriotic and upstanding why are you so concerned about shining the light of day on them.
            First, to be clear, I don't own a gun and I'm not saying I disagree with there being more rules, or the minimum, enforcing what we have. It's a hot topic, so I am looking to better my knowledge about them.

            The hairdresser thing puzzles me. This is a service, not a product, so transferring a license to perform something differs from a license to own something. A license to perform is not transferable, as it's tied to the action (i.e the verb, not the noun). A hairdresser can still cut my hair, but not as a place of business. If she wants to swing by my house and do it...is it illegal (I'm asking)?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              First, to be clear, I don't own a gun and I'm not saying I disagree with there being more rules, or the minimum, enforcing what we have. It's a hot topic, so I am looking to better my knowledge about them.

              The hairdresser thing puzzles me. This is a service, not a product, so transferring a license to perform something differs from a license to own something. A license to perform is not transferable, as it's tied to the action (i.e the verb, not the noun). A hairdresser can still cut my hair, but not as a place of business. If she wants to swing by my house and do it...is it illegal (I'm asking)?
              There are these devises called automobiles.

              As for cutting hair on the side. The income is taxable (not that anybody reports it) and I supposed technically if that is your primary source of income whether or not you are operating a bricks and mortar or not it is still considered a business. If you have ever seen anyone burned by improper hair bleaching or coloring you'd understand. Not pretty.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                There are these devises called automobiles.

                As for cutting hair on the side. The income is taxable (not that anybody reports it) and I supposed technically if that is your primary source of income whether or not you are operating a bricks and mortar or not it is still considered a business. If you have ever seen anyone burned by improper hair bleaching or coloring you'd understand. Not pretty.
                Re automobiles: Do I need a license to sell you my car in a private transaction?

                As for cutting hair on the side, no money exchanges hands. Just someone who performs an act that if it were your business, you would need a license for. But, there is nothing illegal about cutting our shaving what you want on the side if it's not a business transaction.

                I guess I'll be called a moron soon and then stop interacting, but until then...I still need more clarification on how the analogies fit.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  Interesting analogy. So, we have lots of rules in place today. Expand on what you want more so I can understand your point better.

                  A big sticking point, for example, is private sales should not be allowed, even from family members. To use your hairdresser example, my wife needs a license to shave my head?
                  When your child takes over title to your automobile, the change is registered right NUTTERS?

                  Are you nutters suggesting that relatives of people who give them automobiles should be allowed to operate those vehicles without transfer of title, etc?

                  Dumb nutters. So smaht as one of you like to say. Treat the gun like the car how about that? necessary to record the transfer if "ownership" in any way shape out form happens.

                  And before you nutters open your stupid yaps, allow me to go on....

                  feel free to let your relative USE your gun just like you may allow someone like that to use your car. But who carries the insurance? Who is responsible for the damage the vehicle does? The owner, not the borrower.

                  Is this simple enough for you smaht nutters to get? God you are so stupid. You walk into the haymakers with your nonsensical dance on a pin scenarios.

                  Comment


                    heck i replied upthread and it appears another prog/lib got it as fast as I did.

                    and yes nutter i am calling you a moron again if your penetrating intelligence doesn't "get it" like the two of us did. so blinded

                    Comment


                      Hmm...Ok. Good point about the change being registered, not the person being licensed to make the change in a private transaction. That was the context I understood it.

                      I won't acknowledge the rest of your post.

                      Comment


                        Trump has announced he won't release his tax returns. No surprise there.

                        Comment


                          cutting hair on the side. this is the reality space the nutters want to spend 99% of their limited mental faculties on?

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Hmm...Ok. Good point about the change being registered, not the person being licensed to make the change in a private transaction. That was the context I understood it.

                            I won't acknowledge the rest of your post.
                            Yes I know. Smokescreen for fact a nutter will never address the sensibility of the private sale loophole being discontinued.

                            cant even have that level of common sense. Have you commented on Nugent yet? If you haven't then please, you know where your whining about me can be shoved.

                            Didn't you get that earlier? You are in a thread with "someOne" on your side of the political teeter-totter and you sit there silent when they express the most vile and hateful things possible, wishing death and destruction on myself and others with regularity.

                            Crickets.

                            But we hear your constant smarmy butt hurt about my politeness.

                            tee hee
                            bwa ha ha

                            so funny

                            you cant even bring yourself to disavow Nugent and the NRA ( they would have booted him off their board already if they endorsed decent american values) in the strongest possible terms, can you? Ive consistently and earnestly said I don't bear similar ill will. But I do make fun of you nutters and for that I guess I should die a slow and painful death.

                            Children. Somebody should have taken you all out to the woodshed when it might have done a little good. Thank god your values will be dead by the time our grandchildren are the adults.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              cutting hair on the side. this is the reality space the nutters want to spend 99% of their limited mental faculties on?
                              Not really. But when the wicked super smaht guy uses a condescending analogy, I worked to try to see if it fit. It doesn't, so I moved on. Maybe you should, too.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Trump has announced he won't release his tax returns. No surprise there.
                                Nice discussion you might enjoy here...

                                http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-s-tax-returns

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X