Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Revolution Academy needs to make some changes.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Not true

    One was cut, unless the injured kid was cut too.
    Some left to play HS and are already committed.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
      Some left to play HS and are already committed.
      There are U15's that are committed?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        There are U15's that are committed?
        No was referring to older kids sorry. U16 that are U18 now.

        Comment


          Revs have turnover....not a big deal, so do clubs.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Revs have turnover....not a big deal, so do clubs.
            The top team in New England has kids leaving in droves. That's a big deal.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered
              The top team in New England has kids leaving in droves. That's a big deal.
              A lot are cuts. Not surprising at all.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                How many players did the U15 team lose? I know a lot left.
                Going into next season this u15 group will face the daunting task of making an 02/03 combined Revs team for 2018-19.

                Several kids will be left behind.

                The Revs make it easy to determine who's safe and who isn't. At least the parents and kids know ahead of time and are able to prepare for a club change.

                Here's the list of U15 players ranked by total playing time percentage so far this year. I've included their position as well.

                1. CD - M - 100%
                2. JM - M - 95.2%
                3. ZS - D - 93.5%
                4. AS - F - 92.7%
                5. MM - D - 84%
                6. EJ - GK - 80%
                7. SW - M - 71%
                8. FV - F -70.5%
                9. JA - D - 62.5%
                10. DM - D - 59.5%
                11. HF - M - 59%

                The above are seemingly safe. It's also interesting to note that the above list has 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 4 mid-fielders and 2 forwards, or a complete team. That's not a coincidence.

                12. CQ - M - 56.7%
                13. CB - M - 49.5%
                14. ZV - F - 42.7%
                15. NC - GK - 40%
                16. CR - D - 31.5%
                17. MF - M - 31.5%

                These final 6 players will not be on the Revs next season. They don't start much and they don't play many minutes even when they come in. They're here for injury relief and to help with practice.

                That's the reality of playing for the Revs.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  A lot are cuts. Not surprising at all.
                  Some can handle DAP and some can't. Not for everyone. Move on.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Going into next season this u15 group will face the daunting task of making an 02/03 combined Revs team for 2018-19.

                    Several kids will be left behind.

                    The Revs make it easy to determine who's safe and who isn't. At least the parents and kids know ahead of time and are able to prepare for a club change.

                    Here's the list of U15 players ranked by total playing time percentage so far this year. I've included their position as well.

                    1. CD - M - 100%
                    2. JM - M - 95.2%
                    3. ZS - D - 93.5%
                    4. AS - F - 92.7%
                    5. MM - D - 84%
                    6. EJ - GK - 80%
                    7. SW - M - 71%
                    8. FV - F -70.5%
                    9. JA - D - 62.5%
                    10. DM - D - 59.5%
                    11. HF - M - 59%

                    The above are seemingly safe. It's also interesting to note that the above list has 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 4 mid-fielders and 2 forwards, or a complete team. That's not a coincidence.

                    12. CQ - M - 56.7%
                    13. CB - M - 49.5%
                    14. ZV - F - 42.7%
                    15. NC - GK - 40%
                    16. CR - D - 31.5%
                    17. MF - M - 31.5%

                    These final 6 players will not be on the Revs next season. They don't start much and they don't play many minutes even when they come in. They're here for injury relief and to help with practice.

                    That's the reality of playing for the Revs.

                    What happened to the '04 who was playing with the team last year?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      What happened to the '04 who was playing with the team last year?
                      Cut cut cut

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        A lot are cuts. Not surprising at all.
                        They would be but 5/6 quit. Would you like me to explain it to you in more detail?

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          Going into next season this u15 group will face the daunting task of making an 02/03 combined Revs team for 2018-19.

                          Several kids will be left behind.

                          The Revs make it easy to determine who's safe and who isn't. At least the parents and kids know ahead of time and are able to prepare for a club change.

                          Here's the list of U15 players ranked by total playing time percentage so far this year. I've included their position as well.

                          1. CD - M - 100%
                          2. JM - M - 95.2%
                          3. ZS - D - 93.5%
                          4. AS - F - 92.7%
                          5. MM - D - 84%
                          6. EJ - GK - 80%
                          7. SW - M - 71%
                          8. FV - F -70.5%
                          9. JA - D - 62.5%
                          10. DM - D - 59.5%
                          11. HF - M - 59%

                          The above are seemingly safe. It's also interesting to note that the above list has 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 4 mid-fielders and 2 forwards, or a complete team. That's not a coincidence.


                          12. CQ - M - 56.7%
                          13. CB - M - 49.5%
                          14. ZV - F - 42.7%
                          15. NC - GK - 40%
                          16. CR - D - 31.5%
                          17. MF - M - 31.5%

                          These final 6 players will not be on the Revs next season. They don't start much and they don't play many minutes even when they come in. They're here for injury relief and to help with practice.

                          That's the reality of playing for the Revs.
                          CD at 100%. My god.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            CD at 100%. My god.
                            He is the most consistent defender

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Cut cut cut
                              Seems like if your goal is to be playing on Revs at U16/17 or U18/19 levels, when scouts/coaches are actually out looking for players, a lot of thought needs to go into when you try jumping over. If a player goes too early, U13-U15, there's a big risk that the Revs will become bored with him after a couple of years and replace him with someone who may not be a better player, but they are hoping has some hidden potential that can be unlocked. You'd rather be the latter.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                Seems like if your goal is to be playing on Revs at U16/17 or U18/19 levels, when scouts/coaches are actually out looking for players, a lot of thought needs to go into when you try jumping over. If a player goes too early, U13-U15, there's a big risk that the Revs will become bored with him after a couple of years and replace him with someone who may not be a better player, but they are hoping has some hidden potential that can be unlocked. You'd rather be the latter.
                                Sophomore year of high school would be optimal.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X