Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
-
yeah sure. Another delusional fat mom banging away at the keys after a few too many prosecco's. You must be the same Mom that thinks their lumbering back is going D1. Good one -
Relax. Coxon fires up the propaganda machine over the holiday break and loonies like you are about to dump from bridges. Sorry your kid plays at SCPOriginally posted by Unregistered View Post
CFC has been putting 12 to 15 kids into D1 programs every year. Some are going to power conference schools and getting most of it paid for, some are going to Ivy league schools and getting just financial aid and others are good to mid major programs and getting a discount of athletic and academic money. No one is claiming that it's a full ride bonanza but the kids are getting looks and most are landing at schools that are right for them. CFC isn't magic, rather just a platform with connected coaches.Comment
-
-
Hater-aid is being served. Wagner is an FSA expectation. It's all goodOriginally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
just look at the lists these clubs are publishing on FB and other social media. CFC is hands-down better than the other two clubs, it's no contest.
- Afc dadComment
-
coxon wins as biggest windbag in all of CT sports. Well done CFCOriginally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
-
Between the list CFC posted the other day on FB (*=2019 grads, others 2020), plus ECNL PR https://www.soccerwire.com/news/club...e-commitments/Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Boston College (2)*
Louisville*
U Delaware*
Yale (2)
Colgate
SUNY Binghamton
U Penn (2, 1* this year)
Sacred Heart (3)*
Bucknell (2)
Fairfield*
Cornell
UCONN
Michigan
Ohio St *
Georgetown
Quinnipiac*
William and Mary
Northeastern
Providence*
Wake Forest
Weslyan *
U Bridgeport*
FSA seems to have taken down its college commitment link, but according to ECNL list for 2019
Merimack
Clarkson
Marist
CCSU (3)
Yale
Lafayette
VMI
endicott
Both clubs had a few listed as uncommitted as wellComment
-
without a doubt. CFCU at least on the girls side is basically the Matt and Todd show. Outside of seeing names, Coxon really doesn't know most of the players. Those guys have to be cringing now that he's banging away on social media.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
-
CFC has an impressive list. Can anyone speak to how successful the players are once they get there--are they girls able to make an immediate impact or are they sitting the bench for a year or two? Scholarship $ is great not knocking that, but one important measure of successful college placements has to be how the girls do once they are on the team. It's nice pr for the club to be able to say that they have placed a high percentage of players in D1, but if they aren't playing or are getting little playing time then maybe there placements aren't as good as they want everyone to think they are.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
The kids listed above aren’t in college yet, but CFC had a kid playing in the Final 4 this year and a few others in the NCAA Tournament. Also had a couple of All conference players I believe. I’m sure there were a few that didn’t play much, but all are on rosters and most play a decent amount as freshmen.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
The truth of the matter is that any claims of scholarship money, full rides, financial aid, etc. are speculative and basically serve as marketing material. The only proof of anything is an actual copy of an Invoice from an institution of higher education. Few, if any players and/or their families would ever furnish one.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
In regards to playing time and success, one would need to begin by forming a list of placed players as they matriculate , and follow their progress over the next 4 years. As with financial matters, for obvious reasons very few would be interested in having that data released on a continuing basis , so it would be in the hands of others to do the research.Comment
-
simple math - quality not quantity
Oakwood has 1 girls 02 team with 17 players...
cfc has 9 girls 02 teams with, let's say 14 players each, 9 x 14 = 126
so, yes cfc will have "more" commitsComment
-
[QUOTE=Unregistered;2402115]Oakwood has 1 girls 02 team with 17 players...
cfc has 9 girls 02 teams with, let's say 14 players each, 9 x 14 = 126
so, yes cfc will have "more" commits[/QUO
This is an Oakwood thread so I'm not exactly sure how CFC dominates the thread.
I'm not a CFC person but let's clarify. OW actually has two teams for 2002 players. The NPL squad and then the split Academy team which is largely 2002 kids.
CFC has a branch system but once the kids hit high school it's basically their ECNL team, NPL team and then the Wolves. Any other teams are full of kids that scrap for time on their varsity rosters as juniors and seniors.
CT is small state so if we are talking D1 of any level. It's basically FSA ECNL, CFC ECNL, OW and YU (for now). Other programs and B & C teams from the big clubs aren't really putting kids into anything beyond Endicott, Assumption and so on.
As far as your comment is concerned, CFC dominates in both quality and quantity. Power 5 schools, Ivy and a pretty good cross section of other mid majors.Comment
Comment