Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Nah, because conservative believe "s hit happens". Libs are the hypocrites that throw a hissy fit when they incite a reaction and get what they asked for. That's what makes the news in conservative media. We love laughing at the hypocrisy of liberals.

Nice.

When people get assaulted by conservatives they are just getting what they asked for.

You and people like you are the enemy of our society. Now that your cartoon candidate is showing his mettle is as incompetent as yours, you will just be huddling together int bitterness.

Till your kind dies out. Two more generations but after one you will be a tiny rump minority that we need to remain wary of situationally but LAUGH at overall.

Very successful you are your "movement" are.

[Unregistered]

Another example of the left's attempt to censor anything they don't like hearing.

The Obama White House Just Censored A Foreign Leader Who Mentioned ‘Islamist Terrorism’

APRIL*1, 2016 By*Sean Davis

http://thefederalist.com/2016/04/01/...ist-terrorism/

President Barack Obama and French President Francois Hollande met in Washington on Thursday to discuss ways for the two countries to work together to defeat terrorism. But the White House apparently had zero appetite for Hollande’s mention of Islamist terrorism, since it censored the phrase from the official White House video of the meeting posted on the White House website.

While the official transcript available on the White House web page includes Hollande’s use of the phrase “Islamist terrorism,” the White House video of the remarks muted the audio during that portion of Hollande’s remarks. The audio of the French-to-English interpreter stops right before Hollande characterizes “Islamist terrorism” as the root of terrorism in Syria and Iraq.

Compare and contrast with Trump's statement that he plans for government employees to sign non disclosure agreements. Government transparency, take one step back! Whistleblowers, get measured for your orange jump suits! Turn up the malfeasance.

You cons are actually too stupid to live. Heard of the Darwin awards? Thank goodness you have competent, sane people CARRYING you

[Unregistered]

I call BS on this one written by the same guy who said he stood out in a driving rain waiting for an anonymous poster to meet him.

BTW there are no liberal talk radio hosts, because any attempt to have one has resulted in failure. Nobody will listen to them.

We don't need talk shows. We have NPR which dispenses facts. The nutters need beck rush etc. so they can indulge their stupid little fantasies.

[Unregistered]

Compare and contrast with Trump's statement that he plans for government employees to sign non disclosure agreements. Government transparency, take one step back! Whistleblowers, get measured for your orange jump suits! Turn up the malfeasance.

You cons are actually too stupid to live. Heard of the Darwin awards? Thank goodness you have competent, sane people CARRYING you

You libs just make it too easy to set straight.


Obama Has Sentenced Whistleblowers to 31 Times the Jail Time of All Prior U.S. Presidents COMBINED

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/...-combined.html

The Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined.

This administration has also obtained much longer jail sentences against whistleblowers than previous presidents.

ACLU legislative counsel Gabe Rottman noted last October:


"The Obama administration has secured 526 months of prison time for national security leakers, versus only 24 months total jail time for everyone else since the American Revolution."


Top mainstream reporters also say the Obama administration is more hostile to the free press – the folks who spread whistleblower leaks – than any other in history.

Indeed, the Obama administration is treating reporters like criminals … or terrorists:
◾Obama has gone after top reporters. His Department of Justice labeled chief Fox News Washington correspondent James Rosen a “criminal co-conspirator” in a leak case, and for many years threatened to prosecute Pulitzer-prize winning New York Times journalist James Risen
◾The Obama administration also spied on Risen, Rosen, the Associated Press, CBS reporter Cheryl Atkinson and other media
◾In fact, top NSA whistleblowers tell Washington’s Blog that the NSA has spied on reporters for well over a decade … to make sure they don’t reveal illegal government programs
◾The Pentagon smeared USA Today reporters because they investigated illegal Pentagon propaganda
◾Reporters covering the Occupy protests were targeted for arrest
◾The government admits that journalists could be targeted with counter-terrorism laws (and here). For example, after Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges, journalist Naomi Wolf, Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and others sued the government to enjoin the NDAA’s allowance of the indefinite detention of Americans – the judge asked the government attorneys 5 times whether journalists like Hedges could be indefinitely detained simply for interviewing and then writing about bad guys. The government refused to promise that journalists like Hedges won’t be thrown in a dungeon for the rest of their lives without any right to talk to a judge
◾In an effort to protect Bank of America from the threatened Wikileaks expose of the bank’s wrongdoing, the Department of Justice told Bank of America to a hire a specific hardball-playing law firm to assemble a team to take down WikiLeaks (and see this)
◾The NSA and its British counterpart treated Wikileaks like a terrorist organization, going so far as to target its employees politically, and to spy on visitors to its website

[Unregistered]

We don't need talk shows. We have NPR which dispenses facts. The nutters need beck rush etc. so they can indulge their stupid little fantasies.

