Originally posted by Guest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2012/13 Age Groups
Collapse
X
-
Guest replied
- Quote
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
Without “their 4 players”? They aren’t their players, they are 2011 players, and that’s not changing anytime soon. So yeah I think it’s a pointless exercise and nothing to brag about.
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
You are full of crap, all these teams will have an advantage against any team who didn’t do the same.
CSA Lacey didn’t win a game and PDA blue won a ton in the opposite divisions last year. This spring exact opposite. This is for experience at 9v9. Get a grip and don’t worry about other people while your kid is out there winning 9-0 against garbage teams bc the competition left
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
If FA play Matchfit without their 4 players then Fa is winning but if FA play Matchfit with the 4 players they are losing. It’s the truth no “hypothetical” predictions. Today these NJ teams aren’t doing as expected, MF 2013’s shouldve won Lehigh, Real should’ve beat/tied Delco, FA losing 6-0 to Keystone is kind of surprising but Keystone are a good team. FA losing to Albertson #1 in NY for 2012’s is reasonable. Also keep in mind some of these teams probably brought guest players that’s why maybe some of these scores are surprising.
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
”Success” playing a year up is actually competing against the older kids which means sometimes winning and only losing by 1-2 goals. The point of playing a year up is useless if you’re not at least top 3 in the state in that age group. Like I said teams such as CSA Lacey, Real, and Cheshire are doing pretty good playing a year up. CSA Lacey won 5 and tied 2, Real won 6 and lost 1 by only 1 goal, and Cheshire won 1 game and tied 3. MF, CSA Lacey, and PDA at this age group are Premier 2 level if they play a year up.
CSA Lacey didn’t win a game and PDA blue won a ton in the opposite divisions last year. This spring exact opposite. This is for experience at 9v9. Get a grip and don’t worry about other people while your kid is out there winning 9-0 against garbage teams bc the competition left
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View PostMFA are actually playing good teams down in Delco and look at their results. The FA teams are never their real team either way because they bring guest players to every tournament that they play. The coach knows they can’t compete so why play top flight in big tournaments?
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedJust wait until they go 9v9. MFA can’t have only1-2 strong players playing 9v9 and get away with it at 7v7. Not that they are doing well this weekend.
Originally posted by Guest View PostMFA are actually playing good teams down in Delco and look at their results. The FA teams are never their real team either way because they bring guest players to every tournament that they play. The coach knows they can’t compete so why play top flight in big tournaments?
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedI am assuming this is their 13 team
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedMFA are actually playing good teams down in Delco and look at their results. The FA teams are never their real team either way because they bring guest players to every tournament that they play. The coach knows they can’t compete so why play top flight in big tournaments?
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
Define “…been successful”? What does success look like when playing a year up?
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
Define “…been successful”? What does success look like when playing a year up?
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
There are “should haves” like I said. Playing a year up hasnt been successful for everyone look at teams such as PDA, Crush, Boca, SJEB, and Torpedoes. Was successful for CSA Lacey, Cheshire, and Real. If they played up they would play Premier 2 Red but the thing is MF 2012’s B team plays Premier 2 so that’s probably why. I don’t really understand the point of playing a year up in leagues and tournaments just play your own age unless your team is really good and could compete against the older teams. EDP should’ve just made a 9v9 2013G League with all the good teams.
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
Very reasonable deductive analysis I concur with your submission.
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
If FA play Matchfit without their 4 players then Fa is winning but if FA play Matchfit with the 4 players they are losing. It’s the truth no “hypothetical” predictions. Today these NJ teams aren’t doing as expected, MF 2013’s shouldve won Lehigh, Real should’ve beat/tied Delco, FA losing 6-0 to Keystone is kind of surprising but Keystone are a good team. FA losing to Albertson #1 in NY for 2012’s is reasonable. Also keep in mind some of these teams probably brought guest players that’s why maybe some of these scores are surprising.
Very reasonable deductive analysis I concur with your submission.
- Quote
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Guest View Post
There are no “should haves”; you perform or are outperformed. MF 2013 chose to spend their spring season beating up on futures teams in 7v7 rather than playing up against stronger 2012 competition.
- Quote
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: