Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Failed leaders, failed followers. Let's hope they're good get out of the wayers.

Judging by past experiences, like dumping themselves into a barrel of concrete in the middle of traffic, I'd say "out of the way" isn't necessarily their forte....

[Unregistered]

Judging by past experiences, like dumping themselves into a barrel of concrete in the middle of traffic, I'd say "out of the way" isn't necessarily their forte....

Water cannons!

[Unregistered]

Spot on! The media component is fascinating. They are becoming minimized by Twitter, the internet and the fact that they cannot and should not be trusted. It is no longer journalism but overt bias, and everyone now knows it.

The Democrats are hypocrites pure and simple. Everything they say and do is malleable. They refuse to be held accountable for anything that doesn't go their way. The reaction to the Trump win is exhibit A. Embarassingly juvenile behavior from Obama, Clinton to the entitled morons on college campuses. It is causing the rest of the country to collectively shake their heads and realize how much worse it would have become if HRC actually won.

Bullet dodged.

Absolutely. Stopping briefly at CNN the other day when the latest carnage was on display in Berlin, Trump had tweeted that it was Islamist Terrorists.

The round table of talking heads were shaking their own heads , saying Trump shouldn't say that, how does he know, this is dangerous , on and on. They expressed over and over that this may be a glimpse of what is to come with his Administration .and it could be dangerous, very dangerous. More handwringing and projecting. Then one of them says " How do we know that he knows something we do not ? " What followed was one of the very worse things that can happen in a live broadcast. Dead silence. They were all waiting for their marching orders in their ear piece to continue the conversation.

This is the media of today. Very little thought, very little conceptual concepts, just an agenda , pure and simple. Reactionary to the 10th Degree, to keep the ratings up.

[Unregistered]

Absolutely. Stopping briefly at CNN the other day when the latest carnage was on display in Berlin, Trump had tweeted that it was Islamist Terrorists.

The round table of talking heads were shaking their own heads , saying Trump shouldn't say that, how does he know, this is dangerous , on and on. They expressed over and over that this may be a glimpse of what is to come with his Administration .and it could be dangerous, very dangerous. More handwringing and projecting. Then one of them says " How do we know that he knows something we do not ? " What followed was one of the very worse things that can happen in a live broadcast. Dead silence. They were all waiting for their marching orders in their ear piece to continue the conversation.

This is the media of today. Very little thought, very little conceptual concepts, just an agenda , pure and simple. Reactionary to the 10th Degree, to keep the ratings up.

Classic. There is an old saying in in the medical world...."when you hear hoofbeats think horses not zebras" in other words look to the obvious. The left refuses to accept what has become obvious because it does not fit with their world view. Facts be damned. It doesn't "feel" good, so it can be so.

Assuming that a terrorist is Islamic is the equivalent of assuming an NBA player is taller than the average person. It isn't always the case but the odds are pretty good.

[Unregistered]

+1 to the above commentary.

[Unregistered]

What horrendous acts are being perpetrated? Do tell.

And to clarify, do you oppose verbally harassing the Trump family or not. Yes or No question. Very simple.

P.S. Trump doesn't take office for another 4 weeks. At least wait until then to blame him for everything that ails you. For now, the complaint should be lodged with the current administration.

Do you oppose backing by the KKK's david duke? do you oppose neo-nazi groups heil to Trump? do you oppose punching people demonstrators in the face ? do you oppose torture? Do you oppose blatant lies and conspiracy theories? Do you oppose instructing Russia to hack the DNC? Do you oppose locking opponents up? Do you oppose mislabeling all members of a country as rapists? ... Where ever shall we meet?

[Unregistered]

Do you oppose backing by the KKK's david duke? do you oppose neo-nazi groups heil to Trump? do you oppose punching people demonstrators in the face ? do you oppose torture? Do you oppose blatant lies and conspiracy theories? Do you oppose instructing Russia to hack the DNC? Do you oppose locking opponents up? Do you oppose mislabeling all members of a country as rapists? ... Where ever shall we meet?

1. No. Why would I oppose what some nut chooses to support.
2. No. Same as above.
3. Yes, unless they carry their demonstrating too far. (harassing daughter and grand kids)
4. Yes, but there are exceptions
5. Yes
6. Yes, never happened
7. Depends on what the opponent is guilty of?
8. Yes

[Unregistered]

Do you oppose backing by the KKK's david duke? do you oppose neo-nazi groups heil to Trump? do you oppose punching people demonstrators in the face ? do you oppose torture? Do you oppose blatant lies and conspiracy theories? Do you oppose instructing Russia to hack the DNC? Do you oppose locking opponents up? Do you oppose mislabeling all members of a country as rapists? ... Where ever shall we meet?

