Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

17 posts from you in the hour since you posted ^^^^ ?

Your boy Donnie is on a tweet rant today as well.

Why so unsettled? I mean who’s clutching pearls again?

😂😂😂😂

Fight for political his Life cons!

Nope, not me. Been in a meeting.

Just got back and reading how poorly it's going. The mind-numbing droning on is turning off the moderates.

Good times.

[Unregistered]

Nope, not me. Been in a meeting.

Just got back and reading how poorly it's going. The mind-numbing droning on is turning off the moderates.

Good times.

Really ?

Here’s one of your Fox boys. Sounds like a turncoat 😂

Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano’s latest column explains why President Donald Trump’s actions are worthy of impeachment — and he shames any Republican senators who have already made up their minds.

Napolitano starts by making the case that there is enough evidence to credibly charge the president with crimes, even though Democrats in the House only impeached him for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.


“Federal election laws proscribe as criminal the mere solicitation of help for a political campaign from a foreign national or government,” he writes. “There is no dispute that Trump did this. In fact, the case for this is stronger now than it was when the House impeached him last year. Since then, more evidence, which Trump tried to suppress, has come to light.”

Napolitano also argues that obstructing Congress is a real crime, as former professional baseball pitcher Roger Clemens was charged with, and ultimately acquitted of, obstructing Congress.

He then writes that Trump should take these charges seriously — and admonishes any Republicans who have told Trump that they plan on voting to acquit him before hearing any evidence.

“It leaves us with valid, lawful, constitutional arguments for Trump’s impeachment that he ought to take seriously,” he writes. “That is, unless he knows he will be acquitted because Republican senators have told him so. Whoever may have whispered that into his ear is unworthy of sitting as a juror and has violated the oath of ‘impartial justice’ and fidelity to the Constitution and the law.”

Of course FUX won’t allow Napolitano in the air as a “legal expert” we have Trey Gowdy

Trey Gowdy ....whose committee questioned HRC for 11 h and then wrote a report exonerating her.

Can Trump appear and answer questions ? Why not? Smaller stones than HRC?

[Unregistered]

Nope, not me. Been in a meeting.

Just got back and reading how poorly it's going. The mind-numbing droning on is turning off the moderates.

Good times.

Ok .....

SOME con followed YOUR post with all those posts within an hour....is that a better reflection on your 🥜 🥜 🥜 ty tribe ?

[Unregistered]

Dream on Cons. Trump ain’t getting re-elected with an approval rating of 40-41%, which is where it’s been stuck forever. You guys will have to pray for significant foreign meddling. Again.

Obama was at 45% at the same time....with a lapdog press and the fawning elites.

Methinks Trump 2020 is a virtual lock! So do the Dems, that is why this impeachment thing is going on. A hail mary!

[Unregistered]

Ok .....

SOME con followed YOUR post with all those posts within an hour....is that a better reflection on your 🥜 🥜 🥜 ty tribe ?

So, let's talk this through...

If I DO post often, your panties get knotted as it's too much (less than you, but we know the rules don't apply across the board).

If I DON'T post often, then it must be a tribe doing the posting and your panties still get knotted up.

Moral of the story: Much of your curmudgeoness is due to your panties being knotted up all the time.

[Unregistered]

Trump set a new record yesterday. 140+ tweets/retweets.
Wacko.

He wants to protect the American who invented the wheel. huh? He also said about Elon Musk “He’s also doing the rockets, he likes rockets, and he does good at rockets, too" https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump...b6779e9c2d1b2f

I swear he has dementia. My old man has it now. Trump's got so many signs of it. Best case is he's just a toddler with the mean streak of a middle school girl who can't stay off Twitter.

[Unregistered]

Here's the problem Democrats have according to Napolitano. John Bolton's testimony comes under Executive Privilege which Trump may or may not waive. The Bidens have no such privilege.

Bolton isn't a staff member any longer. From what I've read legally he can testify on anything other than issues of national security (which no doubt Trump would claim "everything" was a matter of national security). In that cases he could meet with those on the Senate national security committee behind closed doors.