Of course you don't. People who are close minded only want to hear what confirms their own bias. And that is EXACTLY why conservatives hold the advantage. They can't avoid hearing the liberal version. Sorry Libby, that's a fact. A fact that is more and more proven (dare I say it?) SCIENCE.

Bwahahahaha!

[Unregistered]

Nice.

When people get assaulted by conservatives they are just getting what they asked for.

You and people like you are the enemy of our society. Now that your cartoon candidate is showing his mettle is as incompetent as yours, you will just be huddling together int bitterness.

Till your kind dies out. Two more generations but after one you will be a tiny rump minority that we need to remain wary of situationally but LAUGH at overall.

Very successful you are your "movement" are.

Bwahahahaha! Don't want to get beat up, than don't get in the face of a Trump supporter at a Trump rally.

https://i.imgflip.com/10rfx9.jpg

[Unregistered]

This pretty much sums up the difference between a Bernie's supporter and a Trump supporter.

https://scottthong.files.wordpress.c...teaparty01.jpg

[Unregistered]

And let's not forget this comparison.

https://scottthong.files.wordpress.c...rtyarrests.jpg

[Unregistered]

Noooooooo

Im addressing your CATEGORICAL statement that you poor, butt hurt conservatives do not have any representation in media.

So in addition to ignoring FOX, CNN (it was the Donald Trump network early on and continues to trend to the right). NPR increasingly drifts rightward. Has for years.

So you get it nutter? You are moving the goalposts in the MIDDLE of the discussion once again to cover up fact you know NOTHING.

Again the point was your statement that cons aren't represented in media.

All I did was proved you wrong. As usual

Game, set, match. Have a nice day

Bwahahahaha! I move the goal posts??? The issue is the vast majority of media only presents a liberal version of the news because the vast majority of media is LIBERAL. I've proven that in these discussions over and over and over again. For the smahtest guy in the forum you sure are dense.

NPR continues to trend to the right? Bwahahahaha! You must be jesting. If that were actually true it's because they are losing audience. Just like MSNBC is starting to make changes to their format for the sake of $$$$$$.

[Unregistered]

Noooooooo

Im addressing your CATEGORICAL statement that you poor, butt hurt conservatives do not have any representation in media.

So in addition to ignoring FOX, CNN (it was the Donald Trump network early on and continues to trend to the right). NPR increasingly drifts rightward. Has for years.

So you get it nutter? You are moving the goalposts in the MIDDLE of the discussion once again to cover up fact you know NOTHING.

Again the point was your statement that cons aren't represented in media.

All I did was proved you wrong. As usual

Game, set, match. Have a nice day

So I guess once again, I will have to set Mr. Smaht guy straight.

How Biased Is Your Media?

http://freakonomics.com/podcast/how-...is-your-media/

Tim Groseclose and Jeff Milyo estimate how left-wing or right-wing media outlets are based on what research by think tanks they mention in their stories. They then compare that to the think-tank research that elected officials cite when they talk on the House or Senate floor, to calibrate where the media fits relative to the Congress. They find some interesting answers: most of the media does have a liberal bias (throwing out the editorial page, the Wall Street Journal is the most liberal of all, even beating the New York Times!). Fox News is one of the few outlets that is right of center.

