Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Revolution Academy needs to make some changes.
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by UnregisteredThe top team in New England has kids leaving in droves. That's a big deal.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostHow many players did the U15 team lose? I know a lot left.
Several kids will be left behind.
The Revs make it easy to determine who's safe and who isn't. At least the parents and kids know ahead of time and are able to prepare for a club change.
Here's the list of U15 players ranked by total playing time percentage so far this year. I've included their position as well.
1. CD - M - 100%
2. JM - M - 95.2%
3. ZS - D - 93.5%
4. AS - F - 92.7%
5. MM - D - 84%
6. EJ - GK - 80%
7. SW - M - 71%
8. FV - F -70.5%
9. JA - D - 62.5%
10. DM - D - 59.5%
11. HF - M - 59%
The above are seemingly safe. It's also interesting to note that the above list has 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 4 mid-fielders and 2 forwards, or a complete team. That's not a coincidence.
12. CQ - M - 56.7%
13. CB - M - 49.5%
14. ZV - F - 42.7%
15. NC - GK - 40%
16. CR - D - 31.5%
17. MF - M - 31.5%
These final 6 players will not be on the Revs next season. They don't start much and they don't play many minutes even when they come in. They're here for injury relief and to help with practice.
That's the reality of playing for the Revs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostGoing into next season this u15 group will face the daunting task of making an 02/03 combined Revs team for 2018-19.
Several kids will be left behind.
The Revs make it easy to determine who's safe and who isn't. At least the parents and kids know ahead of time and are able to prepare for a club change.
Here's the list of U15 players ranked by total playing time percentage so far this year. I've included their position as well.
1. CD - M - 100%
2. JM - M - 95.2%
3. ZS - D - 93.5%
4. AS - F - 92.7%
5. MM - D - 84%
6. EJ - GK - 80%
7. SW - M - 71%
8. FV - F -70.5%
9. JA - D - 62.5%
10. DM - D - 59.5%
11. HF - M - 59%
The above are seemingly safe. It's also interesting to note that the above list has 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 4 mid-fielders and 2 forwards, or a complete team. That's not a coincidence.
12. CQ - M - 56.7%
13. CB - M - 49.5%
14. ZV - F - 42.7%
15. NC - GK - 40%
16. CR - D - 31.5%
17. MF - M - 31.5%
These final 6 players will not be on the Revs next season. They don't start much and they don't play many minutes even when they come in. They're here for injury relief and to help with practice.
That's the reality of playing for the Revs.
What happened to the '04 who was playing with the team last year?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostGoing into next season this u15 group will face the daunting task of making an 02/03 combined Revs team for 2018-19.
Several kids will be left behind.
The Revs make it easy to determine who's safe and who isn't. At least the parents and kids know ahead of time and are able to prepare for a club change.
Here's the list of U15 players ranked by total playing time percentage so far this year. I've included their position as well.
1. CD - M - 100%
2. JM - M - 95.2%
3. ZS - D - 93.5%
4. AS - F - 92.7%
5. MM - D - 84%
6. EJ - GK - 80%
7. SW - M - 71%
8. FV - F -70.5%
9. JA - D - 62.5%
10. DM - D - 59.5%
11. HF - M - 59%
The above are seemingly safe. It's also interesting to note that the above list has 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 4 mid-fielders and 2 forwards, or a complete team. That's not a coincidence.
12. CQ - M - 56.7%
13. CB - M - 49.5%
14. ZV - F - 42.7%
15. NC - GK - 40%
16. CR - D - 31.5%
17. MF - M - 31.5%
These final 6 players will not be on the Revs next season. They don't start much and they don't play many minutes even when they come in. They're here for injury relief and to help with practice.
That's the reality of playing for the Revs.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCut cut cut
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSeems like if your goal is to be playing on Revs at U16/17 or U18/19 levels, when scouts/coaches are actually out looking for players, a lot of thought needs to go into when you try jumping over. If a player goes too early, U13-U15, there's a big risk that the Revs will become bored with him after a couple of years and replace him with someone who may not be a better player, but they are hoping has some hidden potential that can be unlocked. You'd rather be the latter.
- Quote
Comment
Comment