Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

The ever pompous tampax - vomit

Bwahahahaha

"(Democrats have) become the playground of white, upper-middle-class professionals with elite-school degrees and me-first values. These liberal poseurs mouth racial and ethnic platitudes, acquired like trophy kills at their p.c. campuses, but every word rings hollow, because it is based on condescension, a patronizing projection of victimhood onto those outside their privileged circle."

Or in other words, Giggles can't help himself.

[Unregistered]

Here and now. Crime rates have moved drastically. I k ow you cons want to live in last but making a today argument based on irrelevant t 30 year old data that is ANECDOTAL at that?

Do you ever "get it"?

Tell that to your friend Cujo, Giggles.

God you progressives are such hypocrites!

[Unregistered]

More lies.

"Three black female college students who claimed to be victims of an assault by a group of white men and women have been charged themselves.

The University at Albany announced Thursday that two of the women, Ariel Agudio and Asha Burwell, have been charged with misdemeanor assault and falsely reporting an incident. The third woman, Alexis Briggs, has been charged with misdemeanor assault.

The women, all 20 years old, claimed they were attacked early on the morning of Jan. 30 while riding a bus. They claimed that they were called racial slurs and were physically attacked while bystanders looked on."


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/26...k-charged.html

[Unregistered]

I lived in Brighton some 30+ years ago. Plenty of crime there.

Most of it white trash punks.

[Unregistered]

Bwahahahaha

"(Democrats have) become the playground of white, upper-middle-class professionals with elite-school degrees and me-first values. These liberal poseurs mouth racial and ethnic platitudes, acquired like trophy kills at their p.c. campuses, but every word rings hollow, because it is based on condescension, a patronizing projection of victimhood onto those outside their privileged circle."

Or in other words, Giggles can't help himself.

I think this article about sums it for me. I am sure tampax and cujo will rip Peggy Noonan and say she is a guy in drag or some whacked out comment because she is a woman off the progressive plantation.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-an...ted-1456448550

[Unregistered]

I think this article about sums it for me. I am sure tampax and cujo will rip Peggy Noonan and say she is a guy in drag or some whacked out comment because she is a woman off the progressive plantation.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-an...ted-1456448550

citing people so old and/or drunk they are having senior moments in front of cameras?

Being interviewed by Jake tapper....

NOONAN: Oh, I think you can't legislate away some of life's limits and joys. It's a very rich and varied thing. Look, I think that -- interesting article in the Atlantic tends -- it seems to me it is focusing on how women are doing in the world, in business, in the professions. What percentage of people we have -- of women we have in the State Department and are we slipping and such?

And I think, therefore, it takes a slightly limited view of what women are, what choices they have, and what they might want to be. And so it's seemed to me a little bit limited and crabbed in its canvas, I suppose.

I forget where I'm going with that, beyond it is good to remember that it is good to work with children, it is good to be in the house, it's good to be in the office. All of these things are good. You've got to be open about them, but you can't try to legislate it too closely.

Regans's former press secretary and look at sentences she starts with prepositions. Why you'd be on a jihad if a lib wrote like this.

Then the bolded part.....that's her saying she forgot what she was talking about, right ex lax?

Can't make it up.....

Tee hee

Bwah haha

Word salad. What's nooner so now, about 95?

Btw can't read what she said but I already know

[Unregistered]

OMG noonan is only 66!

Let that be a lesson. Stay off the bottle.

Tee hee

[Unregistered]

Most of it white trash punks.

Ya, that went to BC.

[Unregistered]

I think tis article about sums it for me. I am sure tampax and cujo will rip Peggy Noonan and say she is a guy in drag or some whacked out comment because she is a woman off the progressive plantation.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-an...ted-1456448550

I saw that article. It was excellent. Seems to go hand in hand with this one.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...my_129766.html

[Unregistered]

citing people so old and/or drunk they are having senior moments in front of cameras?

Being interviewed by Jake tapper....



Regans's former press secretary and look at sentences she starts with prepositions. Why you'd be on a jihad if a lib wrote like this.

Then the bolded part.....that's her saying she forgot what she was talking about, right ex lax?

Can't make it up.....

Tee hee

Bwah haha

Word salad. What's nooner so now, about 95?

Btw can't read what she said but I already know

Giggles, what a joke you are. So who are you voting for? The youthful Hillary Clinton (age 68) rumored to have a bit of a drinking problem herself, or the youthful Bernie Sanders (age 74) whose had a few too many mushrooms over the years?

But I do have to say, Giggles, that I am so very pleased that you continue to prove how small minded and hypocritical people like you are. Your continuance to prove yourself incapable of engaging in any form of reasonable debate is very much appreciated. Your ability obviously goes no further than attempting to discredit the messenger since you are impotent to address the message . You have underscored the points made by Camille Paglia about liberal poseurs. Thanks again.

[Unregistered]

This is for Cujo.

