Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

If the RCP average weren’t juiced by the Rasmussen and Fox polls it would be down around 43% which is where 538 has him.

Hey Cons, sorry to break this to you, but Trump isn’t getting re-elected with a 43% approval rating. You can dream though.

A week ago, the pundits were writing Biden's obituary. Then this week Biden skunked Sanders in SC, outpacing the poll numbers by leaps and bounds and the same held true on Super Tuesday, when voters across the country ran from Sanders and from Michael Bloomberg, who acted as a backup choice to Biden.

The fight hasn't even begun. Both these candidates give Trump so much ammunition for political ads. If anyone thinks Bloomberg's backing will make a difference, then you have to answer the question of why spending a half billion dollars on a primary run didn't work for Mini Mike. His money which will probably go to backing Biden may actually backfire. It already has among the Bernie Bros.

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...2f&oe=5E927AF0

[Unregistered]

Don’t know what you’re trying to say. Don’t think you do either. Lol

So I guess that means you have no idea. It's pretty easy to look up if you take the time.

[Unregistered]

Remind me again, what was Trump’s job approval rating in 2016?

Oh, that’s right. He didn’t have one. Well, guess what, this time around he does. And it ain’t pretty with the election 8 months away.

Remind me, what was Clinton's job approval in 2016?

What's Joe Biden's job approval today?

[Unregistered]

I have a advanced degree in the subject matter at hand and you are clueless but I will challenge you again to link one scientifically credible source that backs up your claim.

Of course, if you can’t support what you are saying all the readers see that you put the lives and health and economic well being of your fellow citizens behind your fealty to maintaining the lies about the emperor who clearly has no clothes

How's this?

https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance...esSectionTitle

Again, pretty easy to look up if you take the time.

[Unregistered]

So I guess that means you have no idea. It's pretty easy to look up if you take the time.

Instead of just waving your hands around in the air why don’t you just come right out and say what you’re trying to say?

[Unregistered]

A week ago, the pundits were writing Biden's obituary. Then this week Biden skunked Sanders in SC, outpacing the poll numbers by leaps and bounds and the same held true on Super Tuesday, when voters across the country ran from Sanders and from Michael Bloomberg, who acted as a backup choice to Biden.

The fight hasn't even begun. Both these candidates give Trump so much ammunition for political ads. If anyone thinks Bloomberg's backing will make a difference, then you have to answer the question of why spending a half billion dollars on a primary run didn't work for Mini Mike. His money which will probably go to backing Biden may actually backfire. It already has among the Bernie Bros.

https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...2f&oe=5E927AF0

Bloomberg wrecked the liberal media narrative about Russia giving Trump the 2016 election with $200K - $300K in Facebook ads. Bloomberg spent a half billion and all he got was 50 delegates.

Bwahahaha!

[Unregistered]

Hey Cons, dare you to click this link.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...247.html#polls

[Unregistered]

Hey Cons, dare you to click this link.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...247.html#polls

Believe me I've been watching it ever since Clinton had a 95% chance to beat Trump in 2016.

[Unregistered]

CENK UYGUR, THE YOUNG TURKS: It's not over. Now we're in a tie. And now we got absolute dig-in warfare against the establishment. So you want to go to war? We'll go to war. And that is what this is. We cannot let Biden win. Guys, not just on progressives versus establishment. This is so important that I need you to understand this: Biden is not going to beat Trump. Biden is either near senile or actually senile. Watch any of the tapes. And Biden lies nonstop. He is going to get caught! Okay, the media is covering for him but they're not going to be able to cover when the Republicans come for him and when Trump comes for him. He's not going to beat Trump!

[Unregistered]

Believe me I've been watching it ever since Clinton had a 95% chance to beat Trump in 2016.

So holding out for a Hail Mary?
Good Luck!

[Unregistered]

How's this?

https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance...esSectionTitle

Again, pretty easy to look up if you take the time.

1) The article there is a recent paper about what we have known about for years. This is why we never bothered finishing the SARS vaccine ....

2) you haven’t linked to anything about COVID-19 showing the appearance of a variant. You also do not have a crystal ball and can’t tell us whether a variant will
Be more virulent, not less. After all, a “variant” in pangolin-CoV that led to a single amino acid change in the “spike” protein of the virus is what allowed this virus to acquire human host specificity.

Just to show my chops, some of you taking ACE-2 inhibitors for high blood pressure might find it fun to know that the receptor that your drug targets is the same one COVID-19 uses to get into human cells.

3) are you aware that the mode of transmission for COVID-19 is closer to H1N1 than SARS? Perhaps you would like to reevaluate your claims given that?

