Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

All the ire is on the right. Trump wants him drawn and quartered along with other "traitors" and "enemies." Everyone else just wants to see the damm report.

You forget. Trump was once a Democrat. His emotional side exposes that.

[Unregistered]

You forget. Trump was once a Democrat. His emotional side exposes that.

[i]They’ll fail to acknowledge that an innocent man knows on day one that no evidence will be uncovered. If that innocent man is the president of the United States, the charge is treason, and the investigation is about to enter its third year, one would expect that innocent man to have a fairly dynamic opinion as to the legitimacy of the investigation. Add that common behavioral expectation to Trump’s turbo-charged behavioral pattern and you’ve got yourself two years of angry tweets.

http://thefederalist.com/2019/03/24/..._AhYEOaiO46o4U

[Unregistered]

Fox did as well. Benjamins all around. Maybe both sides will start doing actual journalism.

Even Taibbi says you can thank conservative media for not buying into the BS.

[Unregistered]

Curious...were the Dems hoping this would just drag through 2020 and they could keep up the talking points? Do you think they were actually surprised it ended so soon, and they lost basically their entire platform over the last two years and have nothing going forward?

So many reports now admitting they had 'bad information' or 'time to move on' etc. lead me to believe they threw all their eggs into this one basket. They had to have been very, very, VERY sure it was a slam dunk, otherwise their hope would be just to drag it out and let the public opinion be judge and jury (as it typically how they work).


Whether they truly believed what they were saying is up for debate. But, if they weren't all-in, they have to be thinking how they just blew the election, no?

If you think the lib media will change, as they should as a result of this, you are wrong, wrong, wrong.

[Unregistered]

Mueller isn’t going to defy Jerry Nadler’s subpoena to defend Trump. That’s when the fun starts.

I’m looking forward to that and other things. It’s now clear this report is VERY BAD for Trump.

See ya!

Dream dream, even for a little while
Dream dream, filling up an idle hour

[Unregistered]

Who "told" us that? The same liberal media that has misled the country throughout this whole thing? Do you think there any more believable now when even their own are questioning their credibility? Be serious TMan. Wake up and smell the coffee. You libs have backed yourself in a corner that will be hard to get out of especially when you offer presidential candidates who support things like infanticide, eliminating the electoral college, giving the vote to illegals and 16 year olds, ignoring the rule of law. It's your party that will have to depend on the uneducated masses of your bad urban schools to pull it off.

Left based New York Daily News

One catches a palpable sense of the latter as both progressive and mainstream Democrats seek to reform the norms and institutions of American politics that do not currently sit in their favor. Pack the courts, lower the voting age, disband the Electoral College and do away with equal representation of states in the Senate, comes the cry from progressive and even moderate elements of the party. In agitating for change, however, Democrats’ true aims are laid bare: when political institutions work in Democrats’ favor, they are sacrosanct. When those institutions favor Republicans, however, they are archaic, unfair and in dire need of replacement.

https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/...-2VKxrArfXtCCQ

[Unregistered]

Even Taibbi says you can thank conservative media for not buying into the BS.

Not that they bought into it but they used it nonetheless.

[Unregistered]

Left based New York Daily News

One catches a palpable sense of the latter as both progressive and mainstream Democrats seek to reform the norms and institutions of American politics that do not currently sit in their favor. Pack the courts, lower the voting age, disband the Electoral College and do away with equal representation of states in the Senate, comes the cry from progressive and even moderate elements of the party. In agitating for change, however, Democrats’ true aims are laid bare: when political institutions work in Democrats’ favor, they are sacrosanct. When those institutions favor Republicans, however, they are archaic, unfair and in dire need of replacement.

https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/...-2VKxrArfXtCCQ

^^^^^^^^^

"Democrats find themselves trapped between an increasingly frenzied base and their own dynastic hubris. Painful as it may be, however, progressives must recognize that, yes, Republicans will sometimes outmaneuver Democrats and that conservative governance is not inherently illegitimate. Otherwise, Democrats risk pushing themselves to the extremes and dooming their chances of victory in 2020."

[Unregistered]

[i]They’ll fail to acknowledge that an innocent man knows on day one that no evidence will be uncovered. If that innocent man is the president of the United States, the charge is treason, and the investigation is about to enter its third year, one would expect that innocent man to have a fairly dynamic opinion as to the legitimacy of the investigation. Add that common behavioral expectation to Trump’s turbo-charged behavioral pattern and you’ve got yourself two years of angry tweets.

http://thefederalist.com/2019/03/24/..._AhYEOaiO46o4U

In fact there's a case moving forward about his blocking dissenters on his Twitter account. Since he uses Twitter to communicate his positions and policies (government) blocking people he doesn't like can (possibly) be considered blocking free speech. Even his own followers wish he'd tweet less and do more.

[Unregistered]

Not that they bought into it but they used it nonetheless.