[Unregistered]

You don't like the CNN report? How about CNBC?

Joe Biden’s son Hunter ordered to Arkansas court for contempt hearing in paternity case
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/22/hunt...nity-case.html

And Trump's kids were helping to defraud a charity. Who cares. I don't care about Hunter Biden, or Trump's kids other than one of them works in the WH with her husband, both completely unqualified for whatever so called jobs they do.

[Unregistered]

Obama was at 45% at the same time....with a lapdog press and the fawning elites.

Methinks Trump 2020 is a virtual lock! So do the Dems, that is why this impeachment thing is going on. A hail mary!

Obama’s approval was at 48% just before the 2012 election. You think Trump’s approval is going to jump 6% by election time (needs to be mid to high 40’s to have a chance)? It’s been mired in the low 40’s since day one (and, no, Rasmussen doesn’t count.) It has hardly budged because everyone’s pretty much decided about him.

But Dream On! Lol

[Unregistered]

So, let's talk this through...

If I DO post often, your panties get knotted as it's too much (less than you, but we know the rules don't apply across the board).

If I DON'T post often, then it must be a tribe doing the posting and your panties still get knotted up.

Moral of the story: Much of your curmudgeoness is due to your panties being knotted up all the time.

Here’s the moral of the story - you and the cons dodging reality about the criminal president

Nadler just played tapes of Lindsey saying things that undercut trumps position ....

Did Lindsey slump down in his chair ? No! Lindsey stormed out of the chamber BEFORE that.

You guys really expect to win out when you are THAT weak and think skinned? Like you spending time denying 🥜 ter posts on this forum?

You are funny .....cons are melting down in DC.....

By tomorrow night when the Dems finish up trump may have a stroke

[Unregistered]

And Trump's kids were helping to defraud a charity. Who cares. I don't care about Hunter Biden, or Trump's kids other than one of them works in the WH with her husband, both completely unqualified for whatever so called jobs they do.

I beg to differ with a fellow Lib here

I do care that the grifter family thieved money that people donated thinking kids with cancer would benefit from it rather than the donnies, Eric, and ivanka

LOCK THEM UP!

[Unregistered]

^^^ Word Salad


Geeze, the hypocrite just keeps digging. Rifles off a half-dozen posts in just a few minutes.

[Unregistered]

Obama’s approval was at 48% just before the 2012 election. You think Trump’s approval is going to jump 6% by election time (needs to be mid to high 40’s to have a chance)? It’s been mired in the low 40’s since day one (and, no, Rasmussen doesn’t count.) It has hardly budged because everyone’s pretty much decided about him.

But Dream On! Lol

https://news.gallup.com/interactives...al-center.aspx

Look it up for yourself.

Obama was at 45-46%. And he won going away. Your serve.

[Unregistered]

I beg to differ with a fellow Lib here

I do care that the grifter family thieved money that people donated thinking kids with cancer would benefit from it rather than the donnies, Eric, and ivanka

LOCK THEM UP!

Who let Jerry Nadler on here? Pull your pants down and put down that sandwich. You don't want to balloon up again.

[Unregistered]

^^^ Word Salad


Geeze, the hypocrite just keeps digging. Rifles off a half-dozen posts in just a few minutes.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

You’ve lost it .....

Have some reality ....now realize this is where it stands TODAY and it never gets better for Trump only worse

Jan 22 (Reuters) - A bipartisan majority of Americans want to see new witnesses testify in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, and the public appears to be largely following the proceedings even after a bruising congressional inquiry that lasted several months, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling released Wednesday.

The poll, which ran from Jan. 17-22, also showed that U.S. public opinion has moved little since the U.S. House of Representatives impeached Trump in mid-December.

About 44% of adults in the United States say Trump should be removed from office, another 15% say he should be reprimanded formally with a congressional censure, and 31% said the charges should be dismissed.

Would you like another scoop?

😂😂😂😂😂

I thought so .....

72% want witnesses !