Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostExactly!
Sanders win in Michigan yesterday should tell the nutters that there seem to be a few middle and lower class whites that found some appeal in Bernie's message. Seems like all disaffected white folks are NOT for Trump, just the racist subset.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Bwahahahaha! Giggles' compatriot.
"Congratulations, taxpayers of America: You’ve just spent $412,930 on a “scientific” paper on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.”
That’s what the National Science Foundation dropped on “Glaciers, gender and science,” 10,000-plus words of gobbledygook from University of Oregon prof Mark Carey.Sure, that’s roughly 40 bucks a word — but many of them are big words.
The study urges scientists to take a “feminist political ecology and feminist postcolonial” approach when studying melting ice caps and climate change. Hey, it’s not really global doom unless it comes with full-bore cutting-edge social-justice buzzwords.
Another taste: “The feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.”
More just science — and human-ice interactions. Wow.
Governments across the planet are spending countless billions to combat climate change — when the models that supposedly justify those outlays can’t explain why global temperatures have been flat for nearly two decades now. Yet federal funds are going for a feminist take on climate.
Almost makes you wonder if science really has much of anything to do with all the noise over climate change."
http://nypost.com/2016/03/08/feminis...imate-science/
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo Democrat administration is going to allow their nominee to go to jail during an election year. Just look what Democrats are doing to insure she is the nominee.
There could be resignations by key FBI people, and if you think Hillary's ratings will go up over it , you are dreaming. This entire election is being partially fueled by anger and frustration by the electorate. Anger and frustration against Repubs by Repubs for letting them down, and Repubs against Obama for his dismal performance. Question is when the gavel comes down, will Independents and Dems support Hillary, or will they switch over and support Trump if he is nominated. Plenty of anger and frustration in those ranks also.
Remember immunity has been granted, to the same person that clammed up over Libya and the deaths there under Hillary's watch. How long can Hillary hide the truth from Americans ? I mean , after all, it appears that many truths and secrets were placed out there in Cyberspace for any and all hackers to get their hands on. Hidden from the American people and FOI Laws was Hillary's intent all along. It is so obvious.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
"(Hillary Clinton) has been unable to put away a 74-year-old socialist from a small state with zero legislative accomplishments. That’s not exactly a sizzling campaign record. Second, she has more legal troubles than Perry Mason could handle. In public, she waves them off. In private, she must be worried. When your IT guy has immunity, the FBI has hacked your home-brew server, and the Bureau has 150 agents on the case, you better hope you have a loyal friend in the White House. The only thing standing between Hillary and the nomination is an indictment or refusal to answer FBI questions when they interview her later this spring.
The electorate is furious.--It’s furious with Washington, Wall Street, hedge funds, big banks, lobbyists, fat cats in corner offices—all of them cutting special deals for themselves while average folks are left out. Voters know their real incomes are down. They know their retirements are in jeopardy, their kids are loaded with college debt, and everybody is looking at a tough job market. We are not in a recession, mind you, and employment is actually growing. No matter. All across the country, voters are saying, “We’re mad as hell and we aren’t gonna take it anymore.” That’s why the most damning indictment this year is to be called an “establishment candidate.”*"
- Charles Lipson, Professor of Political Science, University of Chicago.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOf course Obama's hand picked AG is a Team Player, regardless of whatever the FBI comes up with. However should the FBI recommend indictment, and the AG refuses, it will all be out there for the American people to see. None of the shuffling, lying and hiding which is familiar ground for the Clinton's.
There could be resignations by key FBI people, and if you think Hillary's ratings will go up over it , you are dreaming. This entire election is being partially fueled by anger and frustration by the electorate. Anger and frustration against Repubs by Repubs for letting them down, and Repubs against Obama for his dismal performance. Question is when the gavel comes down, will Independents and Dems support Hillary, or will they switch over and support Trump if he is nominated. Plenty of anger and frustration in those ranks also.
Remember immunity has been granted, to the same person that clammed up over Libya and the deaths there under Hillary's watch. How long can Hillary hide the truth from Americans ? I mean , after all, it appears that many truths and secrets were placed out there in Cyberspace for any and all hackers to get their hands on. Hidden from the American people and FOI Laws was Hillary's intent all along. It is so obvious.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Libya is a failed state, according to the top U.S. general in Africa, who said that foreign fighters, weapons and illegal migrants are flowing through the oil-rich North African country, supplying the conflicts in Syria and Iraq with combatants and threatening U.S. allies.
