Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Wrong. Obama's job approval is only at 46%. On foreign policy it's only 38% and as far as Obamacare is concerned that is only at 38%. Try to move outside your confirmation bubble to the real world.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...plan-1130.html

Polls polls polls

Now sanders and Clinton beat trump.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltra...-super-tuesday


Polls polls polls

Ex lax....you want to.....what was the word they used in 2012 when polls got "normalized" what was the word.

Bad news in these poll trends for the trump gang. Sanders double digits over trump....Clinton wins now whereas she lost in last poll. If the last month's move,ent is indicative of a trend....ruh Roh

Interesting to see these poll numbers 1-2 days after GOP panic over trump.

Hope Donald crushed today ...want this election in November

[Unregistered]

Polls polls polls

Now sanders and Clinton beat trump.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltra...-super-tuesday


Polls polls polls

Ex lax....you want to.....what was the word they used in 2012 when polls got "normalized" what was the word.

Bad news in these poll trends for the trump gang. Sanders double digits over trump....Clinton wins now whereas she lost in last poll. If the last month's move,ent is indicative of a trend....ruh Roh

Interesting to see these poll numbers 1-2 days after GOP panic over trump.

Hope Donald crushed today ...want this election in November

I don't see where you answered his question, again. You said 54% of the country loves Obama. Two sources disputed that, so you moved on with another unreadable diatribe.

[Unregistered]

But wouldn't the fact the school takes tax dollars be the deciding factor that they can't discriminate? Or does that only cut one way?

A small group of riotous students should decide? When you watch these events on tape plenty of students attend the speeches and many are DENIED entrance by the thug students.

Correct. They use their "rights" when it is advantageous and then routinely break the law in "protest". Ironic that their ability to protest is protected but the rights of others are infringed. I think the tide is shifting though. Chris Rock alluded to it at the Oscars, the firing of Melissa Harris Perry was another telltale sign. Enough with the false outrage. When everything is protested, it dilutes the outrage.

[Unregistered]

I don't see where you answered his question, again. You said 54% of the country loves Obama. Two sources disputed that, so you moved on with another unreadable diatribe.

Facts from a liberal are meaningless. Trying to reason with a liberal is even more futile. Talk about how Obama makes you "feel" and you might get an audience. Pay no mind to the fact that he has been a disaster. Foreign policy nightmare, economy nightmare and even his "landmark" healthcare legislation is taking on water faster than they can bail it. A mess on all accounts. I have cited reasons for this "opinion" but again, futile to try and have a reasonable discussion with a liberal.

Obama makes them feel good. And despite all of the facts to the contrary, that feeling is what drives liberals.

[Unregistered]

But wouldn't the fact the school takes tax dollars be the deciding factor that they can't discriminate? Or does that only cut one way?

Different poster. No different than a county accepting federal highway money and still having local control? I thought cons were all about local control?

A small group of riotous students should decide? When you watch these events on tape plenty of students attend the speeches and many are DENIED entrance by the thug students.

Lost in all this is the fact the speech went on. Group of students protested, cons tuck ball, run, and imply free speech was stopped. It wasn't. On other hand, when trump removed black students from his event when they weren't protesting, from an event on their campus, THAT is squelching free speech.

When a press photographer is hurled to ground for snapping pictures of "black lives matter" protestors as they are thrown out of another trump event, that's denying free speech.

Can't make this stuff up.

Tee hee

Winning

Love the poll showing Bernie up 12 over trump. Nationally. Un skew that.

[Unregistered]

I don't see where you answered his question, again. You said 54% of the country loves Obama. Two sources disputed that, so you moved on with another unreadable diatribe.

I wasn't answering anyone's questions.mthat was my first post today. Can't you cons keep ANYTHING straight?

-the perfesser

[Unregistered]

Tampax - you truly are an idiot and make this string hard to read.

