Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Senior Citizens benefitted the most from this change, I guess the GREATEST GENERATION gets your adulation until they need some help feeding themselves. The asset consideration hurt them due to the increases in real estate value. I suppose the best thing would be for them to sell the house and move someplace that is more convenient for you MR. PAY-IT-FORWARD.....

I gave an example of redistribution as asked.

Regarding your nonsense, they are all lies.
Source USDA 2013

23.6 % of SNAP recipients are on Social Security
21.5 % NO earned income from employment

Almost as many non-workers than Social Security recipients.

Percentage of able bodies recipients receiving benefits in 2007- 6.6%
in 2011- 10.2 %

Recently States have been reducing the numbers , so there has been a slight decrease. Without a doubt the program serves a great many number of Americans that need assistance. The issues are weeding out those that don't belong . In addition the percentage of soft drinks and sugar laden products is a Health issue concerns.

Regarding your real estate angle, I suggest you make a call to Bill Clinton who was instrumental in the reasons for the collapse.

[Unregistered]

Senior Citizens benefitted the most from this change, I guess the GREATEST GENERATION gets your adulation until they need some help feeding themselves. The asset consideration hurt them due to the increases in real estate value. I suppose the best thing would be for them to sell the house and move someplace that is more convenient for you MR. PAY-IT-FORWARD.....

The cons want granny eating cat food. That has been their trip for a couple decades now. They obfuscate the reality of their positions with words like "consideration of assets". And don't make it clear what that means is not counting granny's house against her if she needs help to eat.

IMHO the animals among us are those who would either deny those in needs their daily bread or make them line up for it shamefully.

Do you hear that cons? You are the INHUMAN animals if this is how you feel. Keep it up. I'm. It there yet but more of this and I won't care how many of you are beaten in the streets for your anti-life beliefs.

[Unregistered]

The cons want granny eating cat food. That has been their trip for a couple decades now. They obfuscate the reality of their positions with words like "consideration of assets". And don't make it clear what that means is not counting granny's house against her if she needs help to eat.

IMHO the animals among us are those who would either deny those in needs their daily bread or make them line up for it shamefully.

Do you hear that cons? You are the INHUMAN animals if this is how you feel. Keep it up. I'm. It there yet but more of this and I won't care how many of you are beaten in the streets for your anti-life beliefs.

Everyone is a victim......HELP ME! HELP ME!

More people are not choosing to work than any other time in our history.

P.S. Granny should sell the house and move to assisted living if she can't afford it. Her lack of planning is unfortunate for her but hardly my fault. Why should we pay for her food when she has an valuable asset that she is sitting on? Take a reverse mortgage, go get some food and stop whining.

[Unregistered]

The cons want granny eating cat food. That has been their trip for a couple decades now. They obfuscate the reality of their positions with words like "consideration of assets". And don't make it clear what that means is not counting granny's house against her if she needs help to eat.

IMHO the animals among us are those who would either deny those in needs their daily bread or make them line up for it shamefully.

Do you hear that cons? You are the INHUMAN animals if this is how you feel. Keep it up. I'm. It there yet but more of this and I won't care how many of you are beaten in the streets for your anti-life beliefs.

Just get off the Red Eye from San Jose ?

[Unregistered]

The cons want granny eating cat food. That has been their trip for a couple decades now. They obfuscate the reality of their positions with words like "consideration of assets". And don't make it clear what that means is not counting granny's house against her if she needs help to eat.

IMHO the animals among us are those who would either deny those in needs their daily bread or make them line up for it shamefully.

Do you hear that cons? You are the INHUMAN animals if this is how you feel. Keep it up. I'm. It there yet but more of this and I won't care how many of you are beaten in the streets for your anti-life beliefs.

Good post. I don't agree with the actions the protestors are taking at Trump rallys but I understand their anger and motivation. What you are seeing is the tip of the ice berg if Trump becomes President. And that ice berg is going to be damn big if he actually deploys a deportation force. I fear that the unrest could be catastrophic in major cities. This country simply will not tolerate fascism in any shape or form.

[Unregistered]

Everyone is a victim......HELP ME! HELP ME!

More people are not choosing to work than any other time in our history.

P.S. Granny should sell the house and move to assisted living if she can't afford it. Her lack of planning is unfortunate for her but hardly my fault. Why should we pay for her food when she has an valuable asset that she is sitting on? Take a reverse mortgage, go get some food and stop whining.

Question is, would the poster beat a Granny down in the street if she was a Conservative ?

[Unregistered]

Good post. I don't agree with the actions the protestors are taking at Trump rallys but I understand their anger and motivation. What you are seeing is the tip of the ice berg if Trump becomes President. And that ice berg is going to be damn big if he actually deploys a deportation force. I fear that the unrest could be catastrophic in major cities. This country simply will not tolerate fascism in any shape or form.

But we should tolerate civil disobedience with violence, property damage , and physical attacks on Police and citizens ? All for what a person has to say ?

You can understand their anger ?

[Unregistered]

I gave an example of redistribution as asked.

Regarding your nonsense, they are all lies.
Source USDA 2013

23.6 % of SNAP recipients are on Social Security
21.5 % NO earned income from employment

So in other words 4 out of 5 SNAP recipients are working poor or on SS. Your jihad against the program is now revealed as gutless. We would be lucky if 4/5 military dollars were spent in something as valuable.

Almost as many non-workers than Social Security recipients.

Percentage of able bodies recipients receiving benefits in 2007- 6.6%
in 2011- 10.2 %

So in other words only 1/20 recipients were able bodies PRIOR to the recession and that rose to 1/10 a few years AFTER bush's recession started. My god man. most massive fraud ever! Lol

Recently States have been reducing the numbers , so there has been a slight decrease. Without a doubt the program serves a great many number of Americans that need assistance.

