Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

Abolish ICE ! Stop the Oppression ! Isn't that what Democrats are saying ? And Democrats have Sanctuary all set up for thugs like this . I didn't see this on CNN.







The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency joined the nationwide search for three men accused of kidnapping and raping two teen girls in Ohio, authorities said.


A fourth suspect has been arrested and charged in the alleged crime, police said Tuesday.

Bowling Green police are searching for David Ramos Contreras, 27, Juan Garcia Rios Adiel and Arnulfo Ramos. Police said Contreras is from Mexico. It is unclear where the others are from, though Adiel possesses a fraudulent permanent resident I.D. out of Florida, police said.




Adiel and Ramos are not believed to be U.S. citizens, according to WKRC-TV.

The fourth suspect, Simon Juan Thomas, 24, of Guatemala, was arrested and charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, police said. Thomas was booked into the Wood County Justice Center, according to the Dayton Daily News.

The incident occurred sometime around June 28 after the victims, 13- and 14-year-old sisters, were taken to a hospital telling medical workers they had been sexually assaulted and held captive at a Bowling Green motel, WTOL-TV reported. Police said the teens had escaped their captors

Police released photos of Contreras with two women exiting a Walmart in Holland on June 30. Police were seeking to identify the women.

Police were asking the public for help finding the three suspects.

The men were in the Bowling Green area working – two as dry wallers and one at Greenline Foods, according to WTOL-TV. They were reportedly staying in the motel, as were the girls with their mother.

[Unregistered]

#walkaway

[Unregistered]

You must be really afraid

Not at all. But some Democrats are according to Eugene Robinson.

[Unregistered]

Civil War! He's gonna break the party!!

Doh!


A longtime Democratic New York State lawmaker ripped Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), declaring that he will support the GOP until Schumer can "restore sanity and honesty" to the party.

State Assemblyman Dov Hikind of Brooklyn slammed Schumer's attacks on President Trump, which were sent as part of a fundraising call.

Hikind, who is not running for re-election, wrote on Facebook that Schumer, who is also from Brooklyn, "omitted vital information" about the economy, potential peace with North Korea and low unemployment.

"Senator Schumer, in your letter you promise to fight for Democratic values and go on at great length to fully villainize the current administration," Hikind wrote.

"You forgot to tell us about the economy. As good as it’s been, economists expect even more growth through the end of the year."


//////////////

Face it folks...those who only have an agenda to impeach Trump had better get their sh!t together and soon.

[Unregistered]

Latest Reuters/Ipso poll. Young white males favor Republicans to Democrats 46% to 37%.

No surprise says TMan (you know with is bigotry toward white males and all) except in 2016 it was just the reverse. Nearly 50% favored Democrats and only 36% favored the GOP.

It's going to be an interesting November.

[Unregistered]

Steve Schmidt, the veteran GOP strategist who worked in the George W. Bush White House and ran John McCain’s campaign for president, accused Republicans of complicity with the “vile” Trump administration and its “evil” policies unless they follow him and quit the party.

Schmidt announced Tuesday night that he had formally left the party over Trump’s policy of separating families at the U.S. border with Mexico.

Speaking to The Daily Beast, he called for his old boss, President Bush, to set aside political convention and come out to publicly challenge Trump’s grip on both the country and the Republican Party, which he feels is set to collapse. “This is a metastasis, a cancer, a toxin that has destroyed the Republican Party,” he said.


He said he fears that “cowards” Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell have failed in their constitutional duty to act as counterweights to the Executive Branch, opening up the possibility that an era of liberal American democracy could be coming to an end.

“The American people are fed a daily diet of nonsense-talk and lies in the form of what is effectively state media on Fox News and nobody should underestimate the threat posed by a political party where conservatism is now defined by absolute obedience to a leader with autocratic tendencies who fetishizes dictators and autocrats all over the world,” he said.


“Trump didn’t destroy the Republican Party—it’s the cowardice of the Republican leaders, their complicity in all of it, the lack of courage to stand up for what's right.

“Republican members of Congress are cowed and fearful of Trump and they have abrogated their oaths to defend the Constitution of the United States from Trump's attacks on the rule of law; on objective truth; his defilement of important institutions; his sundering of the American people; his betrayals of the Atlantic alliance; his racism; and his cruelty. The party has become profoundly corrupt, both financially in the form of men like Scott Pruitt and Jared [Kushner] and Ivanka [Trump], but also intellectually rotten and corrupt.”

Schmidt, who was campaign manager for Arnold Schwarzenegger’s re-election as governor of California, said he believes that the Republican Party has been so badly damaged by the Trump presidency that it will not be able to recover.

He fears the party’s virtual annihilation in California, where registration rolls now show fewer Republicans than unaffiliated voters and many races are fought between two Democrats, is a foreboding warning for it nationwide.