Just because you rant doesn't make it so. Calm down snowflake it is gonna be ok.

[Unregistered]

Classic. There is an old saying in in the medical world...."when you hear hoofbeats think horses not zebras" in other words look to the obvious. The left refuses to accept what has become obvious because it does not fit with their world view. Facts be damned. It doesn't "feel" good, so it can be so.

Assuming that a terrorist is Islamic is the equivalent of assuming an NBA player is taller than the average person. It isn't always the case but the odds are pretty good.

Name any current war or escalated conflict in the world today that is does not involve fanatical Islam.

[Unregistered]

Absolutely. Stopping briefly at CNN the other day when the latest carnage was on display in Berlin, Trump had tweeted that it was Islamist Terrorists.

The round table of talking heads were shaking their own heads , saying Trump shouldn't say that, how does he know, this is dangerous , on and on. They expressed over and over that this may be a glimpse of what is to come with his Administration .and it could be dangerous, very dangerous. More handwringing and projecting. Then one of them says " How do we know that he knows something we do not ? " What followed was one of the very worse things that can happen in a live broadcast. Dead silence. They were all waiting for their marching orders in their ear piece to continue the conversation.

This is the media of today. Very little thought, very little conceptual concepts, just an agenda , pure and simple. Reactionary to the 10th Degree, to keep the ratings up.

CNN has put Jeff Zucker in charge. Look what he did to MSNBC. The same fate awaits CNN.

[Unregistered]

I will answer your questions, but I will expect you to do the same to mine.

Do you oppose backing by the KKK's david duke?

I do not back the KKK, but I support Duke's right to support whatever candidate he wishes. Do you back Farrakhan's endorsement of Obama?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2...day-convention

do you oppose neo-nazi groups heil to Trump?

No, I do not. Do you support the New Black Panthers endorsing Obama and certain members of that party being given access to the private residence at the White House? http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-mr-president/

[Unregistered]

do you oppose punching people demonstrators in the face ?

Yes I do.. Do you?

http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/as...-large-169.jpg

And what is your opinion of Democrats within the DNC inciting violence at Trump rallies? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ng-they-hire-/

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/le...rump-protests/

[Unregistered]

do you oppose torture?

Yes I do, but I acknowledge that there maybe times that things like waterboarding may be necessary.

Do you oppose blatant lies and conspiracy theories?

Are we speaking of a "vast right wing conspiracy" and videos being the cause of the death of four Americans in Benghazi or something else?

Do you oppose instructing Russia to hack the DNC?

Are we speaking of conspiracies again? If you are addressings Trump's sarcastic remark about finding Clinton's missing emails, well then it was exactly that - a sarcastic remark. If you are addressing the supposed hacking of the DNC as told by an anonymous CIA source leaking information from a "secret" CIA report, the same CIA whose director endorsed Clinton and has a history for providing misinformation, well let's just say at this point, it's unverifable that there is any connection to Trump. There is however evidence that the emails that Wikileaks obtained were leaked documents by a disgruntle Democrat not hack documents by the Russians.

[Unregistered]

Do you oppose locking opponents up?

That would depend on whether they did anything unlawful. For example should someone who deletes emails after they received a subpoena for those emails be charged with obstruction? And what about employees of government agencies who specifically target and harass citizens and their civic groups who might have oppose the current sitting administration? Should they be held responsible or should they just be allowed to retire and collect their government pensions?

[Unregistered]

Yes I do, but I acknowledge that there maybe times that things like waterboarding may be necessary.



Are we speaking of a "vast right wing conspiracy" and videos being the cause of the death of four Americans in Benghazi or something else?



Are we speaking of conspiracies again? If you are addressings Trump's sarcastic remark about finding Clinton's missing emails, well then it was exactly that - a sarcastic remark. If you are addressing the supposed hacking of the DNC as told by an anonymous CIA source leaking information from a "secret" CIA report, the same CIA whose director endorsed Clinton and has a history for providing misinformation, well let's just say at this point, it's unverifable that there is any connection to Trump. There is however evidence that the emails that Wikileaks obtained were leaked documents by a disgruntle Democrat not hack documents by the Russians.

New poster here.

Sarcastic? Maybe at times but I do recall a clear invitation to the Russians to hack his opponent. Can't spin it any other way.

Right wing spending a LOT of time back pedaling on this . Almost like they are afraid of looking treasonous if they don't carefully back off.