Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OCYS Consolidated Thread
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, actually your not, and see it doesn't matter how many times people point to the facts you still won't listen to anyone but your purple master. You just want people to believe you know what you are talking about to try to discredit FKK. Sorry, you haven't a clue.
The merger was effective June 1, 2012. CFK's tax year was June 1 - May 31, so the merger was effective at the end of their tax year. CFK received over $100,000 as part of a merger with "another local club." This balance was required to zero out CFK's net asset balance - so prior to the $100,000 they had a negative net asset balance, meaning their total liabilities exceeded their total assets. CFK had no assets other than cash (no receivables) at the end of their tax years ended 5/31/09, 5/31,10, or 5/31/11. The public data doesn't show any asset or liability balances on 5/31/12 because they were absorbed in the merger, but it doesn't seem like they would have any receivables in 2012 if they didn't have them in the previous three years. Even if they did, they were less than the total liabilities.
Can we please stop arguing over this?
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Postadditionally, I think the "$100k" figure is Bull--it. nobody has offered anything but Phil's memo as evidence to back it up. But it sure sounded good to the OC faithful, so $100k it is, Mates.
The correct number is $107,161.
Mate.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostYou are right, the $100,000 number is incorrect (those evil Englishmen!)
The correct number is $107,161.
Mate.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOK, I'm sick of seeing arguments about the $100,000. You do realize that this information is publicly available on the internet at no cost, don't you? It took me about 15 minutes to find it.
The merger was effective June 1, 2012. CFK's tax year was June 1 - May 31, so the merger was effective at the end of their tax year. CFK received over $100,000 as part of a merger with "another local club." This balance was required to zero out CFK's net asset balance - so prior to the $100,000 they had a negative net asset balance, meaning their total liabilities exceeded their total assets. CFK had no assets other than cash (no receivables) at the end of their tax years ended 5/31/09, 5/31,10, or 5/31/11. The public data doesn't show any asset or liability balances on 5/31/12 because they were absorbed in the merger, but it doesn't seem like they would have any receivables in 2012 if they didn't have them in the previous three years. Even if they did, they were less than the total liabilities.
Can we please stop arguing over this?
-1200 players
-ECNL
-Best coaches in Orlando
(forgot about those, didn't ya, Mate?)
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostGB organized a semi secret trial using U12 parents as scouts in order to recruit more 2002 from all over the state, I guess having a u12 purple team full of 2002s plus two U11 purple teams full of 2002s was not enough. Or maybe he was trying to get back at CM for excluding his team last year. In any case it sure looked like they were trying to keep all the U11 purple 2002s from trying out. Some how the word got out and one of the u11 purple teams was allowed to try out.
Big slap in the face of all the U11 purple team players especially the second U11 purple team which has some very good players. In fact the second U11 purple is going to the regional finals while the top purple was eliminated.
Real class act.
In fact the second purple U11 team going to regional finals has nothing to do with the Danone Cup, oh wait it does if you're an U11 Second Pur Parent now doesn't it.....
Want to blame someone find some parents to blame,, and no this isn't GB, it's someone on the outside looking in....
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostWhat's the big deal here. OC paid 100K+ for many players and ECNL. Now that there is a deal. Unfortunate for them that they lost all the top female players after a year, but they will be able to keep ECNL for one more year. I would say OC still benefited more from the merger.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSpeaking of assets-
-1200 players
-ECNL
-Best coaches in Orlando
(forgot about those, didn't ya, Mate?)
I'm not saying that OCYS didn't benefit from the merger, or whether the $100,000 was a good deal or a bad deal. They gained access to additional players, ECNL, and coaches. No one is disputing that. OCYS thought it was worth the money. My post was specifically about whether OCYS paid $100,000 as a part of the merger, because I'm tired of seeing the "Yes, they did!" "No, they didn't!" arguments.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Soon as Beckham opens Miami franchise OCYS will go to sh--
Best players will stay in Miami and That franchises DA academy will run circles around this one w/ regards to how professionally it's run.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI didn't say it was a big deal. I'm tired of seeing people argue over whether OCYS had to pay anything as part of the merger. The evidence is available if you are willing to look for it, so let's just move on to the next subject. I'm assuming that OCYS had full knowledge of the financial condition of CFK when they agreed to the merger, because they would have most likely filed a lawsuit against someone if this was hidden (and they would have been justified in doing so.) OCYS obviously thought it was worth the money, otherwise they wouldn't have done it.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, I didn't forget about those. Those aren't listed on CFK's public financial reports, because they aren't assets. The players represent potential future revenues, and CFK would have had to incur expenses in order to earn those revenues (and OCYS did incur expenses to earn those revenues). They are not assets. It is absurd to say, "Well, those players would have paid us $900,000 next year, so we should include that as an asset, but forget about the $1,000,000 of expenses that we would have incurred to earn those player fees." ECNL is a league that CFK was a member of - not an asset. The "Best coaches in Orlando" have to be paid to perform their services - not an asset.
I'm not saying that OCYS didn't benefit from the merger, or whether the $100,000 was a good deal or a bad deal. They gained access to additional players, ECNL, and coaches. No one is disputing that. OCYS thought it was worth the money. My post was specifically about whether OCYS paid $100,000 as a part of the merger, because I'm tired of seeing the "Yes, they did!" "No, they didn't!" arguments.
If players, the league affiliation and the coaching staff were not considered "assets" by Phil and Co. (though not assets on the balance sheet), then there would have been no acquisition of CFK. Businessmen have to take other things into consideration- maybe you would have booked it as "goodwill", or ignored these factors altogether- I can't say. but I GUARANTEE Phil saw these things as assets, just as he looked at FSA and saw "fields".
Bottom line is- all this feigned "surprise" from OC about $100k liability from CFK and how they were forced to "bail them out" is a bunch of baloney. As you correctly point out, they made the deal, they liked the deal, they signed the deal.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSoon as Beckham opens Miami franchise OCYS will go to sh--
Best players will stay in Miami and That franchises DA academy will run circles around this one w/ regards to how professionally it's run.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI can see where you're coming from- the "green eye shade" perspective.
If players, the league affiliation and the coaching staff were not considered "assets" by Phil and Co. (though not assets on the balance sheet), then there would have been no acquisition of CFK. Businessmen have to take other things into consideration- maybe you would have booked it as "goodwill", or ignored these factors altogether- I can't say. but I GUARANTEE Phil saw these things as assets, just as he looked at FSA and saw "fields".
Bottom line is- all this feigned "surprise" from OC about $100k liability from CFK and how they were forced to "bail them out" is a bunch of baloney. As you correctly point out, they made the deal, they liked the deal, they signed the deal.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, I didn't forget about those. Those aren't listed on CFK's public financial reports, because they aren't assets. The players represent potential future revenues, and CFK would have had to incur expenses in order to earn those revenues (and OCYS did incur expenses to earn those revenues). They are not assets. It is absurd to say, "Well, those players would have paid us $900,000 next year, so we should include that as an asset, but forget about the $1,000,000 of expenses that we would have incurred to earn those player fees." ECNL is a league that CFK was a member of - not an asset. The "Best coaches in Orlando" have to be paid to perform their services - not an asset.
I'm not saying that OCYS didn't benefit from the merger, or whether the $100,000 was a good deal or a bad deal. They gained access to additional players, ECNL, and coaches. No one is disputing that. OCYS thought it was worth the money. My post was specifically about whether OCYS paid $100,000 as a part of the merger, because I'm tired of seeing the "Yes, they did!" "No, they didn't!" arguments.
- Quote
Comment
Comment