[Unregistered]

President Donald Trump’s upcoming meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin could have “catastrophic” consequences should the summit go as poorly as Trump’s recent sit-down with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, said Trump critic and longtime conservative commentator George Will on Wednesday.

Will, who famously left the Republican Party in June 2016 and encouraged voters to “make sure” Trump lost the election, cited a recent article about the president’s historic meeting with Kim in Singapore and how Trump accomplished little more than propping up the North Korean leader’s regime and potentially endangering the U.S.’s relationship with South Korea.

Both during the summit and in the subsequent weeks, Trump has showered Kim with praise, called the meeting a great success, and claimed the North is no longer a nuclear threat.

But Will asserted that Trump could be most dangerous when he “realizes how weak and childish” he comes off to major world leaders while Putin attempts to stoke disarray in Eastern Europe and Trump demeans NATO members.

“The most dangerous moment of the Trump presidency will arrive when he, who is constantly gnawed by insecurities and the fear of not seeming what he is not (‘strong’), realizes how weak and childish he seems to all who cast a cool eye on Singapore’s aftermath. The danger is of him lashing out in wounded vanity,” Will wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post.

Will also claims that Putin is dealing with a president who does not understand what NATO has “accomplished or any understanding of its revived importance.” And he noted that Putin “can sniff softness” and “relishes what Singapore revealed.”

Trump and Putin are expected to meet in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, after NATO leaders meet in Brussels. The pair reportedly will first meet one-on-one with only translators likely with them. This will be their third meeting since Trump took power 18 months ago.

Putin has long considered NATO, some of whose member nations have troops and armaments near Russia’s western borders, to be a threat to his country.

Trump, meanwhile, has received much criticism for not only praising Russia but also claiming that the country should be allowed back into the G-8 economic alliance. Russia was kicked out of the group in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, and its continued involvement in Ukraine has resulted in continued economic sanctions that have hindered Russia’s already limited economy.

Trump has also pushed back on the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russia, as directed by Putin, interfered in the 2016 election to prop up Trump’s candidacy. The president has said he believes Putin’s denials of any Russian involvement in the election.

[Unregistered]

The Senate Intelligence Committee has unequivocally upheld the conclusion of the intelligence community that Russia developed a "clear preference" for then-candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 election and sought to help him win the White House.

The assessment, announced in an unclassified summary released Tuesday, represents a direct repudiation of the committee's counterpart in the House - and of President Trump himself, who has consistently rejected assertions that Moscow sought to bolster his candidacy through its election interference.

"The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions," said Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said in a statement.

The so-called "intelligence community assessment," or ICA, is a "sound intelligence production," according the Senate panel.

"A body of reporting, to include different intelligence disciplines, open source reporting on Russian leadership policy preferences, and Russian media content, showed that Moscow sought to denigrate Secretary Clinton," the unclassified summary reads.

The ICA relied not only on public Russian leadership commentary and state media reports, but also "a body of intelligence reporting to support the assessment that Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for Trump," the committee found.

Senate investigators also rejected the notion that the ICA was inappropriately influenced by politics, as some of Trump's supporters have alleged.

The committee says it reviewed "thousands of pages of source documents" and interviewed all the relevant officials who were involved in developing the ICA, from agency heads and managers to line analysts-and "heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions."

A subtle difference in confidence between the NSA and the CIA and FBI on the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump's election chances "appropriately represents analytic differences and was reached in a professional and transparent manner," the Senate panel found.

In yet another contradiction to Trump allies claims, the Senate panel also found that a piece of Democratic-funded opposition research known as the Steele dossier did not "in any way inform the analysis in the ICA - including the key findings."

This was "because it was unverified information and had not been disseminated as serialized intelligence reporting," the Senate report found.

All in all, the Senate panel's report was a unflinching contradiction of many of the core claims made by Trump allies in the House.

The House Intelligence Committee in March released their report into 2016 election meddling, finding that the small group of intelligence officials who made the assessment in January 2017 did not meet the appropriate evidentiary standard to make that judgment with such certainty.

The House committee declined to make an assessment about whether the intelligence community's underlying claim - that Putin developed a clear preference for Trump - was correct, one of the GOP members leading that probe said at the time. What the panel has taken issue with, according to Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), is "how they came to it and the underlying documents they used."

The Senate committee is still in the process of preparing the classified report detailing its conclusions about the ICA, which when completed will go through a classification review with an eye towards making a version public.

The Senate panel's overall investigation into Russian election meddling is also still ongoing, with interim reports like this one released on a rolling basis.

[Unregistered]

Have to love British humor - they're going to fly a big baby Trump blimp over London when he is there.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...D=ansmsnnews11

[Unregistered]

More From the Unhinged Left

Kimberly Johnson, author and feminist, and also a racist

“Out on the road the other day I saw an affluent black man driving a BMW with two bumper-stickers. One was pro-NRA and the other one was a Tea Party sticker that read, ‘Don't tread on me,’” she wrote in a now-deleted tweet. “This left me very confused.”


Mo

[Unregistered]

Kimberly Johnson, author and feminist, and also a racist

“Out on the road the other day I saw an affluent black man driving a BMW with two bumper-stickers. One was pro-NRA and the other one was a Tea Party sticker that read, ‘Don't tread on me,’” she wrote in a now-deleted tweet. “This left me very confused.”


Mo

Same women:

“Stop explaining how women should behave or feel.”

[Unregistered]

The Senate Intelligence Committee has unequivocally upheld the conclusion of the intelligence community that Russia developed a "clear preference" for then-candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 election and sought to help him win the White House.

The assessment, announced in an unclassified summary released Tuesday, represents a direct repudiation of the committee's counterpart in the House - and of President Trump himself, who has consistently rejected assertions that Moscow sought to bolster his candidacy through its election interference.

"The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions," said Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said in a statement.

The so-called "intelligence community assessment," or ICA, is a "sound intelligence production," according the Senate panel.

"A body of reporting, to include different intelligence disciplines, open source reporting on Russian leadership policy preferences, and Russian media content, showed that Moscow sought to denigrate Secretary Clinton," the unclassified summary reads.

The ICA relied not only on public Russian leadership commentary and state media reports, but also "a body of intelligence reporting to support the assessment that Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for Trump," the committee found.

Senate investigators also rejected the notion that the ICA was inappropriately influenced by politics, as some of Trump's supporters have alleged.

The committee says it reviewed "thousands of pages of source documents" and interviewed all the relevant officials who were involved in developing the ICA, from agency heads and managers to line analysts-and "heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions."

A subtle difference in confidence between the NSA and the CIA and FBI on the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump's election chances "appropriately represents analytic differences and was reached in a professional and transparent manner," the Senate panel found.

In yet another contradiction to Trump allies claims, the Senate panel also found that a piece of Democratic-funded opposition research known as the Steele dossier did not "in any way inform the analysis in the ICA - including the key findings."

This was "because it was unverified information and had not been disseminated as serialized intelligence reporting," the Senate report found.

All in all, the Senate panel's report was a unflinching contradiction of many of the core claims made by Trump allies in the House.

The House Intelligence Committee in March released their report into 2016 election meddling, finding that the small group of intelligence officials who made the assessment in January 2017 did not meet the appropriate evidentiary standard to make that judgment with such certainty.

The House committee declined to make an assessment about whether the intelligence community's underlying claim - that Putin developed a clear preference for Trump - was correct, one of the GOP members leading that probe said at the time. What the panel has taken issue with, according to Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), is "how they came to it and the underlying documents they used."

The Senate committee is still in the process of preparing the classified report detailing its conclusions about the ICA, which when completed will go through a classification review with an eye towards making a version public.

The Senate panel's overall investigation into Russian election meddling is also still ongoing, with interim reports like this one released on a rolling basis.

Big deal Total nonsense. The Russians didn't write the US Constitution and the Electoral College.
No Russians were in the voting booths. No votes were altered or changed. No one was coerced, threatened or bullied to vote for Trump.

The downfall for the Democrats started much before the 2016 election. After 2010, all across America, Democrats lost on election after another, on just about all levels of Government. After the stunning victory in the 2016 election, they still can't come to grips that the messages that they think America should embrace , are constantly rejected.

So now they are leaning more to the left. Not all of them, but it is putting tremendous internal fighting in place. Right now they are the party of Resistance , Protest and Illegals. Their new " rising star " Socialist should forget about the national stage and concentrate on making her district better for its residents. There's a lot of work to do there.

[Unregistered]

Hi Bore-us,

It’s me. Been busy. Hosted some of my 🥜 ter red state relatives who vilify MA from their perch “down south”

Their conclusion after being in my world this week?

“Real Americans like us live here too.”

This is in town that voted 2-1 for HRC

Winning hearts and minds while you continue to foment here day after day ...

Good luck!

😉

[Unregistered]

Winning hearts and minds while you continue to foment here day after day ...

Good luck!

😉

Says the poster who far and away has the most posts from any single person on here. Same poster mysteriously "gets busy" whenever it gets hot; then pops in relentlessly when the slightest bit of news he likes appears.

[Unregistered]

Hi Bore-us,

It’s me. Been busy. Hosted some of my �� ter red state relatives who vilify MA from their perch “down south”

Their conclusion after being in my world this week?

“Real Americans like us live here too.”

This is in town that voted 2-1 for HRC

Winning hearts and minds while you continue to foment here day after day ...

Good luck!

��

You are not winning enough. We all know who is winning. Keep heading Left.