Well, it does matter to Bernie supporters, so the question is how many will get over this and the fact their candidate has been screwed by the Democrat Party to show up to vote for Hillary in November. And if our liberals friends in this forum don't think Trump will use this to his full advantage, then they haven't been paying attention to how he plays the game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHillary's going to have this hanging over her head, not that it matters to Democrats.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Libya is a failed state, according to the top U.S. general in Africa, who said that foreign fighters, weapons and illegal migrants are flowing through the oil-rich North African country, supplying the conflicts in Syria and Iraq with combatants and threatening U.S. allies.
Well, it does matter to Bernie supporters, so the question is how many will get over this and the fact their candidate has been screwed by the Democrat Party to show up to vote for Hillary in November. And if our liberals friends in this forum don't think Trump will use this to his full advantage, then they haven't been paying attention to how he plays the game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
NBC/WSJ poll shows both Clinton and Sanders beating Trump handily in General Election
Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders would handily defeat Donald Trump in a general election match-up, while a clash between Clinton and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz or Florida Sen. Marco Rubio would be a toss-up, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
The poll shows that Trump, who frequently boasts in interviews and campaign appearances that he would beat Clinton in November, would lose a one-on-one contest against her by double digits. In a head-to-head fight, Clinton gets the support of 51 percent of registered voters compared to 38 percent for the real estate mogul.
For Sanders, the margin of victory would be even greater, the poll shows.
The Vermont senator gets 55 percent support in a hypothetical two-person race against Trump, while the GOP front-runner would get just 37 percent.
While Trump remains the front-runner for the GOP nomination, Republicans like former presidential contender Mitt Romney have urged their party's voters to back Cruz or Rubio, whom they say would have a greater chance of defeating the Democratic nominee.
The NBC/WSJ data supports that theory; both Cruz and Rubio would be competitive with the former secretary of state, both running within the margin of error in hypothetical general election battles against Clinton.
In a matchup with Cruz, Clinton would receive the support of 47 percent of registered voters, compared to 45 percent for the Texas senator.
If pitted against Rubio, Clinton and the Florida would tie at 46 percent support apiece, the poll shows.
The poll also shows that voters are split over whether they would consider a third party candidate in the presidential contest.
Forty-six percent of voters surveyed said that they would consider a third-party or independent candidate, while 51 percent said they would not consider it.
On Monday, the most prominent potential independent candidate, former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, shut the door on a 2016 run, saying that he feared his inclusion in the race would ultimately help Trump win the presidency over the Democratic nominee.
The NBC News/ Wall Street Journal poll was conducted March 3-6. The margin of error for all registered voters is +/- 2.83%.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostJust a few of today's headlines. Doesn't look to me as though Obama has done much cleaning up. Quite the opposite in fact.
US generals to lawmakers: Libya a failed state, Iran a long-term threat
https://www.rt.com/usa/334945-milita...-mideast-sasc/
ISIS Detainee Tells U.S. Of Militants' Plan To Use Mustard Gas
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/10/wo...-gas.html?_r=0
ISIS shelled Kurdish-controlled Iraq village with 'poisonous substances'
https://www.rt.com/news/335026-isis-...us-substances/
RELEASE: CAP Report Rings Alarm Bell About Threat of ISIS in Libya
https://www.americanprogress.org/pre...d-defeat-isis/
UK police preparing for 'enormous' potential ISIS attacks, British terror chief says
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/07/europe...aring-attacks/
The Islamic State is degraded but far from being destroyed
"The Islamic State is gradually being degraded, as President Obama pledged. But it still holds large swaths of Syria, Iraq and now Libya — and it maintains a global terror network and a demonstrated willingness to use chemical weapons."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...src=nl_rainbow
And that pretty much sums up all the others.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders would handily defeat Donald Trump in a general election match-up, while a clash between Clinton and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz or Florida Sen. Marco Rubio would be a toss-up, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
The poll shows that Trump, who frequently boasts in interviews and campaign appearances that he would beat Clinton in November, would lose a one-on-one contest against her by double digits. In a head-to-head fight, Clinton gets the support of 51 percent of registered voters compared to 38 percent for the real estate mogul.
For Sanders, the margin of victory would be even greater, the poll shows.
The Vermont senator gets 55 percent support in a hypothetical two-person race against Trump, while the GOP front-runner would get just 37 percent.