Let’s see what ya got!

[Unregistered]

Let's be frank: Biden is clearly suffering some kind of cognitive decline. He performed horribly in almost all of the debates, frequently rambling off on bizarre tangents. He opened his speech Tuesday night by mixing up his wife and his sister. He also has a habit of making up fake stories — like that he was involved in civil rights protests, or that a general asked him to honor a brave soldier, or most recently, he was arrested in South Africa trying to visit Nelson Mandela. None of these things happened.

Biden's appalling record is also utterly at odds with the modern Democratic Party's branding. He voted for the Iraq War, and defended that vote for months afterwards. He was a key architect of the bankruptcy bill that made it impossible to get rid of student loan debt, and various crime and war on drugs bills that threw millions of Americans in prison. He tried repeatedly to cut Social Security and Medicare, and voted for multiple rounds of financial deregulation. (That is just scratching the surface.)

In short, Joe Biden could very easily lose to Trump. Unlike Obama, he is not some once-in-a-generation political talent. He is a fading, washed-up operator with decades of baggage who has lost a step or three. Nominating him would be a terrific gamble — and given his record and staffing choices (one of his top policy advisers is the architect of the disastrous 1996 welfare reform), a gamble with very little upside.
https://theweek.com/articles/899790/...ernie-comeback

[Unregistered]

Of course , if we could TEST all the hand waving can stop ...but ...

“The Trump admin won't be able to meet its promised timeline of having a million coronavirus tests available by the end of the week, senators said after a briefing from health officials.”

So I think at this moment we need to get on top of this “Brownie” moment

[Unregistered]

1) The article there is a recent paper about what we have known about for years. This is why we never bothered finishing the SARS vaccine ....

2) you haven’t linked to anything about COVID-19 showing the appearance of a variant. You also do not have a crystal ball and can’t tell us whether a variant will
Be more virulent, not less. After all, a “variant” in pangolin-CoV that led to a single amino acid change in the “spike” protein of the virus is what allowed this virus to acquire human host specificity.

Just to show my chops, some of you taking ACE-2 inhibitors for high blood pressure might find it fun to know that the receptor that your drug targets is the same one COVID-19 uses to get into human cells.

3) are you aware that the mode of transmission for COVID-19 is closer to H1N1 than SARS? Perhaps you would like to reevaluate your claims given that?

Let’s see what ya got!

Hello? Did you even read it? No you did not.

Our results provide novel insights into tracing the intermediate natural host of SARS-CoV-2. With population genetic analyses of 103 genomes of SARS-CoV-2, we found that
SARS-CoV-2 viruses evolved into two major types (L and S types), and the two types were
well defined by just two SNPs that show nearly complete linkage across SARS-CoV-2 strains. Although the L type (~70%) was more prevalent than the S type (~30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, our evolutionary analyses suggested the S type was most likely the more ancient version of SARS-CoV-2. Our results also support the idea that the L type is more aggressive than the S type.

.... In summary, our analyses of 103 sequenced SARS-CoV-2 genomes suggest that the L type is more aggressive than the S type and that human interference may have shifted the relative abundance of L and S type soon after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. As previously noted [19], the data examined in this study are still very limited, and follow-up analyses of a larger set of data are needed to have a better understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2. There is a strong need for further immediate, comprehensive studies that combine genomic data, epidemiological data, and chart records of the clinical symptoms of patients with SARS-CoV-2.

[Unregistered]

1) The article there is a recent paper about what we have known about for years. This is why we never bothered finishing the SARS vaccine ....

2) you haven’t linked to anything about COVID-19 showing the appearance of a variant. You also do not have a crystal ball and can’t tell us whether a variant will
Be more virulent, not less. After all, a “variant” in pangolin-CoV that led to a single amino acid change in the “spike” protein of the virus is what allowed this virus to acquire human host specificity.

Just to show my chops, some of you taking ACE-2 inhibitors for high blood pressure might find it fun to know that the receptor that your drug targets is the same one COVID-19 uses to get into human cells.

3) are you aware that the mode of transmission for COVID-19 is closer to H1N1 than SARS? Perhaps you would like to reevaluate your claims given that?

Let’s see what ya got!

Hold on a second. Do you actually have a medical background that would allow you to debunk these absurd Trump supporters' claims that the virus isn't so bad and so don't you dare ask why our government completely blew it with those pesky little test kits? That's really not fair. Much better to argue with the Alex Joneses of the world and the Pizzagate enthusiasts. Facts don't matter in Trump world. Much better to assume the virus is no big deal. That way no need to worry about the government's incompetence.