States haven't been reducing the numbers. The improving economy has. But as a matter of orthodoxy you cannot acknowledge that so I guess it must be those smaht red states that did this. Yeah right.

The issues are weeding out those that don't belong . In addition the percentage of soft drinks and sugar laden products is a Health issue concerns.

Regarding your real estate angle, I suggest you make a call to Bill Clinton who was instrumental in the reasons for the collapse.

I'd rather call trump. He's on record poised like a vulture to take advantage of the misfortunes of others. Presidential material for sure.

Got anything else for me loser cons?

All you have convinced us of is that you are haters who really don't want to see people you don't like have food to eat on the public dime. Let's be honest that is what this is about, you are willing to see the less fortunate die in the streets and we offer a helping hand. That's what this is about.....a basically dark and competitive view of society vs a collaborative great society. I make no apologies for embracing the essence of my position. You should stop running around and disavowing the HATE that motivates yours.

[Unregistered]

Yes, motivated by hate

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/protest-...se-california/

Hugs & Kisses

-Sock Puppet

[Unregistered]

But we should tolerate civil disobedience with violence, property damage , and physical attacks on Police and citizens ? All for what a person has to say ?

You can understand their anger ?

I have not seen that the people responsible for pushing the civil disobedience into violence have been identified so I don't know their affiliations and motivations.

I will say this. The few becoming violent MUST be seen by the cons the same way they see the few people who do bad things with guns. The vast majority of the protestors, just like gun owners, are peaceful responsible people who are merely exercising their constitutional rights. I am sure that when boundaries are overstepped it happens because of mental illness.

Yeah that's it.

Contemplate that cons.

[Unregistered]

Question is, would the poster beat a Granny down in the street if she was a Conservative ?

Actually more people are working than at any other time in history.

[Unregistered]

But we should tolerate civil disobedience with violence, property damage , and physical attacks on Police and citizens ? All for what a person has to say ?

You can understand their anger ?

So you are saying the residents of the Warsaw ghetto were wrong. Admittedly that is not a poor analogy but when the government fails to represent the opinion of the majority of the population then what you have is tyranny. So for a better analogy were the Patriots in the 1770's wrong? How about you nutters that wave the Confederate flag as a symbol of your anger against the oppression of the federal government against states rights. Or how about the violence and harassment of women accessing reproductive clinics.

Clearly you believe that only people who protest that you agree with have the right?

[Unregistered]

So in other words 4 out of 5 SNAP recipients are working poor or on SS. Your jihad against the program is now revealed as gutless. We would be lucky if 4/5 military dollars were spent in something as valuable.

Stick to the subject. The contention of the poster was that "Senior citizens benefitted the most ". Since they are less than 1/4 of the recipients , and working people are more than a third, the post was a lie.

So in other words only 1/20 recipients were able bodies PRIOR to the recession and that rose to 1/10 a few years AFTER bush's recession started. My god man. most massive fraud ever! Lol

More able bodied people were added under Obama. Not less. More.

States haven't been reducing the numbers. The improving economy has. But as a matter of orthodoxy you cannot acknowledge that so I guess it must be those smaht red states that did this. Yeah right.

States have been reducing the numbers, as it is on them to administer the program.

The issues are weeding out those that don't belong . In addition the percentage of soft drinks and sugar laden products is a Health issue concerns.



I'd rather call trump. He's on record poised like a vulture to take advantage of the misfortunes of others. Presidential material for sure.

Got anything else for me loser cons?

All you have convinced us of is that you are haters who really don't want to see people you don't like have food to eat on the public dime. Let's be honest that is what this is about, you are willing to see the less fortunate die in the streets and we offer a helping hand. That's what this is about.....a basically dark and competitive view of society vs a collaborative great society. I make no apologies for embracing the essence of my position. You should stop running around and disavowing the HATE that motivates yours.

Simply pointing out relevant facts isn't hate. The trend by Progressives, specifically in some Institutions of Higher Education, is to not even entertain opposite ideas to Progressive policies. No one is " dying in the streets " from hunger. In Chicago, they are dying in the streets by their own hand. America has the highest levels of obesity in history, and that includes SNAP recipients. But I suppose you think providing Coca Cola and other sugar laden drinks and food to children on the taxpayers dime is a worthy and noble gesture.

[Unregistered]

Actually more people are working than at any other time in history.

..as the American population has grown in numbers.

[Unregistered]

So in other words 4 out of 5 SNAP recipients are working poor or on SS. Your jihad against the program is now revealed as gutless. We would be lucky if 4/5 military dollars were spent in something as valuable.



So in other words only 1/20 recipients were able bodies PRIOR to the recession and that rose to 1/10 a few years AFTER bush's recession started. My god man. most massive fraud ever! Lol



States haven't been reducing the numbers. The improving economy has. But as a matter of orthodoxy you cannot acknowledge that so I guess it must be those smaht red states that did this. Yeah right.

The issues are weeding out those that don't belong . In addition the percentage of soft drinks and sugar laden products is a Health issue concerns.



I'd rather call trump. He's on record poised like a vulture to take advantage of the misfortunes of others. Presidential material for sure.

Got anything else for me loser cons?

All you have convinced us of is that you are haters who really don't want to see people you don't like have food to eat on the public dime. Let's be honest that is what this is about, you are willing to see the less fortunate die in the streets and we offer a helping hand. That's what this is about.....a basically dark and competitive view of society vs a collaborative great society. I make no apologies for embracing the essence of my position. You should stop running around and disavowing the HATE that motivates yours.

When I hear the words make America great again I wonder what Trump and his supporters mean. But I fear that it means return America to the control of racist, rich, white men.... kind of like America in the 1950's. Such a civil society on the surface but so much debauchery, greed, drunkenness, and other sins behind close doors.