Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

If you think some comment scribbled in haste and hate on this board gives you pause to suspend your life and just repeat it over and over as your demented version of a public service then get help.

There are thousands of more worrisome comments. Wishing anyone a slow and painful death because of the opinions they hold is easily in same league, no? Losing any sleep over that?

How about the story trump told (which wasn't true so it's a make believe story/comment. About dipping bullets in pig's blood and shooting Muslims. You should find that a lot more worrisome.

Let's see your worried focus now.

The quote is pretty indicative of the thinking of today's "liberal" and I use that term loosely). Especially on college campuses.

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.”*

[Unregistered]

If you think some comment scribbled in haste and hate on this board gives you pause to suspend your life and just repeat it over and over as your demented version of a public service then get help.

There are thousands of more worrisome comments. Wishing anyone a slow and painful death because of the opinions they hold is easily in same league, no? Losing any sleep over that?

How about the story trump told (which wasn't true so it's a make believe story/comment. About dipping bullets in pig's blood and shooting Muslims. You should find that a lot more worrisome.

Let's see your worried focus now.

Here's something to worry about.

Iowa
Hillary Clinton 49.9%
Bernie Sanders 49.6%
Martin O'Malley 0.6%

New Hampshire
Sanders 60.4%
Clinton 38.0%
O'Malley 0.3%

Nevada
Clinton 52.6%
Sanders 47.3%
O'Malley Out

Delegates
Clinton 502
Sanders 70

And these people call themselves "Democratic"?

[Unregistered]

That's because no amendment to the Constitution says anything about separation of church and state.

Establishment clause of First Amendment has been deemed to ensure just that by Supreme Court. Regardless of fact that exact words "separation of church and state" don't appear. The court ruled in Everson v. Board of Education that "the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.

So "a wall of separation between church and state"'is the law of the land. Game, set, match.

[Unregistered]

It was just a matter of time before this nonsense was introduced. I say everyone in the world should vote in US elections. Why limit it at all.

New legislation is reportedly being pushed to give illegal immigrants the right to vote in New York City's elections next year. The New York Post reports Bertha Lewis, head of the Black Institute — part of a coalition of immigration-rights groups making the push — says a bill is expected to be introduced this spring. "We want to expand the right to vote for everybody, not suppress the vote," Lewis said, the Post reports. "What a radical idea." There are an estimated 1.3 million noncitizen residents in the city, about 500,000 of whom are undocumented. Neither group is allowed to vote. Lewis sees such legislation as as an extension of Mayor Bill de Blasio's Municipal ID card offered to all residents

[Unregistered]

That's because no amendment to the Constitution says anything about separation of church and state.

Specifically it speaks to that there will be no established religion. That means Christianity among others. But perhaps you need to read the Federalist papers or Adams, Jefferson, Webster etc opinion on the matter.

[Unregistered]

Establishment clause of First Amendment has been deemed to ensure just that by Supreme Court. Regardless of fact that exact words "separation of church and state" don't appear. The court ruled in Everson v. Board of Education that "the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.

So "a wall of separation between church and state"'is the law of the land. Game, set, match.

Just like the 2nd amendment nor any subsequent rulings state the right to bear arms includes high capacity semi automatic weapons. But Conservatives wallow in the deep end of the hypocricy pool.

[Unregistered]

It was just a matter of time before this nonsense was introduced. I say everyone in the world should vote in US elections. Why limit it at all.

New legislation is reportedly being pushed to give illegal immigrants the right to vote in New York City's elections next year. The New York Post reports Bertha Lewis, head of the Black Institute — part of a coalition of immigration-rights groups making the push — says a bill is expected to be introduced this spring. "We want to expand the right to vote for everybody, not suppress the vote," Lewis said, the Post reports. "What a radical idea." There are an estimated 1.3 million noncitizen residents in the city, about 500,000 of whom are undocumented. Neither group is allowed to vote. Lewis sees such legislation as as an extension of Mayor Bill de Blasio's Municipal ID card offered to all residents

California has essentially done the same by allowing illegals to get drivers licenses and then allowing people to register to vote through the DMV. Massachusetts will be next. That's how Democrats stay in power.

[Unregistered]

Individual thought is very dangerous and we need to stamp it out.

[Unregistered]

Establishment clause of First Amendment has been deemed to ensure just that by Supreme Court. Regardless of fact that exact words "separation of church and state" don't appear. The court ruled in Everson v. Board of Education that "the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.

