Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Right, missed the part about me calling him "a sideshow", huh?

If you want to search for crazies, you'll find them. If I had the desire, I'll go onto the BLM movement pages and start calling up posts where they want to kill whites....

I was actually referring to the post just before yours. I should have quoted the post. Apologies.

[Unregistered]

Actually the decline of the middle class began under Reagan with his "rising tide lifts all ships" tax philosophy. He was the equivalent of having Chance the Butler in the White House. Dogmatic, narrow minded, intellectually incurious, and with serious cognitive disabilities for about half his tenure. By far the worst President of the 20th Century (Hoover and Harding were do nothings so they can't even be rated...) with the exception of GW2 and his 2 useless and expensive wars not to mention the intelligence failure of 9-11 where he was warned well in advance that a complex terror plot was in play.

- Cujo

Jimmy Carter was the worst president in the 20th Century. A disaster at all levels. Reagan trounced him to win the election and was re-elected for a second term. You can thank Carters ineptitude for Reagan's success.

[Unregistered]

good read

http://thefederalist.com/2015/12/10/...rd-university/

[Unregistered]

what a bunch of nonsense - how many trillions spent since 1964??
Tax the rich feed the poor until there are no rich no more - and I would add middleclass.
The middleclass which for the first time is now a minority in the country - under the traitor Obozo's leadership. He is more worried about isis feelings than the citizens of this nation. Worst president ever - yes worse than carter.

Actually it isn't unusual for citizens of the US to migrate from one earning class to another. Traditionally, younger people start at the lower level and move up as they expand into their chosen career paths. Some older individuals near the end of their earnings potential are still staying employed longer but at lower earnings levels.

With the large number of boomers reaching retirement age on a daily basis, the decisions arrive regarding how to best navigate the waters of pensions, Social Security, 401K IRA etc.

The question is the latest trend, under the 7 years of Obama, have seen an increase in both the top and bottom, but where are those earners coming from ? It would be natural to assume that the upper levels are being fed by the middle, but the problem really is where the bottom of the earners are coming from.

In many cases, some are middle class that have fallen back, but the majority of the increase has been from the ever growing, expanding dependence on Government handouts. It stagnates the growth out of the lower levels when you provide so many avenues to keep them there. It has taken away the incentive to rise, as there is less discomfort. 10 million more added to the SNAP program under Obama , all of them part of that mushrooming lower earnings group.

This is a fundamental issue of the human condition, motivation to rise up is diminished as humans seek the path of least resistance. Progressives continually either fail to acknowledge or ignore it.

[Unregistered]

You actually trust the banks to tell you what happened? O. M. G.

Lol

As a matter of fact I do. Ask your local community banker what has been happening in the banking industry the past 25 years or so. Those banks had nothing to do with the economy going into freefall, but they sure have been affected by the decisions coming out of DC made by people (yes, Democrats too) being influenced by Wall Street and not Main Street.

The same can be said of what's happening in public education and medicine. The bureaucrats in DC get paid to think up more bureaucracy which keeps them and their cronies employed while their policies are passed along to those who no longer have the time to do the work they were hired to do because their time is spent trying to keep pace with government regulation compliance.

[Unregistered]

Here is an example of a pro-Trump post on stormfront.org.
(This is one of the less-offensive ones.)
I'll bet the previous TS poster would feel very comfortable on StormFront.



Re: Trump: Ban ALL Muslims from Entering the U.S.
________________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDX
First step of our country in the right direction.

Definitely.

Step 1. Stop all non-white immigration into this country
Step 2. Deport all non-whites back to their home countries, or those that want to stay can have a state or two designated to them that will be walled off from and independent from the United States. Any Western country may purchase that new country and do with it what they like, because you know damn well a bunch of Muds, Mestizos, Mulattos, and Mongrel-lovers aren't going to be able to run a country themselves.
Step 3. Only allow white immigration into the country.
Step 4. Enjoy cultural and economic prosperity.

As usual liberals living in the past.

"Experts who monitor hate groups like the KKK say the results of their efforts yield little fruit, as their ranks are as thin as they've ever been....*Those who monitor these types of extremist groups say their numbers are nowhere near where they were in their heyday in the 1920s, when they boasted nearly 5 million members. Levin says the Klan has a membership of about 5,000. The Southern Poverty Law Center gives a lower estimate of around 3,000."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/07/us/klan-numbers/

[Unregistered]

"It is no accident that President Obama’s America has given rise to Donald Trump. It is an America that is more tribalist, where people feel more racially and religiously divided; more politically correct, where people feel less free to speak their minds; and it is an America where trust in the nation’s elites, whose skills are credentialed but unproven, are at historic lows.... "

http://thefederalist.com/2015/12/08/...bamas-america/

[Unregistered]

Well, at least we can all agree with Donald Trump on this:

"If I were to run, I'd run as a Republican. They're the dumbest group of voters in the country. They love anything on Fox News. I could lie and they'd eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific."

People Magazine, 1998

[Unregistered]

Well, at least we can all agree with Donald Trump on this:

"If I were to run, I'd run as a Republican. They're the dumbest group of voters in the country. They love anything on Fox News. I could lie and they'd eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific."

People Magazine, 1998

FALSE

Origins: The above-reproduced image and quote attributed to Donald Trump began appearing in our inbox in mid-October 2015. The format is easily recognizable as one wherein words are attributed to the individual pictured, and in this case image claims that Donald Trump made the following statement in a 1998 interview with People magazine:

http://www.snopes.com/1998-trump-people-quote/

[Unregistered]

didn't Hillary say a video caused the Benghazi massacre...


TRUE

[Unregistered]

Well, at least we can all agree with Donald Trump on this:

"If I were to run, I'd run as a Republican. They're the dumbest group of voters in the country. They love anything on Fox News. I could lie and they'd eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific."

People Magazine, 1998

false

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/bog...targets-trump/

[Unregistered]

but the SPLC and ACLU said it... it must be true

[Unregistered]

This has become absolutely hilarious. I'm not on the far right, but I keep saying it...the libs are driving me there more and more every day.

[Unregistered]

This has become absolutely hilarious. I'm not on the far right, but I keep saying it...the libs are driving me there more and more every day.

Facts and logic are like Kryptonite to the left. They deal with feelings and optics.

I consider myself fairly moderate. Fiscal conservative, socially liberal. The "Reagan Democrats" have disappeared. The Democratic party has gone so far left that it is unrecognizable.

[Unregistered]

Facts and logic are like Kryptonite to the left. They deal with feelings and optics.

I consider myself fairly moderate. Fiscal conservative, socially liberal. The "Reagan Democrats" have disappeared. The Democratic party has gone so far left that it is unrecognizable.

Pretty much how I feel. If I'm not a card-carrying liberal, I must be a hateful racist.