Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

lol like Michael Wolfe's book too. He was laughing all the way to the bank

Even the libs are making fun of Wolfe.

It's the Michael Wolff self-destruction tour
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.eabbff46ba08

[Unregistered]

The screenshot isn’t wrong. Here is the link to the page so you can see for yourself. Don’t know why realclear has two different sets of data for NBC/WSJ.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...able-5493.html

[Unregistered]

Comey was confirmed by the Senate 93-1.

And he's a Republican

[Unregistered]

And he's a Republican

And, he's #2/84 on the list of blamees on the award-winning book "How I Managed to Fvck Up This Election"

[Unregistered]

Comey was confirmed by the Senate 93-1.

You shouldn't take that as enthusiasm for the nominee.

Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is the only one with guts to vote against.

Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) voted present.

Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had to file a cloture motion on Comey’s nomination until Republicans agreed to hold the up-or-down vote on his nomination.

Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said he would support Comey’s nomination, but that this was “a serious decision” for the chamber. Grassley said that Congress’s constitutional right to “advise and consent” to executive nominees was not the same as “rubber stamping.”

Comey, the choir boy, is portrayed as against the use of water boarding as an interrogation method, but in 2005, as Deputy Attorney General, Comey endorsed a memorandum approving the use of 13 enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding and sleep deprivation. Comey's actual objections was to a second memorandum that these techniques could be used in combination. He was also known at the time of his confirmation for his opposition to the Bush warrantless wiretapping program which is a real hoot considering what just went down.

[Unregistered]

And he's a Republican

Prove it.

[Unregistered]

The screenshot isn’t wrong. Here is the link to the page so you can see for yourself. Don’t know why realclear has two different sets of data for NBC/WSJ.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...able-5493.html

Then how do you explain this?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...179.html#polls

And this? The actual poll....

In general, do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as president? (IF APPROVE/DISAPPROVE) And, do you strongly or just somewhat (approve/disapprove) of the job Donald Trump is doing as president?

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/TODAY/z_...20Release).pdf

[Unregistered]

Did the con actually tell you cons are plunking down their dollars to read comey’s book?

#winning

I love it when libs count their chickens. As we know libs aren't too good with math.

Turley: Comey May Have Lied To Congress About Not Leaking, McCabe Firing Hurts Case

https://youtu.be/XVQJisIc8mw

JONATHAN TURLEY, LAWYER, LEGAL SCHOLAR, WRITER, AND LEGAL ANALYST: Well, what is justified in the sense that these were career officials at the office on of professional responsibility that made this recommendation which is exceedingly rare. In fact, it is unprecedented for someone in this position. These are not political appointees. The OPR, quite frankly, is not viewed as a particularly aggressive office, so all of that makes this a relatively rare sanction coming from career officers. They clearly concluded that McCabe misled them, and that he misled them on one of the core issues they were investigating, not a collateral issue.


What is going to create an issue going forward is whether there will be a criminal referral. Michael Flynn was indicted for making a false statement to investigators. Now, it is true that they were looking at him for other crimes as well. But there will be some that will argue why would you indict Michael Flynn but an Deputy FBI Director is just worried about his pension, not prison.


It's the alleged false statement. As you know, there is a great deal of background discussion that occurs with reporters from the FBI and the DOJ. It is always the misrepresentation. Keep in mind with Michael Flynn, his meeting with the Russians wasn't in any way illegal or unprecedented. It was failing to tell them about sanctions being discussed at the meeting that led to his charge. But this could easily spin further out of control. There was one line in McCabe's statement last night that I immediately flagged because he said that he had authority to do this and he conferred with the director.


The director at that time was James Comey. Now the problem there is that James Comey said under oath that he never leaked information and never approved a leak. So if the Inspector General believes this was a leak to the media, it raises serious questions about Comey's previous testimony and could get him into serious trouble.


Comey has already been accused, as you know, of leaking information through a friend at Columbia Law School. After he left he removed material from the FBI that the FBI material that the FBI has indicated, I think correctly so, that was FBI material, not subject to being removed from the bureau. Some of that appears to be classified. So Comey, himself, is not out of the woods on this and McCabe's statement doesn't help his position any.

[Unregistered]

Andrew McCabe was fired after an inspection, an investigation of the FBI and its handling of the Hillary Clinton email mess by the Office of Inspector General. The Office of Inspector General, the head of that agency, was appointed by Barack Obama.

