The Revolution Academy needs to make some changes.

[Unregistered]

I stand by my "claims" because they are facts. They list where the players came from on their profiles. You should look a little more closely.

You do realize that the age change meant that 2005 got skipped for U12 DA so you are wrong that "where the players came from" is on their profiles. There are 2 Valeo players on the U14 roster, 3 GPS and 4 NEFC alongside players from Bolts, Seacoast, etc... Again, only one of the things that you said was an actual fact. You cherry picked the year that best made the case for whatever axe you are grinding, then fell back to a year that you apparently don't know much about.

More importantly, who cares? Different clubs are stronger or weaker in different years.

You are actually almost right about one thing. The U15 age group will likely continue to have an influx of NEFC players as they age out of NEFCs U12-U14 academy and merge into Bolts/Revs teams, although many of those players will merge into NEFC U13 from other clubs. Again, who cares?

[Unregistered]

And the Revs will still suck

[Unregistered]

Check the 13's, all Valeo and Bayside kids. Only one GPS & one NEFC, I believe...

Makes sense. They wash out all the Valeo and Bayside kids as they age through the program.

[Unregistered]

Saw the names, we all know them by now. Not the best in the region. They'll suck again. The two 2001 Bolts additions to the Revs U19 team are nothing special either. Sad state of affairs in Foxboro.

I think you're correct, some of the top 2002 and 2003's are playing for Belmont Hill, Nobles, Milton and Middlesex. The Revs DO NOT have the top players assembled.

[Unregistered]

Makes sense. They wash out all the Valeo and Bayside kids as they age through the program.

There are no NEFC players left from the 2003 age group.

[Unregistered]

There are no NEFC players left from the 2003 age group.

That’s funny because in CB’s presentation to the NEFC U12 age group he lists 6 players from that age group have gone onto the Revs. I guess he needs to update his presentation.

[Unregistered]

That’s funny because in CB’s presentation to the NEFC U12 age group he lists 6 players from that age group have gone onto the Revs. I guess he needs to update his presentation.

yes, christian needs to update the presentation. most went back to nefc

[Unregistered]

yes, christian needs to update the presentation. most got cut and went back to nefc

Fixed it for you.

[Unregistered]

Fixed it for you.

Poor talent selection is a perennial problem with the Revs. Thanks for reminding everyone.

[Unregistered]

I think you're correct, some of the top 2002 and 2003's are playing for Belmont Hill, Nobles, Milton and Middlesex. The Revs DO NOT have the top players assembled.

Can you smell that? It smells like Bolt waivers.

[Unregistered]

Poor talent selection is a perennial problem with the Revs. Thanks for reminding everyone.

That's what you get for partnering with NEFC.

[Unregistered]

That's what you get for partnering with NEFC.

If they weren't so lazy they'd partner with a dozen clubs and get scouts onto fields.

[Unregistered]

Fixed it for you.

You didn’t fix anything for me. Read the question before my response.

[Unregistered]

If they weren't so lazy they'd partner with a dozen clubs and get scouts onto fields.

If the USSF doesn't even know how to scout for the NTs, how do you expect the Revs "scouts" to know what to look for in a player?

[Unregistered]

Can you smell that? It smells like Bolt waivers.

Waivers are a win-win, especially for the top players. Revs haven't recognized this aspect.