Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an

[Unregistered]

In the meantime on the other side of the playground...Larry is getting an atomic wedgie from all the other boys.

Boris decompensating and turning into a 3 yr old ....just like POTUS

[Unregistered]

Sorry, buddy, Kim DotCom literally just release this statement.

KIm Dotcom?

Proceed guvnor

[Unregistered]

Boris decompensating and turning into a 3 yr old ....just like POTUS

It's true! POTUS is upset that his girl wouldn't hold her hand. he was really really upset in afternoon snack, somuch that he moved his chair all the way to the other side of the table. his girl tried to apologize and said she was she was only giving him five but we all saw it and know what it was

now everybody is talking about it all day. all the kids bring it up and nobody is letting it drop. it's hard to learn in class now and think about really important things because everyone is taking sides. i keep telling them so what if it's just handholding, it's not like he grabbed her puzzy or something...right?

[Unregistered]

i dont think it was giving five i think he pushed it away. thats the way I heard it from someone in the girls room they were talking while i was going pee in the stall and they said they saw and know what it was. i didn't see it myself but i know those voice or at least i think i know those voice and they would never lie

so i believe them

who wants ice cream? i want two scoops today i was very good in phonics.

[Unregistered]

Let's bump this as the Russian dog will never explain why there was a new cover story from WH every few hours.

Smoking guns all over the place


Drip drip drip

Every day will get worse for the nutters from here on out

You really need an explanation, TeeHeeMan? Really??? You are a naive moron, are you not?

The following was written by Robert Parry who broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s.

I realize that many Democrats, liberals and progressives hate Donald Trump so much that they believe that any pretext is justified in taking him down, even if that plays into the hands of the neoconservatives and other warmongers. Many people who detest Trump view Russia-gate as the most likely path to achieve Trump’s impeachment, so this desirable end justifies whatever means.

Some people have told me that they even believe that it is the responsibility of the major news media, the law enforcement and intelligence communities, and members of Congress to engage in a “soft coup” against Trump – also known as a “constitutional coup” or “deep state coup” – for the “good of the country.”

The argument is that it sometimes falls to these Establishment institutions to “correct” a mistake made by the American voters, in this case, the election of a largely unqualified individual as U.S. president. It is even viewed by some anti-Trump activists as a responsibility of “responsible” journalists, government officials and others to play this “guardian” role, to not simply “resist” Trump but to remove him.

There are obvious counter-arguments to this view, particularly that it makes something of a sham of American democracy. It also imposes on journalists a need to violate the ethical responsibility to provide objective reporting, not taking sides in political disputes.

But The New York Times and The Washington Post, in particular, have made it clear that they view Trump as a clear and present danger to the American system and thus have cast aside any pretense of neutrality.

The Times justifies its open hostility to the President as part of its duty to protect “the truth”; the Post has adopted a slogan aimed at Trump, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” In other words, America’s two most influential political newspapers are effectively pushing for a “soft coup” under the guise of defending “democracy” and “truth.”

But the obvious problem with a “soft coup” is that America’s democratic process, as imperfect as it has been and still is, has held this diverse country together since 1788 with the notable exception of the Civil War.

If Americans believe that the Washington elites are removing an elected president – even one as buffoonish as Donald Trump – it could tear apart the fabric of national unity, which is already under extraordinary stress from intense partisanship. That means that the “soft coup” would have to be carried out under the guise of a serious investigation....."

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/05/1...f-russia-gate/

[Unregistered]

You really need an explanation, TeeHeeMan? Really??? You are a naive moron, are you not?

The following was written by Robert Parry who broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s.

I realize that many Democrats, liberals and progressives hate Donald Trump so much that they believe that any pretext is justified in taking him down, even if that plays into the hands of the neoconservatives and other warmongers. Many people who detest Trump view Russia-gate as the most likely path to achieve Trump’s impeachment, so this desirable end justifies whatever means.

Some people have told me that they even believe that it is the responsibility of the major news media, the law enforcement and intelligence communities, and members of Congress to engage in a “soft coup” against Trump – also known as a “constitutional coup” or “deep state coup” – for the “good of the country.”

The argument is that it sometimes falls to these Establishment institutions to “correct” a mistake made by the American voters, in this case, the election of a largely unqualified individual as U.S. president. It is even viewed by some anti-Trump activists as a responsibility of “responsible” journalists, government officials and others to play this “guardian” role, to not simply “resist” Trump but to remove him.

There are obvious counter-arguments to this view, particularly that it makes something of a sham of American democracy. It also imposes on journalists a need to violate the ethical responsibility to provide objective reporting, not taking sides in political disputes.

But The New York Times and The Washington Post, in particular, have made it clear that they view Trump as a clear and present danger to the American system and thus have cast aside any pretense of neutrality.

The Times justifies its open hostility to the President as part of its duty to protect “the truth”; the Post has adopted a slogan aimed at Trump, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” In other words, America’s two most influential political newspapers are effectively pushing for a “soft coup” under the guise of defending “democracy” and “truth.”

But the obvious problem with a “soft coup” is that America’s democratic process, as imperfect as it has been and still is, has held this diverse country together since 1788 with the notable exception of the Civil War.

If Americans believe that the Washington elites are removing an elected president – even one as buffoonish as Donald Trump – it could tear apart the fabric of national unity, which is already under extraordinary stress from intense partisanship. That means that the “soft coup” would have to be carried out under the guise of a serious investigation....."

