Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

May 2,2019

U.S. Steel to spend $1 billion on Mon Valley Works

https://www.post-gazette.com/busines...s/201905020023

[Unregistered]

I have an exercise for Con. Please copy and paste text from within any of those three articles where it says that Barr will be held in contempt for failing to show for last Thursday’s hearing.

They all talk about how he might be held in contempt if he misses this coming Monday’s 9 am deadline to produce the unredacted Mueller report, but none of the three say that it would be because of missing the hearing.

But go ahead, try.

I just did. Can't you read?

The first was that his failure to show up and testify about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report was a threat to the Constitution and an “attack on American democracy,” in the words of the committee’s chairman, Jerry Nadler—so much so that it justified the rare punishment of being held in contempt of Congress.

And not a single conservative source among them.

So we can either assume the lib media got it wrong AGAIN - Fake News. Or we might assume, someone went to the Dems and said after their threats, "You can't threaten Barr with contempt for not showing up. Try threatening him for not provided a full copy of the Mueller report." Sort of backpedaling on the contempt threat, just like you're doing. Even then they haven't much of a leg to stand on.

[Unregistered]

Ok, so you can’t provide a quote from Nadler or anyone else in a similar position.

I’ll post the contempt citation hear when it’s available.

[Unregistered]

What dopes the Dems are. They are threatening to hold Barr in contempt for not showing up yesterday. They can't hold him for contempt, because he volunteered to speak to the House. They would have had to have subpoenaed him in order to charge him with contempt.

Bahahahaha!

As a refresher here is Con’s original post.

[Unregistered]

This is just ONE California county.

“When you add the $550 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for healthcare, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county taxpayers exceeds $1.6 billion dollars a year,” Antonovich said in a statement. “These costs do not even include the hundreds of millions of dollars spent annually for education.”

https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013...oD9KgiYEvqnyqU

Yesterday four people are presumed drowned when the boat they were in overturned as they crossed the rain swollen Rio Grand trying to enter the US illegally - a 10 month old boy, his 6-year-old brother, their mother and a 7 year old cousin.

Meanwhile Democrats are in the House eating fried chicken instead of doing the job they were elected to do.

Who votes for these people???

How do the Democrats think they are going to win with the Schitt they are pulling? I just don't get it.

- the unemployment rate down to a 49-year low and wages are up. The amount of money the average worker earns, meanwhile, rose 6 cents to $27.77 an hour with low-wage workers having experienced the fastest pay increases.

- Nasdaq and S&P both had record closings in April and the Dow remains well over 26,000.

- 59% of Americans say Trump should not be impeached.

- 69% think Congress ought to investigate the origins of the Justice Department's inquiry into Russian interference

- 71% opposed illegals being allowed to vote while only 29% said they supported the move.

- 75% of registered voters opposed allowing 17-year-olds to vote. 84% opposed allowing 16-year-olds to vote.

- Trump's job performance has improved among Independents, going from 36% at the beginning of the year to 46%.

- only one in 10 registered voters want the equivalent of Medicare for all if it means abolishing private health insurance plans.

- By a ratio of 3-to-1 Americans oppose abortion after 20 weeks. This includes about 8 in 10 Republicans and independents and nearly 6 in 10 Democrats.

- 80% of Americans support limiting abortion to the first three months of a pregnancy. This included nearly two-thirds of those identifying as pro-choice and a similar number of Democrats (64%).

[Unregistered]

As a refresher here is Con’s original post.

No refresher required. Just a repeat of what the Daily Beast, NBC News, New York Times, and Washington Post wrote. It's pretty obvious from how these reports were initially written that Dems were making false threats based on Barr's no show. And btw, it's interesting that the NYT has changed their headline all together now.

Dems' Response to Barr’s No-Show: Threats of Contempt and Buckets of KFC
https://www.thedailybeast.com/democr...buckets-of-kfc

The first was that his failure to show up and testify about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report was a threat to the Constitution and an “attack on American democracy,” in the words of the committee’s chairman, Jerry Nadler—so much so that it justified the rare punishment of being held in contempt of Congress.

Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt for not showing up for House hearing
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news...ng-58747973971

Democrats Threaten Barr with Contempt After He No-Shows House
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/u...r-mueller.html

Barr’s no-show triggers contempt threats
https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...6d5_story.html

[Unregistered]

And Con just keeps reposting the same things over and over. None of which contains a quote from Nadler that he intends to hold Barr in contempt for failing to appear before the House Judiciary Committee.

[Unregistered]

C’mon Con. You pride yourself on your use of Google.
Find a quote from Nadler where he says he intends to hold Barr in contempt for failing to appear. Should be easy, right?

[Unregistered]

C’mon Con. You pride yourself on your use of Google.
Find a quote from Nadler where he says he intends to hold Barr in contempt for failing to appear. Should be easy, right?

In the past just using “I’m hearing...” as a source has always been plenty sufficient for the drivel on here.

Now we want signed affidavits.

Interesting

[Unregistered]

Con is feeling butthurt because he couldn’t back up his lie. Lol

[Unregistered]

10 days or so until Mueller testifies before the House. He seems to have no interest in testifying to the Senate.

Donnie has changed his mind and says Mueller should not be allowed to testify. Barr has previously said that he had no problem with Mueller testifying. Let’s see if Barr now switches to agreement with Trump. Lol

The sky is about to fall on your little pumpkin heads Cons.

[Unregistered]

Wrong again lefties....this is like clubbing a baby seal.

Con is feeling butthurt because he couldn’t back up his lie. Lol

By Dareh Gregorian, Mike Memoli and Alex Moe

The House Judiciary Committee will vote Wednesday to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt after he failed to comply with a subpoena to provide Congress with an unredacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and the underlying evidence, the panel announced Monday.

The committee's move is the first step toward holding Barr in contempt of Congress, escalating the battle between the White House and Congress over Democrats’ oversight requests and raising for the first time the prospect of an impeachment inquiry.

The panel had initially demanded that Barr turn over the unredacted report by May 1, and then made him a counteroffer after he let that deadline slip.




What to expect as Nadler moves to hold Barr in contempt of Congress
MAY 6, 201902:50

"Even in redacted form, the Special Counsel’s report offers disturbing evidence and analysis that President Trump engaged in obstruction of justice at the highest levels," the panel's chairman, Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said in a statement Monday. "Congress must see the full report and underlying evidence to determine how to best move forward with oversight, legislation, and other constitutional responsibilities."

"The Attorney General’s failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report,” Nadler continued.

If the committee signs off on the panel's contempt resolution, it then would go to a vote in the full House. The timing of that vote would be up to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The ranking Republican on the panel, Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, said Barr could not comply with the subpoena because it contains grand jury information that he's not legally entitled to share.

[Unregistered]

Con's has a head full of bad wiring. Here is what he said a few days ago...


What dopes the Dems are. They are threatening to hold Barr in contempt for not showing up yesterday. They can't hold him for contempt, because he volunteered to speak to the House. They would have had to have subpoenaed him in order to charge him with contempt.

Bahahahaha!


Now, he posts an article that Dems are going to hold Barr in contempt for failing to produce the full unredacted Mueller report and tries to act like this is proof he was right.

Lol!

[Unregistered]

Margaret Thatcher says hello

[Unregistered]

Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor.