Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Turkey fans BOO during pre-match minute's silence for the victims of Paris attacks an
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
-
Unregistered
Every day: one more reason to march
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
Traitor
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
or Two reasons... or three ... every minute another good reason to join the battle
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOn Saturday, the president and commander in chief of the United States stood in front of the C.I.A. Memorial Wall — where 117 stars honor the men and women who died in the line of service — and cracked jokes, made thinly veiled threats and disrespected many Americans.
Traitor
--- At least some of us pay taxes to cover the multibillion dollar Wall / Phantom Vote count
REason #3:
--- His lack of transparency indicates nerarious actions such as colluding with the russians, and all foreign governments currently contradicting the constitution of these GREAT United States.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
More bad news for TeeHeeMan and his cohorts.
Dark. Negative. Divisive. That's was the immediate narrative about President Donald Trump's inaugural address.
But many Americans liked it.
A new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll shows that the new president’s message is resonating with voters, refuting the idea that Trump bungled his first speech as commander in chief.
Trump got relatively high marks on his Friday address, with 49 percent of those who watched or heard about the speech saying it was excellent or good, and just 39 percent rating it as only fair or poor. Sixty-five percent of those surveyed reacted positively to the “America First” message, the cornerstone of the Trump campaign and governing posture.
Americans are looking for Trump to put his slogan into action: 61 percent said they agreed with Trump's plan that the federal government should "buy American and hire American.
Fifty-one percent of voters described the speech as 'optimistic,' 46 percent of respondents say the speech was 'presidential,' and 44 percent say it was 'inspiring"
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...address-234148
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
hey stoooopid
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOh dear. You seem to have forgotten already what the Jill Stein recount turned up in just one state, in just one city. There is voter fraud. It’s been documented. There were many more Democrat votes than there were Democrat voters! And that just might be why Democrats are sweating the Trump investigation.
Even Melania voted for Hillary. Fact.
Her message in the blue box says it all: "Take me with you."
or do you think ONLY registered Dems can vote for Hillary?
65,845,000 for Hillary
USA VOTERS: 55 million are registered Republicans . About 72 million registered Democrats.
About 42 million are registered as independents, under some other minor party or with a “No Party” designation.’
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCase in point: He now wants a nationwide search for 3 million phantom voters. Your taxpayer dollars at work.
--- At least some of us pay taxes to cover the multibillion dollar Wall / Phantom Vote count
REason #3:
--- His lack of transparency indicates nerarious actions such as colluding with the russians, and all foreign governments currently contradicting the constitution of these GREAT United States.
Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...61379414000973
Could non-citizens decide the November election?
October 24, 2014
Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.
In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post....You can't ALL be so stoopid.
Even Melania voted for Hillary. Fact.
Her message in the blue box says it all: "Take me with you."
or do you think ONLY registered Dems can vote for Hillary?
65,845,000 for Hillary
USA VOTERS: 55 million are registered Republicans . About 72 million registered Democrats.
About 42 million are registered as independents, under some other minor party or with a “No Party” designation.’
Stein cited election irregularities in Michigan as evidence of the need to re-examine the state’s election results ― and the need to change state laws that make those verification processes more difficult.
More than 10 percent of the voting precincts in the 22 Michigan counties that began the recount process, and about 60 percent of precincts in Detroit alone, could not complete the process because there was a discrepancy between the number of voters in the poll books and the number of ballots counted by the optical scanners.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b092f08685ff68
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
This is coming from a Democrat no less who of course will be made to pay the penalty. Not only did he suggest there was voter fraud, but he went on to say in occurred in minority neighborhoods. Off with his head!!!
Earlier this month, conservative nonprofit group Project Veritas leaked a clandestine recording of BOE Commissioner Alan Schulkin alleging that that organizations bus people around to cast ballots at multiple polling sites in minority neighborhoods, and that the Mayor Bill de Blasio’s IDNYC municipal identification program enables voter fraud. On Tuesday, a state investigative unit subpoenaed Schulkin, who has so far defied calls from de Blasio and other Democrats to resign his post.
http://observer.com/2016/10/nyc-boar...-fraud-claims/
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostI forgive you, because you are not very smart. Apparently you have no clue about how elections are rigged. I'm sure Russia and Wiki leaked in such a methodical, strategic manner because they weren't trying to rig the election. As for your claim, let's see some evidence. There is NONE, AND EVEN THE STAUNCHEST REPUBLICANS AGREE.
Nothing like a smug illiberal. You can depend on them to use arrogance to hide the fact their arguments lacks any validity.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostThis is coming from a Democrat no less who of course will be made to pay the penalty. Not only did he suggest there was voter fraud, but he went on to say in occurred in minority neighborhoods. Off with his head!!!
Earlier this month, conservative nonprofit group Project Veritas leaked a clandestine recording of BOE Commissioner Alan Schulkin alleging that that organizations bus people around to cast ballots at multiple polling sites in minority neighborhoods, and that the Mayor Bill de Blasio’s IDNYC municipal identification program enables voter fraud. On Tuesday, a state investigative unit subpoenaed Schulkin, who has so far defied calls from de Blasio and other Democrats to resign his post.
http://observer.com/2016/10/nyc-boar...-fraud-claims/
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
stooopid; again
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostMore bad news for TeeHeeMan and his cohorts.
Dark. Negative. Divisive. That's was the immediate narrative about President Donald Trump's inaugural address.
But the few unAmericans who could stomach it liked it.
A new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll shows that the new president’s message is resonating with the few unAmericans who could stomach it, refuting the idea that Trump bungled his first speech as commander in chief to the few unAmericans who could stomach it
Trump got relatively high marks on his Friday address, with 49 percent of the few unAmericans who could stomach it saying it was excellent or good, and just 39 percent rating it as only fair or poor. Sixty-five percent of those surveyed reacted positively to the “America First” message, the cornerstone of the Trump campaign and governing posture.
Americans are looking for Trump to put his slogan into action: 61 percent said they agreed with Trump's plan that the federal government should "buy American and hire American.
Fifty-one percent of voters described the speech as 'optimistic,' 46 percent of respondents say the speech was 'presidential,' and 44 percent say it was 'inspiring"
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...address-234148
none of the rest of us could listen to this unAMerican nefarious insulting narcissist....
so yeah.... corrected it for ya ... 49% of your losing voters.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostSweating the Trump investigation? Are you kidding? He got trapped when his press secretary couldn't defend him because even top ranking republicans have said there is no voter fraud on any scale that Trump claims. Why would Dems care? Trump won. Now if we find out there is a smoking gun with Trump and Russia then that's different ballgame.
Just curious, what news outlets do you follow, lol?
Dems don't care??? Then why are they throwing a hissy fit over the investigation?
Dems should care. It would put this thing to bed once and for all. It's the perfect opportunity for Dems to prove Trump is lying.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostOn Saturday, the president and commander in chief of the United States stood in front of the C.I.A. Memorial Wall — where 117 stars honor the men and women who died in the line of service — and cracked jokes, made thinly veiled threats and disrespected many Americans.
Traitor
- Quote
Comment
Comment