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/05/1...f-russia-gate/

What a Moron!

Russians love consortium news say "da" Ivan

http://russia-insider.com/en/robert_...onsortium_news

Check the link folks the Russians love mirroring Ivan's sources

Your as big a bumbler as trump Ivan


Hahahajahahahahahahaha

[Unregistered]

What a Moron!

Russians love consortium news say "da" Ivan

http://russia-insider.com/en/robert_...onsortium_news

Check the link folks the Russians love mirroring Ivan's sources

Your as big a bumbler as trump Ivan


Hahahajahahahahahahaha

You shouldn't be calling people names. my mom told me thats not nice and that if you can't say something nice you shouldn't say anything at all. besides who made you the know it all?

[Unregistered]

And as far as nutter denials about melani and the hand holding ....

The world is laughing and trump is nothing but a narcissist . We KNOW how it makes him feel. We do it for that...not YOUR reaction

Hahahahahahahahaha

It gets to the loser for sure. Maybe next time he'll hand her a map of his electoral college win

Hahahahahabahahahahahahahahaha

You maybe right about the narcissism. After all, it takes one to know one and we all know that is one of the attributes of the TeeHeeMan. But the same can be said for Trump's predecessor. Regardless the big difference is that Trump has regained in 4 months in office respect for the USA in the Middle East that Obama lost in his 8 years in office. That must kill you and the other Obama devotees out there, eh TeeHeeMan?

[Unregistered]

Wow. Too low for fox but not Ivan

Fox News on Tuesday removed a story based on an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory about the unsolved murder of a DNC staffer.

“The article was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all our reporting,” Fox said in a brief statement. “Upon appropriate review, the article was found not to meet those standards and has since been removed.”

Rough ride again today Ivan da?

[Unregistered]

You maybe right about the narcissism. After all, it takes one to know one and we all know that is one of the attributes of the TeeHeeMan. But the same can be said for Trump's predecessor. Regardless the big difference is that Trump has regained in 4 months in office respect for the USA in the Middle East that Obama lost in his 8 years in office. That must kill you and the other Obama devotees out there, eh TeeHeeMan?

Oh that was such a weak butt hurt response but given that I told you this would happen with GOP governance you must be feeling like a HUMILIATEd cuckservative right now.

Let's pick up tomorrow. Take rest of day off and regroup boris

[Unregistered]

You shouldn't be calling people names. my mom told me thats not nice and that if you can't say something nice you shouldn't say anything at all. besides who made you the know it all?

You used the word "moron" in post I was replying to

So you must be referring to "bumbler"

What a weak butt hurt little cuck. Things aren't going his way so last refuge will now be playing victim

[Unregistered]

Nope. All this will get worse for is the Dems and the MSM.

The smoking guns are being loaded by the 24/7 MSM media , that can't let go of the story, because if they do, there isn't a story.

New York Times and even the Washington Compost backpedalling on impeachment, because they really know what is at stake. More and more people turning the MSM off, and not listening .

I agree with you. Apparently TeeHeeMan just ignored the new Harris Poll since it was not to his liking. The Dem echo chamber tells him one thing, but that poll tells quite another.

[Unregistered]

Really?

Don't the facts show that trump is killing FOX? MSNBC #1 all of a sudden? Their growth too big to be undiscover d libs. Disaffected fox viewers

Keep spinning. Helps me savor the hurt you will increasingly feel

Trump is killing Fox??? How so?

MSNBC wins 1 week in prime time ratings and that makes them the leader?

If MSNBC can maintain that lead it's Trump's fault? It has nothing to do with the fact, O'Reilly, Van Susteren and Kelly are out of the prime time line up, not to mention the kingmaker, Roger Ailes is gone.

You libs really are delusional.

[Unregistered]

You used the word "moron" in post I was replying to

So you must be referring to "bumbler"

What a weak butt hurt little cuck. Things aren't going his way so last refuge will now be playing victim

i really dont think you should be using naughty words like that. i think we should all be friends and not send notes about others without them knowing. it hurts me everytime i hear these kids just making stuff so they can hurt someone

it's naughty and not nice

Santa is going to be mad at you.

[Unregistered]

The one FOX heard and STILL retracted story?

Gonna have to do better this time cockroach. Dogs don't hunt quite like they used to.

Try again.

The fact that Fox retracked their story has nothing to do with the Kim Dotcom revelation.

Here's the timeline on this story.

May 15 Fox 5 out of DC reports: "Family's private investigator: There is evidence Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks prior to death".

May 16 Fox News reports on the same story.

May 17 Rod Wheeler backtracks on his story in a CNN interview.

May 20 Kim Dotcom confirmed via Twitter that he was working with Seth Rich to get leaked emails to WikiLeaks. He also stated he was meeting his "legal team" would issue a statement on Tuesday. (Kim Dotcom's real name is Kim Schmitz. He is a German-Finnish Internet entrepreneur, businessman, musician, and political party founder who resides in Auckland, New Zealand.)

May 20 Someone edits Seth Rich's Reddit account.

May 23 Fox News retracts the article of May 16.

May23 Kim Dotcom tweets: "#SethRich was a hero#SethRich changed history#SethRich exposed the corrupt
Here is my statement > http://Kim.com
1:00 PM - 23 May 2017

That statement has already been posted, but here it is again.

I know that Seth Rich was involved in the DNC leak.

I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.

Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.

I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.

“He wanted to change that from the inside.”

I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.

The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.

I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.