Why Democrats Should Beware Sanders’ Socialism

He’s a socialist, not a liberal—and there’s a big difference.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...#ixzz41P1bOwEW

Just what is Sanders’ socialism? As analogs to his own program, Sanders points to the policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and the social democracies of northern Europe. As a liberal, I find a lot to like about both of those. But Sanders’ portrayal of democratic socialism as nothing but the New Deal is a disingenuous sleight of hand that plays on foggy historical memories. And his comparison to Nordic social democracy is equally misleading: Much of Sanders’s platform ignores the economic realities that European socialists long ago accepted.

Many people may be inclined to interpret Sanders’ calls for a revolution as just a rhetorical flourish. I think we should take it seriously. His policies are rooted in a socialist framework rather than a liberal one. And despite what Republicans may say, there’s a big difference between socialism and liberalism. Democrats and independents attracted to Sanders ought to think twice before shrugging off his self-description as a socialist.

Socialism has a history, and Sanders himself has a history as a socialist. Both of those are relevant to understanding Sanders’ proposals and where he wants America to go.The term “socialism” first came into use in the 1830s in France and Britain, just around the time the word “individualism” was being popularized. Socialism primarily referred to socializing private property, putting it either in communal ownership (as in the experimental communities of that era) or in the hands of the state. After the experimental communities faded or failed, socialists focused on state ownership of the means of production and state planning of the economy.

The policies distinctively associated with socialism—nationalization of industry and economic planning—had disappointing results where they were adopted. They were notably unsuccessful in adjusting to economic change and generating high rates of innovation. The political pressures that governments face restrict their ability to make tough but necessary economic decisions—to shrink industries in decline and reallocate capital to areas of growth.

During the mid-20th century, the United States was fortunate to avoid the program that socialists were calling for at that time. While Roosevelt experimented with different strategies in the New Deal, he did not undertake any large-scale nationalization, and the primary legacies he left behind were Social Security and regulatory agencies that not only maintained capitalism but also saved it from self-destructive excesses. Far from embracing socialism, Roosevelt rejected it and ran against socialist opponents, who had no doubt that socialism and the New Deal were very different.

[Unregistered]

This is for the tech worker worried about being displaced by an H1-b worker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoGPtApzjv4

[Unregistered]

Giggles, what a joke you are. So who are you voting for? The youthful Hillary Clinton (age 68) rumored to have a bit of a drinking problem herself, or the youthful Bernie Sanders (age 74) whose had a few too many mushrooms over the years?

But I do have to say, Giggles, that I am so very pleased that you continue to prove how small minded and hypocritical people like you are. Your continuance to prove yourself incapable of engaging in any form of reasonable debate is very much appreciated. Your ability obviously goes no further than attempting to discredit the messenger since you are impotent to address the message . You have underscored the points made by Camille Paglia about liberal poseurs. Thanks again.

Oh no ex lax thank you! All those years of conservative values, free market economics, pro-corporate were, as I said all along just a cover up for your ugly racist heart.

All it took was the emergence of your bro, Trump, for you to toss away the mask and step right to the front of the "hate the other" bandwagon.

You've been posting all day as usual while the rest of us live the kinds of full lives people do. Weren't going for a work out yourself the other day were you? I did about four hours of community service today. Split some wood, cleaned up the yard a bit, came in cracked a brew and started reading and here you are again, all day every day.

You know I laugh at you and you can rage on all,you want. Your boy is going down but I confess I am worried about 2020 or 2024. Four more years of con obstruction so long as they have 40 and I think the country might be ripe for a megalomaniac who is SMARTER than trump ( ifmyou doubt that please answer question, what's his plan other than being a maximum ass hole?) but that's the big picture. For now I will just remind you about our previous specific battles and now you fared:

Obama vs Romney
Obama vs McCain
Markey vs whatever that lightweignt's name was
Warren vs Brown

And no my heart was never behind coakley so what can I say. But anyone who has followed knows I got exercised about the races above.

Wins.

I know you are angry. It is going to go down again in November and I'll stop by to remind you that as far as the "game" of handicPng the races your are my rhymes-with-rich and all anyone needs to do is see who was on the winning side. I will be again.

And never forget in all those cases the win ing side was also the right side.

Cooking dinner with The wife and nice night ahead. Plans for tomorrow. You know what that means ....beat your chest and post post post since you are only playing against pylons. You had your head handed to you the other day and you disappeared.

What a Marroon.

Btw, you are all about security. Hear what Michael Hayden said about trump yesterday?

[Unregistered]

Troops would not obey trumps orders to kill terrorist families.

Tee hee
Bwah hah hah

Someone who should know just told you how toxic your man would be for country. Real disaster if military was compelled to ignore commander and chief.

Obama never did or discussed doing anything like that.

Tee hee

Bwah haha

Expect the drumbeat of sand people to get louder. More Hayden's will step forward.

And trumpmismyiurnidea of what this nation needs? You don't love this country and never did. Malevolent hater bent on destruction.

The adults will eventually see that the trump tantrum ends. But I hope not for a while. Not until the GOP is fully in ropes,mthen the Dems can hold out a pinky.....

[Unregistered]

When ex-CIA director tells you he would be frightened by a trump presidency what sY you ex lax?

Sounds like trump make us less secure.

Said complex nuanced issues into. Bumper stickers......he's talking about you lol

This will not be addressed by ex lax.