So "a wall of separation between church and state"'is the law of the land. Game, set, match.

But there is nothing in the Constitution that says it and that is the point. The phrase "separation of church and state" can be traced to an 1802 letter*by*Thomas Jefferson (you know that guy that owned slaves and fathered children by one of them). While there are court cases that have repeatedly use the phrase, the Supreme Court has not always interpreted the principle as absolute. The proper extent of separation between government and religion in the U.S. remains an ongoing debate. The one thing we can probably agree is that government has no business dictating religious belief to it's citizens.

[Unregistered]

Just like the 2nd amendment nor any subsequent rulings state the right to bear arms includes high capacity semi automatic weapons. But Conservatives wallow in the deep end of the hypocricy pool.

Nor does it say they cannot. So what's your point?

[Unregistered]

Specifically it speaks to that there will be no established religion. That means Christianity among others. But perhaps you need to read the Federalist papers or Adams, Jefferson, Webster etc opinion on the matter.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Note the highlighted portion of the actual amendment which liberals like to ignore.

And then they like to lecture others on what the amendment means or does not mean. Talk about hypocrisy!

[Unregistered]

The quote is pretty indicative of the thinking of today's "liberal" and I use that term loosely). Especially on college campuses.

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.”*

“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

[Unregistered]

California has essentially done the same by allowing illegals to get drivers licenses and then allowing people to register to vote through the DMV. Massachusetts will be next. That's how Democrats stay in power.

Democrats turned the corner some time ago , in that they are more concerned with the RIGHTS of illegals then the rights of the citizens. It is just an extension of their obsession with the rights of anyone that is, in their opinion, a victim.

Case in Point, the State of Washington , with their new Transgender bathroom law. Transgender people are a " protected class, but the woman who turned around in the women's locker room and saw a naked mail standing there is not. She was told that if she was uncomfortable , she should dress elsewhere. I guess any female children there would not be a " protected class " either.

Additionally, it is illegal to have a gender neutral bathroom for Transgender people to use, but they can be made available to those who do not want to risk running into a member of the opposite sex in their gender assigned bathroom.

So the majority of those that are NOT Transgender people , have to put up with them in their gender assigned space, or they should go elsewhere.

[Unregistered]

Here's something to worry about.

Iowa
Hillary Clinton 49.9%
Bernie Sanders 49.6%
Martin O'Malley 0.6%

New Hampshire
Sanders 60.4%
Clinton 38.0%
O'Malley 0.3%

Nevada
Clinton 52.6%
Sanders 47.3%
O'Malley Out

Delegates
Clinton 502
Sanders 70

And these people call themselves "Democratic"?

Interesting how liberals just skipped over this post.

Well, here's some more numbers for you.

Bernie Sanders has positive favorability ratings. He's the only leading candidate in 2016 with positive favorability ratings. If you care about losing to a Republican this year, then you should care about this fact.

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump do not have positive favorability ratings.

59% of Americans distrust Donald Trump.

67% of Americans find Hillary Clinton "not honest and trustworthy."

Yes, more Americans trust Donald Trump than Hillary Clinton.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-go...b_9289066.html

[Unregistered]

Interesting how liberals just skipped over this post.

Well, here's some more numbers for you.

Bernie Sanders has positive favorability ratings. He's the only leading candidate in 2016 with positive favorability ratings. If you care about losing to a Republican this year, then you should care about this fact.

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump do not have positive favorability ratings.

59% of Americans distrust Donald Trump.

67% of Americans find Hillary Clinton "not honest and trustworthy."

Yes, more Americans trust Donald Trump than Hillary Clinton.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-go...b_9289066.html

Of course they would trust Trump, because warts and all, what you see is what you get. Not with Hillary. The lies, scandals, law breaking, deals, Foundation slush, on and on.

This being a Mass Board, many may not be familiar with what Trump has contributed to the New York City economy. He invested in the City of New York when it was not in a good place. He led the way with investing and building , creating thousands of jobs, and continued employment, revenue and a taxes from all those buildings. Sure, he made some poor decisions , putting his name on some deals that went belly up, but that is life in the Capitalistic fast lane.

Americans see this, know what the man is capable of. They wonder how many Jobs Hillary created , what her contributions to society were along the money trail that made her go from " dead broke " to a estimated net worth with Bill of $ 100 million. Cattle futures, Whitewater, File gate, Travel gate on and on. Some of the younger Americans need to be reminded of all the dirty deals her and Bill were involved in. Before they were even born.