-
-
No man wants their name in the news like this.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Just ask Mike Pressler, the Duke lacrosse team, the men of Phi Kappa Psi fraternity, Brian Banks, and Emmett Till.
Oh ya, you can't ask Emmett Till. He's dead thanks to false accusations of sexual assault by a credible white woman.
Whoop-dee-do!And while the Cons claim the Dems are playing dirty politics let's remind them that 3 Dems voted for the last Trump SCOTUS nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Your assuming that no Democrats will vote for Kavanaugh, that minds have been made up without hearing the testimony of Ford and Kavanaugh. So what's the point of the testimony?Comment
-
No one has confirmed Ramirez accusations. Someone who knows her has said they believe her, but they were never there to corroborate her accusations.Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
That BS, just more Democrat propaganda. It's nearly impossible to get fired from a government job.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
BTW you do know the number of Americans who have security clearances, right? More than 4.3M people.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...nce/102549298/Comment
-
I get that Grassley comes across as a grumpy old man, but Durbin's grandstanding was over the top. Good to see Grassley put him in his place.
Ford does come across as credible. I do fully believe she is confident in her testimony as being accurate as can be.Comment
-
How then do you explain Biden's view on the subject?Originally posted by Unregistered View PostComment
-
"A New York Times article scrutinizing inside jokes in the 1983 yearbook of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s Georgetown Preparatory School hid multiple problems with its claims, including that it was sourced to a rabidly anti-Trump politician in Maryland and his associate.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
The article reveals inside jokes about a friend of Kavanaugh and his classmates named Renate Schroeder Dolphin. The classmates are featured in a picture with a caption “Renate Alumnius,” which the Times’ named and anonymous sources argue is bragging about sex. The classmates strenuously insist that the reference was nothing of the kind and that none of the men had sexual relations with the friend. They say that they attended each other’s dances and prep school functions and maintained the friendship throughout the next several decades.
Another source for the article who condemned the jokes that were printed in the yearbook was himself an editor at the yearbook, although that was not mentioned in the article. He and a source who supposedly “requested anonymity because he fears retribution” said that the the inside jokes were bragging about sexual conquests with the female student. Kavanaugh and several of his classmates denied the charge. Several of the men say sources the Times used weren’t close enough to the group to speak knowledgeably about their jokes.
The last line of the article is “[Dolphin] and a second friend of Ms. Dolphin’s denied that there was any sexual contact between Ms. Dolphin and Judge Kavanaugh or anyone else in his circle.” A similar denial was the first line of a statement to the New York Times from some of the men mentioned in the article, but it was not printed. It began, “None of us has ever taken part in any kind of verbal conduct or physical actions described by the Times and never bragged about or suggested any such thing.”
The Times, which allowed anonymous sources to make the claim of sexual bragging that forms the basis of the story, would not allow anonymous sources to dispute that claim or defend the group of classmates.
“The New York Times’ callous treatment of the yearbook references to our friend have now destroyed relationships that span four decades. These friendships can’t be recovered and will never be replaced. The anguish caused to our friend is immeasurable; the loss of her trust and respect is devastating,” said one member of the group portrayed by the article, who requested anonymity both because he worries about causing further distress and for fear the New York Times will continue to target him."
http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/25/...felzV.facebookComment
-
Now WHY OH WHY would they do that?! NYT quickly scrubs source of yearbook hit piece on KavanaughOriginally posted by Unregistered View Post
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/0...=twitchywidget
"If and when Kavanaugh is cleared and finally confirmed, we must never forget how complicit the media was in smearing his person, his name, and his family. They will pretend they weren’t biased and just covered the story but when you see hit pieces like this yearbook garbage from the New York Times, it’s clear they too have an agenda in doing whatever they can to stop Kavanaugh."Comment
-
Bore-us
Turn on FOX. Smell the panic.
🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿Comment
-
Cons getting quite a comeuppance today.
Panic because 15/55 minutes of questioning used up and “haven’t laid a glove on her yet”
That’s FOX
🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿Comment
-
No woman lies, right TMan?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...2c&oe=5C27024AComment
-
“I don’t think you’ve shaken her credibility as a witness.”
- Britt Hume
Judge napolitano finds her “highly credible”
I think trump will be cooling on Brett soon ....Comment
-
Let’s stay focused on matters at hand for the moment , shall we ?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Tee hee
Bwa ha ha
🍿😊🍿😊😊😊
Proceed g’uvnorComment
Comment