While Trump remains the front-runner for the GOP nomination, Republicans like former presidential contender Mitt Romney have urged their party's voters to back Cruz or Rubio, whom they say would have a greater chance of defeating the Democratic nominee.
The NBC/WSJ data supports that theory; both Cruz and Rubio would be competitive with the former secretary of state, both running within the margin of error in hypothetical general election battles against Clinton.
In a matchup with Cruz, Clinton would receive the support of 47 percent of registered voters, compared to 45 percent for the Texas senator.
If pitted against Rubio, Clinton and the Florida would tie at 46 percent support apiece, the poll shows.
The poll also shows that voters are split over whether they would consider a third party candidate in the presidential contest.
Forty-six percent of voters surveyed said that they would consider a third-party or independent candidate, while 51 percent said they would not consider it.
On Monday, the most prominent potential independent candidate, former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, shut the door on a 2016 run, saying that he feared his inclusion in the race would ultimately help Trump win the presidency over the Democratic nominee.
The NBC News/ Wall Street Journal poll was conducted March 3-6. The margin of error for all registered voters is +/- 2.83%.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders would handily defeat Donald Trump in a general election match-up, while a clash between Clinton and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz or Florida Sen. Marco Rubio would be a toss-up, according to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
The poll shows that Trump, who frequently boasts in interviews and campaign appearances that he would beat Clinton in November, would lose a one-on-one contest against her by double digits. In a head-to-head fight, Clinton gets the support of 51 percent of registered voters compared to 38 percent for the real estate mogul.
For Sanders, the margin of victory would be even greater, the poll shows.
The Vermont senator gets 55 percent support in a hypothetical two-person race against Trump, while the GOP front-runner would get just 37 percent.
While Trump remains the front-runner for the GOP nomination, Republicans like former presidential contender Mitt Romney have urged their party's voters to back Cruz or Rubio, whom they say would have a greater chance of defeating the Democratic nominee.
The NBC/WSJ data supports that theory; both Cruz and Rubio would be competitive with the former secretary of state, both running within the margin of error in hypothetical general election battles against Clinton.
In a matchup with Cruz, Clinton would receive the support of 47 percent of registered voters, compared to 45 percent for the Texas senator.
If pitted against Rubio, Clinton and the Florida would tie at 46 percent support apiece, the poll shows.
The poll also shows that voters are split over whether they would consider a third party candidate in the presidential contest.
Forty-six percent of voters surveyed said that they would consider a third-party or independent candidate, while 51 percent said they would not consider it.
On Monday, the most prominent potential independent candidate, former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, shut the door on a 2016 run, saying that he feared his inclusion in the race would ultimately help Trump win the presidency over the Democratic nominee.
The NBC News/ Wall Street Journal poll was conducted March 3-6. The margin of error for all registered voters is +/- 2.83%.
That dog really ain't hunting this time. Hillary beats trump (hardly no one else, NOW at least but it's early) and the swift boating hasn't even started yet.
Wait u til that ridiculous picture of Trumpie in his militAry school boy uniform posing with mummy and daddy. Of course, those mi.itary school fancy boys know how to run when it's time to be a soldier, not play one. How many deferments for Trump?
Deferments, vain about his hands. He's not even a real man
Tee hee
Hillary's negatives cNt really go any lower after twenty-five years of attacks on her from right. Not so with Trump. Blood hasn't even been spilled yet.
Tee hee
Wave election. That's what I'm working toward.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYa, and the polls said Hillary would beat Sanders by 20 points in Michigan. Guess that didn't work out so well.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYa, and the polls said Hillary would beat Sanders by 20 points in Michigan. Guess that didn't work out so well.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Now we flush everything you've said with poll in it for last couple years.....head that sound of flowing water?
Tee hee
Bwah haha
He's so confused he attacks himself from a couple days ago. Weren't you just telling me Hillary had it locked up.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
I'm on the floor laughing ..it's great when you get in adversaries head so much they can't keep things straight for themselves
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha
LMAO
BTW want to k ow why polls were wrong? Underestimated black and uneducated white support for Bernie.
You better hope MI was a fluke.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Hey cons.....the 180s you pull on the polls.....shows you really are just being a-holes. No plan. No ideas. Hoping to spread enough hate to get the "id" vote.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
WINNING
I love the constant focus on hillary's Impending indictment when many are focused on collapse of two party system.
Tee hee
That's PROGRESS ant it cons?
- Quote
Comment
Comment