Oh I suppose Bore-us will be sneaking in after hours to muster whatever rehab of his crushed ego he can manage.
Two words
"Sealed indictments"
LOCK THEM ALL UP!!!!
Two words
"Sealed indictments"
LOCK THEM ALL UP!!!!
-
-
"There have been presidents with legal defense funds before.There haven't been billionaire presidents having party committees pay legal bills"
So next time "they" tell you trump isn't republican ask why the RNC is paying the legal bills of a not-Republucan.
Isn't Bore-us a silly, silly man (deep thought - do we know he isn't a boy, a woman , a person basically of ambiguous sex and age) for telling us trump isn't a republican.
It's like the DNC paying nixon's bills.Comment
-
Speaks for itself . What a corrupt party led by the most corrupt of allA Florida state senator who is running for governor said this week that he would punish Duke Energy for its slow response after Hurricane Irma by refusing their donations for one campaign cycle.Comment
-
Yeah, you know this Commie Plot has been going on for over 10 years. Has to be true, since Mueller is digging into Manafort's business dealings from that long ago. Who in their wildest dreams thought that the Russian " meddling" was a plot cooked up so long ago ? Putin must have really been pulling strings from the shadows to set it all up. Even though investigations were dropped for lack of evidence in the past, there must be dirt there. It follows the Progressive mindset of invent a crime, and then try and find evidence by any means possible.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Did you hear Bannon on " Russian meddling" ? Nothing there he says. Tell us, what IS THERE ? Facebook ads ? Trolls ?Comment
-
Bwahahaha!
Have you noticed TeeHeeMan that the mainstream media has been a bit quiet on the Manafort story instead of their usual hyperventilation? Haven't you wondered why?
From the WaPo no less: "When news broke last month that Mueller was using a grand jury to conduct his investigation, many reported it with unnecessary breathlessness. Although a grand jury investigation is certainly significant, a prosecutor does not need court approval or a finding of probable cause to issue a grand jury subpoena, and Mueller’s use of a grand jury was not unexpected.
A FISA warrant is another matter. It means investigators have demonstrated probable cause to an independent judicial authority. Obtaining a warrant actually says much more about the strength of the underlying allegations than issuing a grand jury subpoena.
That’s also why the search warrant executed at Manafort’s home in July was such a significant step in the investigation. Unlike a grand jury subpoena, the search warrant required Mueller’s team to demonstrate to a judge that a crime probably had been committed.
But it’s important not to get too far in front of the story. The FBI surveillance of Manafort reportedly began in 2014, long before he was working as Trump’s campaign manager. So the initial allegations, at least, appear to have involved potential crimes having nothing to do with the Trump campaign. And most or all of the surveillance apparently took place before Mueller was even appointed and was not at his direction."
What have we learned from all this, TeeHeeMan? That the the Obama administration did indeed wiretap Trump. Maybe not directly, but Manafort did have an apartment in Trump Tower and Trump did say the tower had been wiretapped. And the liberal MSM poo poo'd it all as Trump's delusion. Guess not. MSM takes another credibility dive on this one.
And let's not forget what the original CNN report said: "A secret order authorized by the court that handles the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) began after Manafort became the subject of an FBI investigation that began in 2014. It centered on work done by a group of Washington consulting firms for Ukraine's former ruling party, the sources told CNN.
The surveillance was discontinued at some point last year for lack of evidence, according to one of the sources.
The FBI then restarted the surveillance after obtaining a new FISA warrant that extended at least into early this year.
Sources say the second warrant was part of the FBI's efforts to investigate ties between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives. Such warrants require the approval of top Justice Department and FBI officials, and the FBI must provide the court with information showing suspicion that the subject of the warrant may be acting as an agent of a foreign power."
Bwahahaha! Top DOJ and FBI officials??? You mean like Loretta (I was just talking to Bill about golf and grandchildren) ***** and James Comey the same guy who said "There's no wiretapping of Trump".Comment
-
Also let's not forget what Clapper said.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
" For the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign," Clapper said on NBC in MarchComment
-
Now let's take a walk done memory lane to January of this year when this piece appeared in Politico.
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.
....Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race.
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.
But it doesn't stop there. Who was this "Ukrainian-American operative". Why none other than Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration and worked as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. No bias there, right TeeHeeMan?
And the story Chalupa tells are contradicted by others including her go to guy/gal, top aide to Ukraine’s ambassador to the U.S., Oksana Shulyar. According to Politico "Shulyar vehemently denied working with reporters or with Chalupa on anything related to Trump or Manafort" , but "Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.
...Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”
Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”
Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico."
Just a fascinating read including the existence of "ledgers" that resulted in Manafort resigning from Trump's campaign that may have been forged according to Politico. Sorta like the golden shower dossier.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...ackfire-233446Comment
-
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Remember When James Clapper Categorically Denied Any Wiretap Against Trump Campaign?
https://www.mediaite.com/columnists/...rump-campaign/
TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know?
CLAPPER: Yes.
TODD: You would be told this?
CLAPPER: I would know that.
TODD: If there was a FISA court order–
CLAPPER: Yes.
TODD: –on something like this.
CLAPPER: Something like this, absolutely.
TODD: And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists?
CLAPPER: I can deny it.Comment
-
Poor nutter is totally dazed and confused. Reposts damning information about the person Trump selected as his campaign manager and somehow thinks it's.... good news??
LolComment
-
Seems plausible ....PROVE it isn't? Can't can you?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Sorry. You seem soooo desperateComment
-
"Patronizing Assurances That No One Was Spying On Political Campaigns Were False, Probably Intentionally So"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...ere_false.htmlComment
-
Perhaps one has to do what one has to do to catch TRAITORS in the act?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Funny....no one wants to talk about the obvious coordination. So the hysteria and fingerprints ting starts as a distraction.
Is there a 🥜 ter who will answer this?
How did Russians manage to organize anti-immigrant rallies through trump cAmpaigns official browArd county FB page .....
The avalanche of data like this has begun .
We see you TRAITORSComment
-
" desperate " ?Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Not at all. More and more it appears that the " deep state " , imbedded during 8 years of Obama . was hell bent on preventing a candidate from winning, and then attempting a " coup " when surprised that he won. All the times spying on Journalists, politicians, citizens , and maybe even the POTUS. History may be made if it is proven that a Current POTUS is being compromised by his own Intelligence Agencies.Comment
-
Nah TeeHeeMan, I have no idea if Manafort has or has not done anything illegal. And neither do you. What I do know is the media today has no credibility whatsoever. If they did, that Politico article would have been front page news for weeks if not months. They report what supports the narrative and the narrative is Democrats are good, Republicans are bad. You know what though, TeeHeeMan? The MSM is pretty much being ignored these days.Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
"Both FBI and NSD confirm that they have no records related to wiretaps as described by the March 4, 2017 tweets," the government said, referring to the Justice Department’s National Security Division.
James Comey, who was FBI director at the time Trump made the statements, also said, in sworn testimony before Congress, that neither the FBI nor the Justice Department had information to support the tweets."
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...vidence-242284
Bwahahaha!Comment
-
Bwahahaha!Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
You whacks on the left call Trump a liar and then you make excuses when government officials lie to your face.
You can't make this stuff up.
Bwahahaha!Comment
Comment