And the original reason for the internal investigation of the FBI was because Obama and the Democrats were livid that Comey reopened the investigation late in October before the election. And what happened was, when the investigation got going, the inspector general in fact found something the exact opposite of what the Democrats expected to see. They found that McCabe had lied to investigators.

McCabe was fired after both the inspector general and a review board within the FBI made the recommendation. Trump had nothing to do with it. Jeff Sessions had nothing to do with it, other than carrying it out.

McCabe did not lose his pension. He lost early access to some benefits.

When McCabe went public, he said the director approved everything he was doing. Comey testified under oath that he didn’t leak anything ever and now McCabe is saying he leaked with the approval of the director. So Comey’s big book is coming out this week and McCabe may have inadvertently turned the tables on Comey.

[Unregistered]

Andrew McCabe was fired after an inspection, an investigation of the FBI and its handling of the Hillary Clinton email mess by the Office of Inspector General. The Office of Inspector General, the head of that agency, was appointed by Barack Obama.

And the original reason for the internal investigation of the FBI was because Obama and the Democrats were livid that Comey reopened the investigation late in October before the election. And what happened was, when the investigation got going, the inspector general in fact found something the exact opposite of what the Democrats expected to see. They found that McCabe had lied to investigators.

McCabe was fired after both the inspector general and a review board within the FBI made the recommendation. Trump had nothing to do with it. Jeff Sessions had nothing to do with it, other than carrying it out.

McCabe did not lose his pension. He lost early access to some benefits.

When McCabe went public, he said the director approved everything he was doing. Comey testified under oath that he didn’t leak anything ever and now McCabe is saying he leaked with the approval of the director. So Comey’s big book is coming out this week and McCabe may have inadvertently turned the tables on Comey.

Note the date BEFORE the inaugeration.

DOJ watchdog opens review of Comey's Clinton email investigation
Clinton and aides have blamed FBI's pre-election revelation as a key factor in her narrow loss to Trump.

By JOSH GERSTEIN 01/12/2017

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...igation-233549

[Unregistered]

Andrew McCabe was fired after an inspection, an investigation of the FBI and its handling of the Hillary Clinton email mess by the Office of Inspector General. The Office of Inspector General, the head of that agency, was appointed by Barack Obama.

And the original reason for the internal investigation of the FBI was because Obama and the Democrats were livid that Comey reopened the investigation late in October before the election. And what happened was, when the investigation got going, the inspector general in fact found something the exact opposite of what the Democrats expected to see. They found that McCabe had lied to investigators.

McCabe was fired after both the inspector general and a review board within the FBI made the recommendation. Trump had nothing to do with it. Jeff Sessions had nothing to do with it, other than carrying it out.

McCabe did not lose his pension. He lost early access to some benefits.

When McCabe went public, he said the director approved everything he was doing. Comey testified under oath that he didn’t leak anything ever and now McCabe is saying he leaked with the approval of the director. So Comey’s big book is coming out this week and McCabe may have inadvertently turned the tables on Comey.

No, Andrew McCabe Isn't 'Losing His Pension'
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ebauer/.../#3f430c97236d

Libs lie again!!!

[Unregistered]

Then how do you explain this?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...179.html#polls

And this? The actual poll....

In general, do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as president? (IF APPROVE/DISAPPROVE) And, do you strongly or just somewhat (approve/disapprove) of the job Donald Trump is doing as president?

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/TODAY/z_...20Release).pdf

Did I stutter? I said I don’t know why realclear has two different sets of data for NBC/WSJ. But you want me to explain why they do?

Anyway, it’s enjoyable watching you post poll after poll that shows Trump deep in the red. Lol.

Anyway

[Unregistered]

Steve Banon''s Cambridge Analytica is really in hot water. Hired hookers, paid bribes. Caught on tape. Hidden camera exposes Cambridge Analytica tactics https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/hid...actics-n857936

[Unregistered]

Facebook shares take their biggest one day tumble, off 7%. Zuckerberg has a lot of splannin' to do to Congress

[Unregistered]

Steve Banon''s Cambridge Analytica is really in hot water. Hired hookers, paid bribes. Caught on tape. Hidden camera exposes Cambridge Analytica tactics https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/hid...actics-n857936

It’s withering actually and amazingly all the cons are silent about it.

With their obvious allegiance to Trump OVER country, hope we remember to circle back and ask whether some of them should even vote in our elections down the road.

But first we have some fumigating to do.