Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

"When CIA traitor Aldrich Ames was asked why he spied, he explained, “I know what's best for foreign policy and national security....and I'm going to act on that.”

Though Mr. Vindman is not a traitor, his testimony on Ukraine & Trump shows he shares the logic and hubris of one." - Bryan Dean Wright, registered Democrat and former CIA ops officer

[Unregistered]

"This Alexander Vindman ordeal is merely a guy who is upset w/ how the president is conducting foreign policy & wants to criminalize FP wrong think. It's really nothing more than that. NSC officials have no mandate. POTUS does. Dems+media using it to bolster weak impeachment case."
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/...ume-fallacy%2F

[Unregistered]

"NSC staff are not supposed to wear military uniform. Why did Alex Vindman turn up for his testimony today in full uniform? It's political theatre. A coup. Because these people don't like Trump's America First foreign policy."

https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/sta...ume-fallacy%2F

[Unregistered]

"When CIA traitor Aldrich Ames was asked why he spied, he explained, “I know what's best for foreign policy and national security....and I'm going to act on that.”

Though Mr. Vindman is not a traitor, his testimony on Ukraine & Trump shows he shares the logic and hubris of one." - Bryan Dean Wright, registered Democrat and former CIA ops officer

This guy has found a nice cushy spot on Fox telling the lickspittles what they want to hear. Here are some of his headlines since Trump became president...

“I’m a Democrat but my party needs to wake up and realize open borders are not fiscally sustainable.”

“I’m a Democrat but there’s something great about Trump’s travel ban.”

“I’m a Democrat but I gotta admit it’s now Trump 2, Dems 0.”

“I’m a Democrat but we must think about this story when we consider abortion.”

“I’m a Democrat but Nancy Pelosi is totally clueless about what Democrats need to do to win.”

“I’m a Democrat and I’m ashamed at how time deaf we’ve become.”

“I’m a Democrat and it’s time for our party to apologize to America.”

“I’m a frustrated Democrat. I’m not sure Obama could have beaten Trump. Here’s why.”

“I’m a Democrat (and ex-CIA) but the spies plotting against Trump are out of control.”


He also says Democrats...

-have to adopt policies that are centrist and accommodating;

-must accept that open borders are not fiscally sustainable;

-should be wary of joining NFL protests and need to know that “Trump is right to say that sports stars like Kaepernick aren’t helping the nation’s racial divide when they take a knee in protest of America’s cops”;

-should stop saying Islam is “a religion of peace”;

-are wrong to dismiss Rep. Devin Nunes’ (R-CA) FBI memo;

-should realize that Trump is right on North Korea.

[Unregistered]

He really mixed it up when he said “I’m a *frustrated* Democrat...”

Lol!

[Unregistered]

"NSC staff are not supposed to wear military uniform. Why did Alex Vindman turn up for his testimony today in full uniform? It's political theatre. A coup. Because these people don't like Trump's America First foreign policy."

https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/sta...ume-fallacy%2F

Probably because he suspected the Con smear machine would try to paint him as unpatriotic and a traitor and he wanted to make it more difficult for them to do so. And of course, if that’s what he thought, he was absolutely right.

[Unregistered]

Once again hearsay. It doesn't change a thing, much to your consternation.

And btw if testimony is done in secret, how is this getting out to the press?

Cuomo pointed out the fact that, other than “I guess” Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s testimony, no other witnesses seemed to consider Trump’s actions on the call illegal or an abuse of power, though many have expressed dissatisfaction in other ways.

“Do you think that hurts you?” Cuomo asked. “Because it certainly bolsters the courage of Republicans to say, even Mr. Morrison today, ‘yeah, they all saw it for what it was but they didn’t think it was a crime.'”

You are getting your open hearings with all the rights you want and more.

Truth shall set you free so please 😢 😭 😢 😭 😢 more you little ❄️!

[Unregistered]

"NSC staff are not supposed to wear military uniform. Why did Alex Vindman turn up for his testimony today in full uniform? It's political theatre. A coup. Because these people don't like Trump's America First foreign policy."

https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/sta...ume-fallacy%2F

That 🐕 just ain’t gonna Hunt!

😢 😭 😢 more . It’s really the only thing you do well.

[Unregistered]

"This Alexander Vindman ordeal is merely a guy who is upset w/ how the president is conducting foreign policy & wants to criminalize FP wrong think. It's really nothing more than that. NSC officials have no mandate. POTUS does. Dems+media using it to bolster weak impeachment case."
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/...ume-fallacy%2F

You are DESPERATE to smear this man today. So much so that - well how long have you gone most mornings before mentioning “tee hee”

But the talking points are out! Smear Vindman !


Good luck cons. trump got boos at a mixed martial arts event. You would THINK that was his crowd

[Unregistered]

He really mixed it up when he said “I’m a *frustrated* Democrat...”

Lol!

Well done .

Thanks

[Unregistered]

Tax returns one step closer to seeing daylight. Only the Supremes left as a backstop.

Good luck cons! The appeal panel was 3-0 but maybe the supremes will “handle” it for him

Maybe ....not likely

😂

[Unregistered]

The Military-Intelligence Complex

At various times, an entire pantheon of retired generals and intelligence directors has gone to Twitter or progressive cable channels like CNN and MSNBC to declare the president of the United States either a Russian asset and thus a traitor, or unfit for office, or in some other way to call for his removal before the election of 2020—for some, seemingly in violation of the code of military conduct that forbids even retired officers from defaming the commander-in-chief. None cited any felonious conduct on Trump’s part; all were infuriated either by presidential comportment and tone or policies with which they disagreed.

One can disagree with Trump’s decision to pull a small contingent of tripwire troops back from the frontlines in Syria as Kurds (our current friends, but not our long-standing legal allies) and Turks (our long-standing legal allies, but not our current friends) fight each other, or see the logic of not putting even small numbers of U.S. troops in the middle of a Syrian quagmire.

The choice is a bad/worse dilemma, one that involves the likelihood either of not defending de facto allies or getting into a shooting scenario against de jure allies. So why would retired General John Allen instead attack the commander-in-chief in moral terms rather than merely criticize the president’s strategic or operational judgment: “There is blood on Trump’s hands for abandoning our Kurdish allies”?

Again, when our best and brightest former generals and admirals inform the nation that the current elected president, with whom they disagree on both Middle East and border security policies, is “immoral” and “cruel” or deserves bloodguilt, or is the equivalent of a fascist dictator or similar to those who set up Nazi death camps, is not the obvious inference that someone must put an end to the supposed fascistic/Nazi takeover of the government?

Apparently so.

Note again, the common thread in all these complaints is not demonstrable high crimes and misdemeanors but rather sharp policy disagreements with the president about the Middle East, or the president’s own retaliatory and sometimes crass pushbacks, usually against prior ad hominem attacks both from serving and retired military officers, or false claims that Trump was a veritable asset, something refuted by Robert Mueller’s 22-month, $35-million-dollar investigation of “collusion.”

An ascendant progressive view is that our armed forces CIA, FBI, and NSA are protectors of civil liberties and progressive values, and therefore are to be lauded for almost any rhetorical attacks on the president deemed necessary to remind the country of the danger that Trump supposedly poses.

Gone are the old days when Hollywood’s “Dr. Strangelove” warned us of supposed Curtis LeMay-reactionaries, or the 1964 political melodrama, “Seven Days in May,” that envisioned a future right-wing military coup against an idealistic president in the mold of Adlai Stevenson.

Instead, the military in the present age—or at least its Beltway incarnation—has been recalibrated by the Left as a kindred progressive Washington institution, perhaps because of its necessary ability to enact change by fiat all without the mess, delay, and acrimony of legislative and executive bickering.

Today there has arisen a quite different—and far more dangerous—calculus in which the media canonizes rather than audits retired officers who compare the commander-in-chief to a fascist, declare him unfit, or dream of his “sooner the better” removal. Had any of the current generals said anything similar about President Obama in the fashion they now routinely attack Trump, their public careers would have been ruined.

Attacking Trump in “contemptuous” fashion is not speaking truth to power but a confirmation of the existing status quo of the media, progressive orthodoxy, and the general Washington bipartisan bureaucracy.

The result is that many retired high-ranking officers have made the necessary adjustments. Many have gone well beyond legitimately articulating why Trump may be wrong on foreign policy, and now feel free to malign, insult, and even dream of removing their commander-in-chief, on the grounds that Trump is sui generis, that the media will applaud their efforts, and that the bipartisan foreign-policy establishment will canonize their deep-state bravery.

So it is now the decision of many ex-intelligence heads and flag officers to change the rules of the game. They will live to rue the ensuing harm to the reputations both of the intelligence services and the military at large.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/11/03/t...gence-complex/

[Unregistered]

^^^^^

You can smell the fear

[Unregistered]

^^^^^

You can smell the fear

Fear and paranoia. The deep state myth is just that.

[Unregistered]

Tax returns one step closer to seeing daylight. Only the Supremes left as a backstop.

Good luck cons! The appeal panel was 3-0 but maybe the supremes will “handle” it for him

Maybe ....not likely

😂

One of the women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct- he of course trashed her and accused her of lying - is suing him for defamation. Turnabout is fair play.