Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Economy grows 3.2%. So much for the shutdown affecting the economy.

Yep. Also imports down, exports up.

The Democrats can't possibly think they have an agenda that will make the economy any better. They will rely on a platform of class warfare , identity politics , " morality " , decency and similar perceived victim type narratives.

[Unregistered]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...0502064617.jpg

[Unregistered]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...0503063213.jpg

[Unregistered]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...0502094508.jpg

[Unregistered]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...0502073346.jpg

[Unregistered]

MSNBC Host To NYT Reporter On FBI Informant / Papadopoulos Story: "How Is This Not Spying?"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...ot_spying.html

[Unregistered]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...0503063213.jpg

Love this one!

[Unregistered]

Joe Biden's Surprising Early Strength
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...QoN/story.html

Obama-Era Spying Is Now a Political Risk for Biden
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...en_140226.html

[Unregistered]

Love this one!

My favorite.
https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/...0502064617.jpg

[Unregistered]

Yep. Also imports down, exports up.

The Democrats can't possibly think they have an agenda that will make the economy any better. They will rely on a platform of class warfare , identity politics , " morality " , decency and similar perceived victim type narratives.

It's like they are trying to self destruct.

What if I told you there’s an issue that unites a clear majority of Americans?

What if I told you that at least 60 percent of independents, Republicans, and Democrats agree on that issue?

And what if I told that the Democratic candidates for president are on the wrong side of that issue? That they’re out of step with the party – and the country – they want to lead?

That’s exactly the case with abortion.

With just nine months to go before the Iowa caucuses, Democratic hopefuls seem to be competing to embrace the most extreme position on abortion even though it alienates an overwhelming majority of Americans on both sides of the aisle. It is important to understand just how far Democratic candidates have strayed from public opinion – even among their own constituents.

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/st...es/3650748002/

[Unregistered]

What dopes the Dems are. They are threatening to hold Barr in contempt for not showing up yesterday. They can't hold him for contempt, because he volunteered to speak to the House. They would have had to have subpoenaed him in order to charge him with contempt.

Bahahahaha!

The House Judiciary Committee is threatening Barr with contempt for not providing the full unredacted Mueller report by the deadline that was specified.

Please provide evidence that Barr being threatened with contempt for failing to appear yesterday.

[Unregistered]

Democrats Have Created an “Electability” Monster
https://newrepublic.com/article/1537...bility-monster

Senator Kamala Harris was supposed to be a frontrunner. According to the rules of “the invisible primary,” in which donors and party activists coalesce around their chosen nominees, sending signals about candidate quality that primary voters, more often that not, eventually validate, Harris seemed to check all the boxes of a frontrunner.

In FiveThirtyEight’s weighted listing of endorsements, Harris ranked second among the declared candidates, losing out only to Senator Cory Booker (before Joe Biden formally entered the race last week). Judging by all available polling, though, Harris is not even close to the frontrunner. (And Cory Booker’s campaign seems to be utterly foundering. Most national polls put her in a distant third or fourth place, frequently trailing South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a relative neophyte who was polling at basically zero a month ago.

The new frontrunner, the former vice president, has, as you’d expect, even more institutional support behind him, especially among Democratic mega-donors and longtime elected officials. As the horserace quants at FiveThirtyEight explained, both are victims of the Democratic electorate’s fixation on “electability.” Polling broadly shows Democratic voters thinking Joe Biden has the best chance at winning the general election. That is exactly what Biden would like everyone to think, and that belief practically constitutes the sole argument for his candidacy.

Democratic candidates and their most loyal voters are stuck in an absurd feedback loop. The politicians campaign and govern as if they themselves don’t believe a majority of voters prefer their agenda, signaling to their most loyal voters that they must vote not for what they want, but for what they imagine their more-conservative neighbors might want. But when voters in 2016 did exactly that, and nominated the candidate they were repeatedly told was most qualified to defeat Trump in the general election, they chose a person who went on to lose to him.

https://newrepublic.com/article/1537...bility-monster

[Unregistered]

Beto O’Rourke Blew It
Reacting to losing to Ted Cruz by running for president is like failing to land a role in a community theater production and deciding to take your talents to Broadway.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/beto-o...ew-it?ref=home

[Unregistered]

Trump says he won’t let Don McGahn testify.
Lol. Good luck with that.

In other news...Mueller, who as far as we know is still a DOJ employee and as such would be expected to have his testimony before the House approved/arranged by the DOJ, is instead negotiating directly with the House Democrats about his testimony. That means Mueller doesn’t give a flying phuck about whatever Trump and Barr might do to try and stop him from testifying.

Good Times!

Sure is! McGahn will not be testifying under executive privilege and the courts will side with Trump on the matter because Trump had been so forthcoming during the investigation.

I suggest you read Emmet Flood's letter to the AG. It's all outlined there.

Oh and as far as Mueller is concerned. Did you forget Barr said his testifying is just fine by him? Which pretty much means he's not the least bit concerned by Mueller's testimony.

BTW did you know Mueller and Barr are such good friends they have attended the weddings of each others kids?

[Unregistered]

Anyone can testify as a private citizen, including McGahn, and in fact is required to so when requested. Trump can't stop that. Even if Mueller is still an employee of DOJ (unclear if he still is) Trump probably can't override a Congressional subpoena. That's not how the three branches of government work. Mueller could also just quit today and testify tomorrow.

Drea-ea-ea-ea-eam, dream, dream, dream
Drea-ea-ea-ea-eam, dream, dream, dream

Anytime night or day
Only trouble is, gee whiz
I'm dreamin' my life away

You have heard of the words executive privilege, right? And you know the Supreme Court has expressly recognized personal interactions and conversations with the president as protected by executive privilege.

http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/...srep418683.pdf

So why after testifying for 30 hours during the Mueller investigation do you think he'd want to testify to Congress after watching the clown show Barr just experienced, not to mention Kavanaugh last year?