Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Among states with bans, the maximum capacity is 10 to 15 rounds. Several municipalities, such as New York City, restrict magazine capacity to 5 rounds for rifles and shotguns. The state of New York previously limited magazine capacity to 7 rounds, but a District Court ruled that that ban was excessive and could not "survive intermediate scrutiny".

Most pistols sold in the U.S. are made and sold with magazines holding between 10 and 17 rounds, in reality making this the normal magazine capacity, not "high".

Kentucky hunters can stoke their AR’s with 30s or even the pricey big 60-rounders and go for coyotes, wild hogs, or any other legal varmint. The guns and their big magazines have a very real use in hunting.

I'm personally not against it, but try to be educated in my opinions before making them. While a terrible tragedy when a mass-shooting takes place, why do we let hundreds of individual murders by the criminal intent go without question? Just asking.

[Unregistered]

Among states with bans, the maximum capacity is 10 to 15 rounds. Several municipalities, such as New York City, restrict magazine capacity to 5 rounds for rifles and shotguns. The state of New York previously limited magazine capacity to 7 rounds, but a District Court ruled that that ban was excessive and could not "survive intermediate scrutiny".

Most pistols sold in the U.S. are made and sold with magazines holding between 10 and 17 rounds, in reality making this the normal magazine capacity, not "high".

Kentucky hunters can stoke their AR’s with 30s or even the pricey big 60-rounders and go for coyotes, wild hogs, or any other legal varmint. The guns and their big magazines have a very real use in hunting.

I'm personally not against it, but try to be educated in my opinions before making them. While a terrible tragedy when a mass-shooting takes place, why do we let hundreds of individual murders by the criminal intent go without question? Just asking.

clearly someone not interested in stopping mass murders.

if you weren't who ignorant you would also be aware how much deaths by firearm himicide went down overall in countries enacting gun control but despite your words you really avoid being educated about such FACTS at all costs.

[Unregistered]

clearly someone not interested in stopping mass murders.

if you weren't who ignorant you would also be aware how much deaths by firearm himicide went down overall in countries enacting gun control but despite your words you really avoid being educated about such FACTS at all costs.

Not interested? I just stated I was personally not against it. Sounds pretty clear to me.

By your train of thought, you must not care about the hundreds, thousands of individual murders taking place in cities that have very strict gun control already. Sad.

[Unregistered]

Dozens of House Democrats are staging a "sit-in" on the House floor until they are allowed a vote on a so-called "no fly, no buy" gun control bill. It is the most dramatic action by House Democrats on gun control since the Orlando shooting on June 12 that left 49 dead and 53 wounded.

I remember when nutters told us that denying a vote was undemocratic.

[Unregistered]

Not interested? I just stated I was personally not against it. Sounds pretty clear to me.

By your train of thought, you must not care about the hundreds, thousands of individual murders taking place in cities that have very strict gun control already. Sad.

Oh no i do! Thats why reaping the benefit of reducing homicides overall as a result of movers to stop mass shootings is GRAVY on top of the roast beef!

being a nutter you wouldn't want to pick that low lying fruit though because there would be a few male gun nuts who couldn't get erections anymore if there was any gun control

[Unregistered]

Oh no i do! Thats why reaping the benefit of reducing homicides overall as a result of movers to stop mass shootings is GRAVY on top of the roast beef!

being a nutter you wouldn't want to pick that low lying fruit though because there would be a few male gun nuts who couldn't get erections anymore if there was any gun control

I replied to this comment:

"Wrong. dramatic change in laws years ago. Clips strictly limited to 10. Not like no guns. Common sense."

Disgusting your careless disregard for the individual murders that far outweigh the mass murders happening today.

Sad, and disgusting.

[Unregistered]

Australia - zero mass shootings over last 20 years SINCE gun control, 13 mass shooting (define by FIVE or more victims) in the 18 years before that.

104 people died in those mass shootings.

This is not statistical noise. Gun control stopped mass shooting in a western country that once had easy access to firearms.

Explain cons.

America is not Australia. Two entirely different countries. Show me the cities like Detroit , Chicago, LA , Baltimore located down under.

Explain Libs.

But allegations are now coming forward regarding the rapes of many young military members over the years. the have plenty of skeletons of their own.

[Unregistered]

America is not Australia. Two entirely different countries. Show me the cities like Detroit , Chicago, LA , Baltimore located down under.

Explain Libs.

But allegations are now coming forward regarding the rapes of many young military members over the years. the have plenty of skeletons of their own.

Lets confiscate a half million guns and see if it does as much good. Australia is a western style democracy with lots of big cities and frontier mentality just like a lot of the USA.

you nutters set your hair on fire. american exceptionalsim. we are differe4nt in all ways right?

[Unregistered]

I replied to this comment:

"Wrong. dramatic change in laws years ago. Clips strictly limited to 10. Not like no guns. Common sense."

Disgusting your careless disregard for the individual murders that far outweigh the mass murders happening today.

Sad, and disgusting.

I told you that the same gun control measures that inhibit mass shootings have also reduced the homicides in those countries.

you choose not to hear. Of course you choose not to hear. When a con is cornered they just act stupid and transfixed like a deer int he headlights.

Loser. just like your candidate.

[Unregistered]

How does a career criminal who has a gun with no high cap clip firing off one shot at another gangster's kid get affected by eliminating a high cap clip?

Serious question.

[Unregistered]

How does a career criminal who has a gun with no high cap clip firing off one shot at another gangster's kid get affected by eliminating a high cap clip?

Serious question.

doesn't but that doesn't mean we have to TOLERATE mass shootings while we adress that different problem with guns with a solution that is as tailored to the specifics as low capacity clips address the goals of the mass shooter.

silly STUPID rabbit

[Unregistered]

How does a career criminal who has a gun with no high cap clip firing off one shot at another gangster's kid get affected by eliminating a high cap clip?

Serious question.

you've heard the expression "apples and oranges", yes?

No needs for high cap clips. period.

[Unregistered]

Trump: "I am the king of debt."

That should play well to a Republican electorate that has been told debt is the worst thing imaginable by several generations of Republican officeholders.

Obama no longer has to try to break the Republican party...he couldnt do as good a job as Trump.

[Unregistered]

doesn't but that doesn't mean we have to TOLERATE mass shootings while we adress that different problem with guns with a solution that is as tailored to the specifics as low capacity clips address the goals of the mass shooter.

silly STUPID rabbit

OK, so I guess I really am a stupid rabbit, since I can't follow. It was stated using the Australia example, that we should NOT eliminate all guns, just high cap guns. It was then stated that by eliminating the high cap guns (again using "other countries" example, assuming it was Australia again), it decreased all murders.

I asked for how, using a real-life example? It was determined that it doesn't, but that doesn't mean we have to tolerate mass shootings. I previously stated I was in favor of more control.

Then, you kicked in with the name calling.

So, I guess you lost me with the circular argument.

[Unregistered]

Obama no longer has to try to break the Republican party....

Pretty telling statement right there. Assume then you agree he was, and trying to break down 48% of the country to fall in line with him.

Interesting.