Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

It's pretty obvious reading what McCarthy said that he recognizes this as most definitely a political witch hunt out to get Trump. The double standard exhibited ought to make any sane person want to puke and I'm not just speaking to that one incident where the Obama administration had a $2 million campaign violation.

- Could not the U.S. government long ago, without the prompt of a special counsel, have uncovered that Michael Cohen did not fully pay his taxes—in the manner of an Al Sharpton, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle?"

- How is Michael Cohen any different than former Bill Clinton crony and fixer Vernon Jordan who sought to keep Monica Lewinsky quiet by arranging a quid pro quo $40,000 a year job with Revlon in New York, via Clinton friend, Revlon CEO Ron Perelman—all with impunity?

- By all means, let us jail Cohen for subverting the entire foundation of our legal system that must rely on honest testimonies in all government inquiries. The DOJ should be charging James Clapper for lying under oath when he deliberately misled congress about NSA surveillance and CIA director, John Brennan, who lied about drone collateral damage, CIA surveillance of Senate staff computers, and has misrepresented his efforts with then-Senator Harry Reid to seed the Steele dossier. Following that indictments of former FBI director James Comey and his deputy director, Andrew McCabe, for making false statements to federal investigators and Congress, given their respective testimonies under oath about leaking to the press and the role of the Steele dossier in FISA warrants cannot be reconciled.

- If we are going to be tossing around indicting Trump associates on the basis of the Logan Act seems John Kerry’s secretive meetings this year with the Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif comes under the same. And maybe we should even go back as far as 2008 when then senator and candidate Obama were rumored to be in contact with Iraqis.

- If General Flynn, can be charged for not registering as a foreign agent, than so should Bill Clinton and Tony Podesta, and probably thousands of other wheeler dealers in Washington.

- Why has Mueller ignored Obama administration crimes of leaking the contents of classified telephone conversations between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and revealing the identity of Flynn as a party to those conversations. A written request must be made to the collecting agency and only a handful of officials are given that authority. Both James Clapper and Sally Yates agreed there is a record of the name of the requestor in a May 2017 hearing. Why hasn't this person been brought to account?

- Mueller is authorized to investigate any crime he finds in the course of the “collusion” investigation. He has had no problem charging Paul Manafort for decades-old tax crimes and looking into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions. Yet the crimes against Flynn have been ignored. Why?"

Add this to the list.

"Jerry Nadler, the Democrat who will chair the House Judiciary Committee, said the campaign finance charges "would be impeachable offenses because, even though they were committed before the president became president, they were committed in the service of fraudulently obtaining the office." Nadler said he has still not determined whether the charges, even though they could be the basis for impeachment, are important enough to actually go forward, at least yet.

Nadler's public caution is understandable.... One significant problem could be that the campaign finance charge against the president is a pretty iffy case. Back in 2010, the Justice Department accused 2008 presidential candidate John Edwards of a similar scheme — an alleged campaign finance violation based on a payoff to a woman with whom Edwards had had an affair (and a child).

Edwards said he arranged the payment to save his reputation and hide the affair from his wife. The Justice Department said it was to influence the outcome of a presidential election.

The New York Times called the Edwards indictment "a case that had no precedent." Noting that campaign finance law is "ever changing," the paper said the Edwards case came down to one question: "Were the donations for the sole purpose of influencing the campaign or merely one purpose?"

The Justice Department failed miserably at trial. Edwards was acquitted on one count, while the jury deadlocked in Edwards' favor on the others. Prosecutors opted not to try again.

President Trump would point out that the accusation against him differs in at least one key respect from Edwards. Prosecutors accused Edwards of raising donor money to pay off the woman. Trump used his own money, which even the byzantine and restrictive campaign finance laws give candidates a lot of freedom to use in unlimited amounts."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...nce-not-russia

[Unregistered]

Add this to the list.

"Jerry Nadler, the Democrat who will chair the House Judiciary Committee, said the campaign finance charges "would be impeachable offenses because, even though they were committed before the president became president, they were committed in the service of fraudulently obtaining the office." Nadler said he has still not determined whether the charges, even though they could be the basis for impeachment, are important enough to actually go forward, at least yet.

Nadler's public caution is understandable.... One significant problem could be that the campaign finance charge against the president is a pretty iffy case. Back in 2010, the Justice Department accused 2008 presidential candidate John Edwards of a similar scheme — an alleged campaign finance violation based on a payoff to a woman with whom Edwards had had an affair (and a child).

Edwards said he arranged the payment to save his reputation and hide the affair from his wife. The Justice Department said it was to influence the outcome of a presidential election.

The New York Times called the Edwards indictment "a case that had no precedent." Noting that campaign finance law is "ever changing," the paper said the Edwards case came down to one question: "Were the donations for the sole purpose of influencing the campaign or merely one purpose?"

The Justice Department failed miserably at trial. Edwards was acquitted on one count, while the jury deadlocked in Edwards' favor on the others. Prosecutors opted not to try again.

President Trump would point out that the accusation against him differs in at least one key respect from Edwards. Prosecutors accused Edwards of raising donor money to pay off the woman. Trump used his own money, which even the byzantine and restrictive campaign finance laws give candidates a lot of freedom to use in unlimited amounts."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...nce-not-russia

From the above article.