Someone had to contradict the BS the libs were getting rich on selling. ESPECIALLY when outnumbered something like 10 to 1.

[Unregistered]

So at the end of day one ...riddle me this ....

Barr has already told us that Mueller’s view and his was the report DID NOT exonerate POTUS.

Exonerate him from what? As usual this seems a question libs never ask.

So much like we did during watergate when we had another SPecial counsel, Jaworski, vs a special prosecutor like Ken Starr , the real fun times didn’t get going until the senate select committee undertook public hearings . Jaworski fed them his findings . Was ordered to by SC as I recall 😊

Whataboutism.

It ain't the 70s anymore, TMan. Jaworski was a Democrat as were five of the SC justices Democrats (Douglas, Brennan, White, Marshall, Powell) while there were just three Republicans (Burger), Stewart, Blackmun). Rehnquist, a Republican, recused himself since he had previously served in the Nixon administration. The count today is 5 Republicans to 4 Democrats and remember two of those Republicans have had to deal with their own Democrat led witch hunts.

Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler will be sharing the role played by Sam nunn.

Oh there is why he is on the attack before we even get details of report ...getting the lickspittles fired up.

So obvious but not going to change a thing . Will be ugly though . Probably gonna take a few generations to stop turn in all around

Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Gerald Nadler (D-N.Y.) are poised to ignore the report and to stir up years of new investigations. This kind of raw partisanship, after the largest criminal investigation of a campaign and an administration in history, has no place in our democracy. It’s an abuse of power without precedent. The Mueller investigation systematically went after everyone named in the Steele dossier, using the toughest possible tactics. Rather than investigate the crime, they investigated the people, finding unrelated crimes to use as leverage to squeeze out any potential drops of evidence related to collusion. They got every email of the transition; they looked through every communication by everyone through every means, including tapping secret messaging apps. - Mark Penn, whose experience includes helping to defend President Clinton from impeachment in 1998

[Unregistered]

Exonerate him from what? As usual this seems a question libs never ask.



Whataboutism.

It ain't the 70s anymore, TMan. Jaworski was a Democrat as were five of the SC justices Democrats (Douglas, Brennan, White, Marshall, Powell) while there were just three Republicans (Burger), Stewart, Blackmun). Rehnquist, a Republican, recused himself since he had previously served in the Nixon administration. The count today is 5 Republicans to 4 Democrats and remember two of those Republicans have had to deal with their own Democrat led witch hunts.




Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Gerald Nadler (D-N.Y.) are poised to ignore the report and to stir up years of new investigations. This kind of raw partisanship, after the largest criminal investigation of a campaign and an administration in history, has no place in our democracy. It’s an abuse of power without precedent. The Mueller investigation systematically went after everyone named in the Steele dossier, using the toughest possible tactics. Rather than investigate the crime, they investigated the people, finding unrelated crimes to use as leverage to squeeze out any potential drops of evidence related to collusion. They got every email of the transition; they looked through every communication by everyone through every means, including tapping secret messaging apps. - Mark Penn, whose experience includes helping to defend President Clinton from impeachment in 1998

Schiff has no business chairing this committee. In fact he shouldn't even been on this committee. He's been outright lying for two years. He and his buddy, Swalwell, have been prattling on to the media that they had seen “plenty of evidence” that proved collusion. They need to prove it or STFU.

House Intelligence Republican calls for Adam Schiff to resign as chairman
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...gn-as-chairman

Can't believe these two bozos were government prosecutors. But then they are from California, so what would anyone expect. I wonder how much Schiff parents had to pay to get the little weasel into Stanford and Harvard.

Swalwell has a creepy slimeball face much like that ambulance chaser Avenatti.

[Unregistered]

Schiff has no business chairing this committee. In fact he shouldn't even been on this committee. He's been outright lying for two years. He and his buddy, Swalwell, have been prattling on to the media that they had seen “plenty of evidence” that proved collusion. They need to prove it or STFU.

House Intelligence Republican calls for Adam Schiff to resign as chairman
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...gn-as-chairman

Can't believe these two bozos were government prosecutors. But then they are from California, so what would anyone expect. I wonder how much Schiff parents had to pay to get the little weasel into Stanford and Harvard.

Swalwell has a creepy slimeball face much like that ambulance chaser Avenatti.

Michael
Avenatti
Got
Arrested

Bwahahaha!

[Unregistered]

Michael
Avenatti
Got
Arrested

Bwahahaha!

Wanted to make sure you saw this over here

The case is Haldeman v. Sirica, a 1974 D.C. appellate decision which found that a lower court had correctly allowed a grand jury to send its report — and underlying evidence — to the House Judiciary Committee.

^^^^^ gonna take a while to percolate

Gonna be 🔥

[Unregistered]

Whoa! Smollett gets off and Rahm is pi$$!!! He's comparing this to people who pay to get their kids into college.