Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post

    basically, I just wanted to say thanks for the laugh. The banter here clearly represents the current climate of our nation.
    This is correct. We have so much anger and mockery and deep-rooted beliefs, I actually fear for this country.

    Comment


      "When yelling loudest doesn't win, we'll just take our ball and go home"

      Dem tag line for 2020???

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        First question to Dr. Ford should have been ;
        " Have you ever been prescribed and taken psychotropic drugs ?
        The smears continue.

        Then certainly you heard about his love of drinking.

        Sounds like he’s still drinking.

        Shouldn’t an evaluation by professional addictionologists be part of the picture

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          "When yelling loudest doesn't win, we'll just take our ball and go home"

          Dem tag line for 2020???
          Doofus

          Lindsey by far yelled the loudest, followed by the crazy old men grassley and hatch

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            The smears continue.

            Then certainly you heard about his love of drinking.

            Sounds like he’s still drinking.

            Shouldn’t an evaluation by professional addictionologists be part of the picture
            She is making the accusation.
            She has the burden of proof.
            If she can't even get it into a Court of Law with her accusation , he doesn't have to defend himself.

            Comment


              Another stunt. Walking out of the meeting.
              They're not done. Not by a longshot.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Several of those women and one who was in a PAC ad have now withdrawn their support. the ABA has now said there needs to be an investigation. He's got anger issues against the Dems and women. He may be a drunk. He's lied multiple times over small things - a true sign of a perpetual liar. There's a long list of other conservative judges out there they can get in before x-mas.
                Most telling is that “American Jesuit” has WITHDRAWN their support.

                This organization celebrated his nomination BECAUSE of the possibility of turning back Roe.

                Tells you how deep their concerns are to withdraw it. Significant .

                Cons happy to DESTROY the SC and senate in one fell swoop.

                Cons you need to cancel the elections in Nov . Jig is up then.

                Comment


                  man oh man Leahy is such a blow hard

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    man oh man Leahy is such a blow hard


                    Leahy said Kavanaugh misled the Senate when being asked about stolen documents. He said he didn't think Kavanaugh was guilty of sexual assault but "it does go to the heart of Judge Kavanaugh's truthfulness."


                    " truthfulness"

                    Is making false accusations without any corroboration and evidence, withholding the letter for 6 weeks , are those steps on a path to " truthfulness " ?

                    Really, calling him a " blow hard" is being kind.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      man oh man Leahy is such a blow hard
                      How about Blumenthal? The guy who lied about his military service saying "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" which is a legal principle that dictates jurors can rule a witness to be false in everything if he says one thing that is not true. The whole state of Connecticut can now ignore anything the guy says.

                      liberal = hypocrites

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        She is making the accusation.
                        She has the burden of proof.
                        If she can't even get it into a Court of Law with her accusation , he doesn't have to defend himself.
                        You do know that MD prosecutors have received a complaint from one of his victims , right .

                        Might be an investigation.

                        I’m sure the investigators will back off when mark judge whines about being a recovering alcoholic

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          How about Blumenthal? The guy who lied about his military service saying "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" which is a legal principle that dictates jurors can rule a witness to be false in everything if he says one thing that is not true. The whole state of Connecticut can now ignore anything the guy says.

                          liberal = hypocrites
                          Attack !!!!

                          Cons want to make it abiut anything BUT the message the nation got yesterday.

                          Plus stories about Justice Rapey forevermore

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            I didn't say that or imply that.
                            All I know is that when I hear someone say this ;

                            I told very few friends that I had this traumatic experience. I told my husband before we were married that I had experienced a sexual assault. I had never told the details to anyone until May 2012, during a couples counseling session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed an extensive remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted to have a second front door, I described the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court and spoke a bit about his background. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.


                            I would like a list of their medication at the same. Also any recreational drugs that she may have used.
                            Good point. If the Dems can go after Kavanaugh on adolescent drinking certainly the Republicans should be able to ask about her drug use.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              She is making the accusation.
                              She has the burden of proof.
                              If she can't even get it into a Court of Law with her accusation , he doesn't have to defend himself.

                              No he acted like a belligerent drunk yesterday . We all saw it.

                              “I like beer. Don’t you like beer.”

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

                                The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

                                “Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom”. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.
                                "The Democrats should be happy that this is not a trial because if it were, she would likely lose. He would be afforded the presumption of innocence and she would have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. She has no corroborating witnesses and she has a jury as does Brett Kavanaugh who has made his mind." - NBC News legal commentator and host Megyn Kelly

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X