"The political reality is, it doesn't really matter if it is a weak case. And it doesn't matter if Trump himself has not been indicted, or even that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Because now, Democrats can say, "The Justice Department has implicated the president in two felonies. Two felonies. TWO FELONIES!"

Politically, that's as good as an indictment of Trump. Perhaps even better, since it does not give the president a forum to make a proper legal defense."

I've been saying exactly this. And guess what Dems. This is going to PO the 63 million who voted for Trump even more.

[Unregistered]

From the above article.

"The political reality is, it doesn't really matter if it is a weak case. And it doesn't matter if Trump himself has not been indicted, or even that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Because now, Democrats can say, "The Justice Department has implicated the president in two felonies. Two felonies. TWO FELONIES!"

Politically, that's as good as an indictment of Trump. Perhaps even better, since it does not give the president a forum to make a proper legal defense."

I've been saying exactly this. And guess what Dems. This is going to PO the 63 million who voted for Trump even more.

Just imagine 63 million Americans donning yellow vests.

[Unregistered]

I’m looking at the drivel the con has posted while Nancy perolsi and Chuck Schumer make an excellent point:

You have the House , you have the Senate , you have the WH. It’s a Trump shutdown !

PS when Chuck Schumer powns you, not winning ....

[Unregistered]

I’m looking at the drivel the con has posted while Nancy perolsi and Chuck Schumer make an excellent point:

You have the House , you have the Senate , you have the WH. It’s a Trump shutdown !

PS when Chuck Schumer powns you, not winning ....

[Unregistered]

Just imagine 63 million Americans donning yellow vests.

Only terminal cons who hate the US ideate about that ....

As you Cons we’re always so fond of telling us when it suited you, France ain’t the USA ....

😂😂😂😂😂

[Unregistered]

Only terminal cons who hate the US ideate about that ....

As you Cons we’re always so fond of telling us when it suited you, France ain’t the USA ....

😂😂😂😂😂

But angry every day citizens are. And that is exactly who the protesters in France are. Sort of like Tea Partiers gone berserk.

[Unregistered]

I’m looking at the drivel the con has posted while Nancy perolsi and Chuck Schumer make an excellent point:

You have the House , you have the Senate , you have the WH. It’s a Trump shutdown !

PS when Chuck Schumer powns you, not winning ....

Speaking of Nancy, seems she's got her own issues.

More than 130 arrested at Pelosi's Capitol Hill office amid environmental-activist demonstration

"Hundreds of young demonstrators turned out Monday on Capitol Hill to push Democrats on a package of ambitious environmental goals — including a nationwide transition to 100-percent power from renewable sources within as little as 10 years."

[Unregistered]

But angry every day citizens are. And that is exactly who the protesters in France are. Sort of like Tea Partiers gone berserk.

Take a look at Trump supporters. They can barely motivate themselves to get to his rallies, let alone march the streets. Problem is, they have a lot more guns. Most of them in fact. Only 40% of Americans adults own guns but close to 60% of them are Republicans. Think about that - 40% own the 300+M guns in this country.

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/...gun-ownership/

[Unregistered]

If these are students, they should be sent home. Give someone else an opportunity to get an education. Spoiled brats.

I did learn a new phrase from these yahoos . " Climate injustice " . Unbelievable.





NEW HAVEN — Yale University police have arrested 48 people who were protesting the Ivy League school’s investments in fossil fuel companies and its Puerto Rico debt holdings.

The arrests came during a sit-in demonstration Friday inside Yale’s investment office as more than 300 students and community members rallied outside the building.

Protesters demanded Yale divest endowment funds from fossil fuel companies because of concerns about climate change. They also said they wanted Yale to cancel its holdings in a fund that holds some of Puerto Rico’s massive debt and is suing the U.S. territory to be paid while the island still struggles to recover from hurricane damage.


Yale officials say a school committee has previously addressed concerns about fossil fuel investments and Puerto Rican debt, but that they support student freedom of expression.

[Unregistered]

But angry every day citizens are. And that is exactly who the protesters in France are. Sort of like Tea Partiers gone berserk.

I like Macron's approach: Asking companies to pay off the protesters.....

[Unregistered]

But angry every day citizens are. And that is exactly who the protesters in France are. Sort of like Tea Partiers gone berserk.

But “Tea Partiers” don’t go berserk....they are sad, old pathetic whiner’s who parade around in powdered wigs, not yellow jackets

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

But you are dreaming on it ...that’s where you go now that your bast*** is being rejected like a bad transplant by very the fabric of our democracy ....

See how great America is ?

[Unregistered]

Speaking of Nancy, seems she's got her own issues.

More than 130 arrested at Pelosi's Capitol Hill office amid environmental-activist demonstration

"Hundreds of young demonstrators turned out Monday on Capitol Hill to push Democrats on a package of ambitious environmental goals — including a nationwide transition to 100-percent power from renewable sources within as little as 10 years."

Sure ...that’s how it’s done ....tea party demonstrations pushed the GOP where they wanted it and the party was responsive ....

I’m down with the “green New Deal”

The billionaire oligarchs just need to pay the freight ...not the little people ....

[Unregistered]

I like Macron's approach: Asking companies to pay off the protesters.....

One way or another the HAVES are gonna pay , not the HAVE NOTS

[Unregistered]

Shorter Trump to Kelly:

“You’re unfired.”

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

note to cons: going to continue to fe worse