Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

“You hire a lawyer – and we hire lawyers all the time who hire third-party vendors to do their work – and so we knew that we were paying for opposition research at the DNC, but we didn’t ask questions about who they’re hiring in the context of doing their research,” Perez told The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty, when asked to explained how he could have been in the dark.

Plausible deniability at it's best. Real transparent stuff going on here....

Puny ball. Here’s some MEAT for ya

It is now commonly agreed, after many months of COSTLY looking, that there was NO collusion between Russia and Trump. Was collusion with HC!

-DJT

Sounds a bit “crazy old man” much like Bore-us. He outed himself last week as same guy posting about Thomas sowell as early as 2010, maybe earlier

He’s wearing the alt-right disruptor
Uniform lately. Used to be a powdered wig. Then there wAs security concern troll during bush years ...

Ride the 🥜 tee go round

[Unregistered]

Lots of somethingburgers here Boris.

Sounds like laundering Russian money gonna be a thing.

A congressional committee investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election has stepped up its probe over the past month, requesting that an agency that combats financial crime turn over confidential banking information on nearly 40 individuals and businesses, including at least nine who are American, BuzzFeed News has learned.

Senator Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network — FinCEN for short — on September 29, seeking information about any suspicious financial transactions banks may have flagged on the individuals and businesses since Jan 2015. Banks are required by law to flag such transactions for FinCEN.

[Unregistered]

“You hire a lawyer – and we hire lawyers all the time who hire third-party vendors to do their work – and so we knew that we were paying for opposition research at the DNC, but we didn’t ask questions about who they’re hiring in the context of doing their research,” Perez told The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty, when asked to explained how he could have been in the dark.

Plausible deniability at it's best. Real transparent stuff going on here....

He must have been a Democrat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmzsWxPLIOo

[Unregistered]

Just one bad news item after another for TeeHeeMan this week And from the New York Times no less.

U.S. Economy Grew at 3% Rate in 3rd Quarter, Despite Storms

Why is this “bad news” for me.

Unlike the Russian lover , I don’t cheer AGAINST Main St. so I can score cheap political points. Economy is one Obama delivered anyway .

[Unregistered]

Lots of somethingburgers here Boris.

Sounds like laundering Russian money gonna be a thing.

Yup, looking for Democrat collusion and there is plenty of evidence of it.

[Unregistered]

Why is this “bad news” for me.

Unlike the Russian lover , I don’t cheer AGAINST Main St. so I can score cheap political points. Economy is one Obama delivered anyway .

Trump 2020!

Japan’s Leader Just Showed How Trump Could Win in 2020

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...n-in-2020.html

THE DEMOCRATS’ 2020 NIGHTMARE

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017...2020-nightmare

Donald Trump is on track to win again in 2020

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/o...007-story.html

Michael Moore Says Trump Is On Track To Win Again In 2020

https://www.fastcompany.com/40459122...-again-in-2020

The incredibly boring reason Trump is on track to win in 2020

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...546/trump-2020

IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID.

[Unregistered]

“You hire a lawyer – and we hire lawyers all the time who hire third-party vendors to do their work – and so we knew that we were paying for opposition research at the DNC, but we didn’t ask questions about who they’re hiring in the context of doing their research,” Perez told The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty, when asked to explained how he could have been in the dark.

Plausible deniability at it's best. Real transparent stuff going on here....

Clinton denies knowing anything about it.

Wasserman Shultz denies knowing anything about it

And they call Trump a liar.

Takes one to know one.

[Unregistered]

Bwahahaha!

And that's what the libs call someone who who grew up in a liberal Jewish family and attended a liberal Ivy league college when they get caught - a right wing shill.

Bwahahaha!

Did Weinstein and Weiner go to ivy league colleges?

[Unregistered]

After much stonewalling the FBI has finally agreed to provide Congress with requested dossier related documents.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...ongress-244207

[Unregistered]

Now that his mommie put Bore-us down for the night we can talk sense here.

The big revelation of the last few days is that the Trump campaign did indeed solicit help (“of value”) from a foreign national for the campaign.

That in of itself is illegal.

Of course 🥜 ters respond to reality by 🥜 ting hence this insane notion that if an entity you don’t like ever pays for opposition research it invalidates it?

Sorry but no so wail on 🥜ters.

The only thing that matters is ....are the allegations true? Looking like yes they are ....trump tower Moscow just as in dossier .....


Tee hee

Bwa ha ha

The treason weasels are going DOWN!

Keep dreaming TMan.

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley: As you know, I've been very skeptical about the past Russian collusion claims as being a criminal matter, even though I supported the appointment of the special counsel after Comey was fired I've been cautioning and many others have that it really isn't a crime to collude. In the same, it wouldn't be a crime on the Trump side to receive information on the other side from a foreign national.

The allegations against the Clintons could potentially be criminal. It doesn't mean that they are criminal. The $500,000 given to Bill Clinton might have been innocent. The timing might just have been horrible. But that would be a cognizable crime if a linkage was found.

In the same way, the allegation over the dossier does involve a potential violation of federal law. The Federal Election Commission Act requires campaigns to state a purpose for any money spent over about $200, to sort of have an item description for each of those amounts. There isn't an item description for this law firm for the amount of money that is being alleged to have been given to this research firm.

[Unregistered]

Now that his mommie put Bore-us down for the night we can talk sense here.

The big revelation of the last few days is that the Trump campaign did indeed solicit help (“of value”) from a foreign national for the campaign.

That in of itself is illegal.

Of course 🥜 ters respond to reality by 🥜 ting hence this insane notion that if an entity you don’t like ever pays for opposition research it invalidates it?

Sorry but no so wail on 🥜ters.

The only thing that matters is ....are the allegations true? Looking like yes they are ....trump tower Moscow just as in dossier .....


Tee hee

Bwa ha ha

The treason weasels are going DOWN!

The definition of treason -

"Here we had the DNC sitting there actually watching a run up to something akin to a cold war with Russia while Hillary Clinton sat and took no responsibility for it.... The severity of this is understanding international affairs were being affected by this. MSNBC and CNN and Clinton and the DNC, it was a run up for a cold war and they knew it was a lie.... They didn't trust any of this dossier they paid for, but instead of saying, "Look we did this" they sat quietly and let it happen."

[Unregistered]

"It seems that their concern about getting foreign countries involved in interfering in the election ... was fine if it was them doing it to Trump [but] not so good if it was potentially, allegedly Trump doing it to them," - Chris Wallace

[Unregistered]

"It amazes me that for a year the Democrats have been whining and whining and whining saying they lost because of the Russians - now it really looks like it was their centrifuge, their ideas, they’re buying this dossier. But also you know there are rumors that the leaks that went to WikiLeaks on all the Clinton emails came from the Democrats as well. So it’s kind of funny, everything they blamed on Republicans it looks like maybe they were the ones responsible for it." - Senator Rand Paul

It's called projecting, Senator. TeeHeeMan does it all the time. It must be an inherit trait of those on the left, part of their DNA.

[Unregistered]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw4Zo2EUsAA-K_F.jpg

[Unregistered]

Very very entertaining watching the Cons with their new chew toy. And boy are they going to chew it and shake it for all it’s worth. But just like Benghazi, Whitewater, etc. it will go nowhere.