Here’s how 20 major media outlets rank on Groseclose and Milyo’s slant scale, with 100 representing the most liberal and zero the most conservative:


ABC Good Morning America 56.1

ABC World News Tonight 61.0

CBS Early Show 66.6

CBS Evening News 73.7

CNN News Night with Aaron Brown 56.0

Drudge Report 60.4

Fox News Spec. Rept. w/ Brit Hume 39.7

Los Angeles Times 70.0

NBC Nightly News 61.6

NBC Today Show 64.0

New York Times 73.7

Newshour with Jim Lehrer 55.8

Newsweek 66.3

NPR Morning Edition 66.3

Time Magazine 65.4

U.S. News and World Report 65.8

USA Today 63.4

Wall Street Journal 85.1

Washington Post 66.6

Washington Times 35.4

[Unregistered]

Conservatives Are Right: The Media Is Very Liberal

http://fortune.com/2015/11/02/liberal-media/

Study after study has shown that the mainstream media leans left, and that, as economists Tim Groseclose and Jeff Milyo have written, “an almost overwhelming fraction of journalists are liberal.” The extent of this bias, of course, depends on what your definitions of liberal and conservative. And the media has other, arguably more important, biases: towards controversy and producing content that is profitable. But it is safe to say that the median journalist in America is to the left of the median American voter, and that this affects how the news is presented to the public.

Yes, we have seen the rise of Fox News, America’s most watched cable news network. And there has been a proliferation of small conservative websites. But most Americans still get their news from television, and the ratings of network news broadcasts—the same organizations that conservatives claim have been biased for decades—triple the ratings of even Fox’s most popular programs. This state of affairs is very distressing to conservatives, who, along with independents, increasingly distrust the news media.


When economist Daniel Sutter examined the question of how a liberal media can persist in a free market, his most convincing explanation was that journalists themselves, and the type of person who aspires to journalism, are almost uniformly of a liberal disposition. “People with the talent, temperament, and personality to be journalists might also be inclined toward liberal political causes,” he writes.

[Unregistered]

"Just as liberals dominate academia, journalism, and other writing professions, there are nearly three times as many liberal- as conservative-minded people in the creative arts according to a recent study. Alison Dagnes, a professor of political science at Shippensburg University, argues that the same personality traits that shape political preferences also guide the choice of professions."

http://www.theatlantic.com/entertain...tewart/385480/

[Unregistered]

Wrong again. Don't work for state or any branch of government. Wrong wrong wrong on each and every fact but they need to believe what they need to believe to keep their heads from exploding with cognitive dissonance.

So i guess it isn't same difference after all?

Teehee
bawl hahah
its Sunday so nutter cons must be wrong.

Im a small businessman now. Think employees, taxes, etc. I know that is inconsistent with your memes but just the way it is.

Bwahahahaha!

OK Perfesser Perspective.

[Unregistered]

Read it and weep!

So I guess once again, I will have to set Mr. Smaht guy straight.

How Biased Is Your Media?

http://freakonomics.com/podcast/how-...is-your-media/

Tim Groseclose and Jeff Milyo estimate how left-wing or right-wing media outlets are based on what research by think tanks they mention in their stories. They then compare that to the think-tank research that elected officials cite when they talk on the House or Senate floor, to calibrate where the media fits relative to the Congress. They find some interesting answers: most of the media does have a liberal bias (throwing out the editorial page, the Wall Street Journal is the most liberal of all, even beating the New York Times!). Fox News is one of the few outlets that is right of center.

Here’s how 20 major media outlets rank on Groseclose and Milyo’s slant scale, with 100 representing the most liberal and zero the most conservative:


ABC Good Morning America 56.1

ABC World News Tonight 61.0

CBS Early Show 66.6

CBS Evening News 73.7

CNN News Night with Aaron Brown 56.0

Drudge Report 60.4

Fox News Spec. Rept. w/ Brit Hume 39.7

Los Angeles Times 70.0

NBC Nightly News 61.6

NBC Today Show 64.0

New York Times 73.7

Newshour with Jim Lehrer 55.8

Newsweek 66.3

NPR Morning Edition 66.3

Time Magazine 65.4

U.S. News and World Report 65.8

USA Today 63.4

Wall Street Journal 85.1

Washington Post 66.6

Washington Times 35.4

representative of the population. Majority USA

[Unregistered]

representative of the population. Majority USA

I guess you can't read.

it is safe to say that the median journalist in America is to the left of the median American voter, and that this affects how the news is presented to the pubic..... you would think that if there’s demand for more conservative media, the free market would provide it.... why hasn’t the free market corrected this imbalance between the demand for conservative news and the supply? It’s because economic outcomes are driven by much more than supply and demand. Institutions, rules, and power matter just as much as what consumers demand.

http://fortune.com/2015/11/02/liberal-media/