Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

His job approval numbers are still in the low 40s and 90% of republicans think he's doing a good job handling the crisis. But considering his strength is in red states with fewer cases (so far) those opinions will chance in the next few weeks. Also, all it will take is peeling off some independents and getting back the anti Hillary voters for Trump to lose. The crisis will make that very easy to do. That is why Biden is crushing it now - everyone knows a moderate Dem has a way better chance to do that then Bernie.

That said, never say never with the EC; that's why making sure Congress goes fully blue is critical

60 seats would be nice but fillibuster may need to go at beginning of next term - can’t let cons hold back the rebuilding our nation will need

RCP at -8.5. 538 -9.8. All important DOW poll saying Trump re-election in trouble

[Unregistered]

Why don’t you address the points in the post directly ? Or can’t you ?

Have you down for the latter.

Also PROVE you aren’t OP otherwise you assert facts that just can’t be in evidence

I have no need to prove anything. A question was posed (not by me) and I watched your attacks start as you try to shape the conversation on here as always. Some days, I read and chuckle at people like you, other days I call you out.

Today's the latter.

Th question posed certainly seemed interesting to me. Sorry if you don't feel that way, why don't you just ignore it.

"Check out the big brain on Brad!"

[Unregistered]

60 seats would be nice but fillibuster may need to go at beginning of next term - can’t let cons hold back the rebuilding our nation will need

RCP at -8.5. 538 -9.8. All important DOW poll saying Trump re-election in trouble

Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.

[Unregistered]

Got it. You attack a group of people (mistakenly attribute it to the wrong group of people) get called out on it, and then whine behind the "ad hominem attack" line again.

Can resend the agenda on what YOU want to talk about that WE all have to fall in line to?

Talk about someone trying to structure the message...sounds like possibly we have a Chinese mole on our hands here.

Please keep ^^^^ up and continue acting like a weak little 😢 👶. Again I trust the vast majority of readers to come to the correct conclusions. That’s a lib thing. Generally like my fellow humans

[Unregistered]

Please keep ^^^^ up and continue acting like a weak little 😢 👶. Again I trust the vast majority of readers to come to the correct conclusions. That’s a lib thing. Generally like my fellow humans

"Me, myself, and I" = A majority to Tee Hee. Not even going to count his evil demons he struggles with

[Unregistered]

I have no need to prove anything. A question was posed (not by me) and I watched your attacks start as you try to shape the conversation on here as always. Some days, I read and chuckle at people like you, other days I call you out.

Today's the latter.

Th question posed certainly seemed interesting to me. Sorry if you don't feel that way, why don't you just ignore it.

"Check out the big brain on Brad!"

Look I’ve been telling the readers here that whenever you are shown to be wrong on the facts you pivot and attack me and everyone reading this thread can see and decide accordingly.

All your going to get from me other than a tireless recitation of the real facts about the virus and science around it. People are curious and want the info. Now how about I suggest you address the readers with your “facts” and I’ll do same. Unless you can’t then everyone will see you attack again.

[Unregistered]

"no nation" during the Great War (WW1) germans used mustard gas and other chemical weapons that killed the enemy as well as there own soldiers.

During the Civil War on many occasions the North pointed cannons into the battle field where northern and southern soldiers alike were killed (it was basic math, the north had way more soldiers to spare).

don't give us any BS what you think a country "would" or "would not" do as you are insignificant commoner and not "in the know" .

^^^^ ad hominem attack #1

[Unregistered]

Not the OP, but Jeezus H Chryst stop with the agenda-setting already. It's so tiring having to read what you want to talk about and the mockery if something else comes along.

I get you are used to talking to yourself all day in the basement, but the rest of us are versed in talking about various things and various topics and can handle it.

Unreal.

^^^ ad hominem attack #2

[Unregistered]

Like an arrogant azzhole who wants to talk down, not to, anyone?

Understood.

It's OK to float Trump theories all the time, but when someone floats something different, panties get wadded up.

^^^^ ad hominem attack #3

[Unregistered]

makes no difference and your attempt at "the spin" is poor.

You said a country would not attack there own people....I simply showed you two examples (out of many others) in history where they would. (does it really matter if it was a gun, knife, gas, cannon ball, arrows, ect?).

Yes the dynamics of an infectious agent are that completely different. Sure if you think it through you will be able to understand. If you still can’t figure out the differences yourself ask and we can discuss .

Trying to be helpful

[Unregistered]

Look I’ve been telling the readers here that whenever you are shown to be wrong on the facts you pivot and attack me and everyone reading this thread can see and decide accordingly.

All your going to get from me other than a tireless recitation of the real facts about the virus and science around it. People are curious and want the info. Now how about I suggest you address the readers with your “facts” and I’ll do same. Unless you can’t then everyone will see you attack again.

What you don't get is your complete, arrogant, disregard for a question asked. A talking point. Something to take up the day. There's ways to use your expertise for the greater good, to impart knowledge, and there are ways to pump up your own skull. You always choose the latter. It's a defense mechanism, likely due to some other failings that you need to try to even out.

I never disputed the likelihood the original post was incorrect. I just chimed in to take you down a notch. I never saw anyone state any "facts". I also don't see where you have definitively said it couldn't have been propagated with some evil pretense after to get back at Trump. You stated the origins of the virus as factual, which I agree with. The rest is conjecture, which I may or may not agree with.

I do think your insistent arrogant protest makes you at the minimum, a Chinese sympathizer. Possibly even a mole. What would the equivalent of "Bore-us" be?

Let's go with "Wang lei"

[Unregistered]

"Me, myself, and I" = A majority to Tee Hee. Not even going to count his evil demons he struggles with

^^^^ ad hominem attack #4

[Unregistered]

"Attack a group of people" = OK
"Reply back to the individual" = Not OK

Wang lei

[Unregistered]

What you don't get is your complete, arrogant, disregard for a question asked. A talking point. Something to take up the day. There's ways to use your expertise for the greater good, to impart knowledge, and there are ways to pump up your own skull. You always choose the latter. It's a defense mechanism, likely due to some other failings that you need to try to even out.

I never disputed the likelihood the original post was incorrect. I just chimed in to take you down a notch. I never saw anyone state any "facts". I also don't see where you have definitively said it couldn't have been propagated with some evil pretense after to get back at Trump. You stated the origins of the virus as factual, which I agree with. The rest is conjecture, which I may or may not agree with.

I do think your insistent arrogant protest makes you at the minimum, a Chinese sympathizer. Possibly even a mole. What would the equivalent of "Bore-us" be?

Let's go with "Wang lei"

^^^^ ad hominem #5

Like Trump , he has to grudgingly admit that someone does know better than he does but then immediately just finds another way to attack.

So I will address the con directly and ask for an answer and other readers can watch .....

Where did the H1N1 swine flu originate ?

Let’s make it multiple choice for the con....

1) China
2) Viet Nam
3) USA
4) Germany

We might as well learn some relevant facts while we shelter

[Unregistered]

“I just chimes in to take you down a notch.”

^^^ from my con “admirer.”

Dear readers,

I’ve long said that you just need to listen to what they say and they come right out and show you what they are about. The con is here just to try to p’own the Libs. He told you that. Knew the OP wasn’t accurate but ....

Just keep them talking to and listen. They give it all up.