Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
U12 Boys Thread
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI am surprised that the stars 1st team could not beat the Oakwood second team to advance to the fnals. The MPS team should have beating Oakwood first team, a close game, 2 to 3.
3 take downs of MPS players in the box, one should have resulted in a penalty direct kick, Oakwood got lucky with the ref the whole game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAt least Scorps Premier scored 2 goals against the Crusaders in their loss. Maybe they should exchange the forwards between those two teams.
vs U11-B team, won 3-1
vs U12-B team, won 6-2
vs U11-B team in Sem-Final, won 4-2
vs U12-A team in Final, won 4-1
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBede is a 2nd tier team.
I am not affiliated with Bede. I saw the team play. They are fine. Decent athletes with relatively good skills. Play decent soccer. On par with most of the average "elite" teams out there, including teams from big clubs. Let's face it, the only team far above the others at U12 is the Blazers. And no I am also not affialted with the Blazers.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMPS Crusaders actually played Scorpions Soccer Club teams in 4 our of their 5 games this weekend at Bandits Cup
vs U11-B team, won 3-1
vs U12-B team, won 6-2
vs U11-B team in Sem-Final, won 4-2
vs U12-A team in Final, won 4-1
Not a good sign for the Scorpions.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLove comments like this. When did this happen - years ago? Were they playing 11 v 11? Oh wait, Bolts are a giant club and Bede is small so they must be second tier. How else do you justify the giant fees?
I am not affiliated with Bede. I saw the team play. They are fine. Decent athletes with relatively good skills. Play decent soccer. On par with most of the average "elite" teams out there, including teams from big clubs. Let's face it, the only team far above the others at U12 is the Blazers. And no I am also not affialted with the Blazers.
Bolts A (Teal) are on a similar level as the Blazers. The last game was played at the VW tournament (11v11) where Bolts lost 2-0 in a tight game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBede team lost 5-0 (or 6-0- can't remember exactly) to the Bolts A team in a tournament this past Spring.
Bolts A (Teal) are on a similar level as the Blazers. The last game was played at the VW tournament (11v11) where Bolts lost 2-0 in a tight game.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDose of reality here - Bolts are not on a similar level. Look at the Blazers dominance at every tourney they've played in. Bolts don't come close. Blazers played up at last year's Needham Tourney and won. At that same tourney Bolts tied Easton United, and they were playing in their age group. I'd venture to guess Bolts are closer to Easton than Blazers. Bolts beat Vikings 3-1 at that tourney. Blazers just beat the Vikings 11-0. Bolts just lost 7-3 to Oakwood. Using your logic, someone from Oakwood would be justified calling the Bolts a 2nd tier team.
Different poster here. Have either of you seen these teams play? I have seen Bede team play. They have good athletic skills but soccer skills are not anywhere near the top level that I have seen in MA. The top U12 boys teams I have seen play from MA are Blazers, Bolts, MPS Predator and Western United. It's not just about the final score but how the team plays and the individual skill levels of the players. And I don't think Blazers are at a higher level than any of these other top teams. You can't go by scores alone.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDose of reality here - Bolts are not on a similar level. Look at the Blazers dominance at every tourney they've played in. Bolts don't come close. Blazers played up at last year's Needham Tourney and won. At that same tourney Bolts tied Easton United, and they were playing in their age group. I'd venture to guess Bolts are closer to Easton than Blazers. Bolts beat Vikings 3-1 at that tourney. Blazers just beat the Vikings 11-0. Bolts just lost 7-3 to Oakwood. Using your logic, someone from Oakwood would be justified calling the Bolts a 2nd tier team.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
The Blazers are a very fine team, and I think it is difficult to argue they were not the best team in the state based on last year's results, but one of the previous posters got a little carried away.
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostDose of reality here - Bolts are not on a similar level. Look at the Blazers dominance at every tourney they've played in. Bolts don't come close. Blazers played up at last year's Needham Tourney and won.
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAt that same tourney Bolts tied Easton United, and they were playing in their age group. I'd venture to guess Bolts are closer to Easton than Blazers.
- Quote
Comment
Comment