Our research on disinvitations over the past 15 years identifies five trends:
1.The number of “disinvitation incidents”—i.e., efforts to prevent invited speakers from conveying their message on campus—has risen dramatically.
2.The number of “successful” disinvitations where a speaker ultimately does not speak as a result of a concerted effort to prevent them from doing so has increased as well.
3.Speakers are much more likely to be targeted for disinvitation for holding or expressing viewpoints perceived as conservative by faculty or students.
4.Disinvitation incidents occur with nearly equal frequency among public, private, and sectarian schools, demonstrating that disinvitations are not isolated to any particular type of university.
5.Institutions that have seen the highest number of disinvitation incidents also maintain severely speech-restrictive policies.

This report demonstrates that disinvitation on campus is a two-fold problem: Students and faculty are demanding the exclusion of opinions with which they disagree, and campus administrators and invited speakers are increasingly willing to give in to these demands

Not only are unsuccessful disinvitation attempts increasing, but so too are successful disinvitations, which fall into three categories:
1.Formal disinvitation from the speaking engagement, such as Brandeis University’s recent decision to rescind its invitation to Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
2.Withdrawal by the speaker in the face of protest, as recently demonstrated by Condoleezza Rice at Rutgers University.
3.“Heckler’s vetoes,” in which students or faculty persistently disrupt or entirely prevent the speakers’ ability to speak, illustrated by the case of Ray Kelly at Brown University.

While disinvitations on campus are a year-round phenomenon, controversies surrounding commencement speakers are clustered around the same calendar weeks and generally feature the highest-profile speakers. Accordingly, these incidents typically garner the most publicity. For these reasons, we refer to the time period near graduation as “disinvitation season.”

Political Classifications:

Speakers are more likely to be targeted for disinvitation for holding or expressing viewpoints perceived as conservative by faculty or students. However, disinvitations on campus are usually a response to the perceived nature of a specific political stance rather than a speaker’s complete political ideology, meaning that many of the disinvitation efforts based on a speaker’s perceived “conservative” viewpoints are undertaken against speakers who might self-identify as liberal. A more useful way to classify disinvitation attempts on the basis of politics, therefore, is as coming “from the left of the speaker” or “from the right of the speaker,” rather than an assessment based on the speaker’s more general political orientation.

For example, students at University of California, Hastings College of the Law urged the administration to disinvite former United States Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, a Democrat, because of her support for policies that allegedly led to the increased deportation of undocumented immigrants. Therefore, although Ms. Napolitano does not self-identify as conservative, FIRE has classified her disinvitation attempt as coming “from the left of the speaker.”

[Unregistered]

Don't have time to read a book over an issue that is Pedantic when you cribbed the whole thing elsewhere.....next time, just use a link unless what you spew to,screen represents YOUR original thinking, which be definition amounts to white space for a con.

[Unregistered]

Besides ex lax I don't let you define the terms of debate here.....I taught you that years ago. You don't let the kids drive the bus.

[Unregistered]

Besides ex lax I don't let you define the terms of debate here.....I taught you that years ago. You don't let the kids drive the bus.

Why don't you two just exchange email or phone numbers and talk to each other all day. Saves you time from checking the website.

[Unregistered]

Why don't you two just exchange email or phone numbers and talk to each other all day. Saves you time from checking the website.

Offered ex lax is afraid to come out from under his bed.

[Unregistered]

But wouldn't the fact the school takes tax dollars be the deciding factor that they can't discriminate? Or does that only cut one way?

A small group of riotous students should decide? When you watch these events on tape plenty of students attend the speeches and many are DENIED entrance by the thug students.

That doesn't matter to liberals. They are collectivists and if you are not of the same collectivists mindset you must be stamped out. This is but the beginning of what people like Cujo and company want.

[Unregistered]

"Standardization of our educational systems is apt to stamp out individualism and defeat the very ends of education by leveling the product down rather than up." - Harvey Cushing

[Unregistered]

http://thefederalistpapers.integrate...2225403584.jpg

[Unregistered]

Don't have time to read a book over an issue that is Pedantic when you cribbed the whole thing elsewhere.....next time, just use a link unless what you spew to,screen represents YOUR original thinking, which be definition amounts to white space for a con.

GOD!!! Would you quit drinking so early in the morning??? No one can understand your posts.