Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ECNL wants to switch back to school year from birth year

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Guest View Post

    So my June '07 child who's a freshman currently will have to play with juniors next year?
    So she will miss Sophomore year showcases?

    ​​​​​​Okay so let's say she attends showcases next year with the team of juniors and a scout is interested in her, they can't technically contact her because she's actually still a sophomore. Correct?
    What? She'll be a sophomore so she'll play with sophomores with her graduation year. What's so hard to understand?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Guest View Post

      What? She'll be a sophomore so she'll play with sophomores with her graduation year. What's so hard to understand?
      According to the new rule June '09 players should be on a team with juniors next year. No?

      (She was held back)

      Comment


        Originally posted by Guest View Post

        So my June '09 child who's a freshman currently will have to play with juniors next year?
        So she will miss Sophomore year showcases?

        ​​​​​​Okay so let's say she attends showcases next year with the team of juniors and a scout is interested in her, they can't technically contact her because she's actually still a sophomore. Correct?
        Your June 09 is playing now with sophomores/next year juniors. Things would be unchanged for her

        Comment


          Originally posted by Guest View Post

          Reading your post is as gross as watching you **********.
          Not OP but as a centrist, you have to realize the left went to far on DEI where it created inequity and angst among a very large section of under educated Americans. This lost the election and put our country’s future in the hands of con artists. If we never see DEI again, it will be good for America. It’s just too easy to create campaign talking points that capture the public’s attention and avoid focusing on the real policies which most Americans do not support.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Guest View Post

            Nope! Your math is off by a year. Most kids start kindergarten when they are 5, not 6. But it's OK, and certainly legal to start at 6 as you are also stating. A July kid starting kindergarten at 6 years 1 month will be one of the older kids in their grade, but under 8/1 soccer cut off would have to play with mostly kids one grade higher.

            To be explicit, the legal range to start kindergarten is between 5 year 0-1 month to 6 years 8-9 months, much wider than some would have you believe.
            You two are mostly arguing the same point. Above you talk about kindergarten. The other poster notes the law establishing the date by which to start school. That law applies to 1st grade since kindergarten is not mandatory in MA. So both arguments end up with mainly 6 year olds in first grade.

            However, your argument above of starting kindergarten at 6 years 9 months is inaccurate. That child would start 1st grade at that age. There is not a nearly 2 year age variance within a given grade unless a child was held back for a valid reason.

            To complicate things further, the start dates for kindergarten are not consistent from town to town.

            https://www.doe.mass.edu/sfs/earlyle...ces/entry.aspx

            Comment


              Originally posted by Guest View Post

              According to the new rule June '09 players should be on a team with juniors next year. No?

              (She was held back)
              next years typical Juniors will be Sept 1 2008 to Aug 31 2009.
              At June 2009 birthday, your child should be with that group. If she was held back, it will all depend on how the rule is written. If it only shifts birthdates then she will play with the Juniors. If it is written as grad year she will play with the 2028 class which is mainly Sept 1 2009 to Aug 31 2010.

              From what I hear, there is a lot of push back on including the reclassed kids in grad year and your child will likely be playing with the juniors.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Guest View Post
                next years typical Juniors will be Sept 1 2008 to Aug 31 2009.
                At June 2009 birthday, your child should be with that group. If she was held back, it will all depend on how the rule is written. If it only shifts birthdates then she will play with the Juniors. If it is written as grad year she will play with the 2028 class which is mainly Sept 1 2009 to Aug 31 2010.

                From what I hear, there is a lot of push back on including the reclassed kids in grad year and your child will likely be playing with the juniors.
                Thank you.
                I'm confident she will hold her own against them as she does already.
                My worry is that scouts can't contact her like they can the rest of the team because she's still a sophomore in high school.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Guest View Post

                  You two are mostly arguing the same point. Above you talk about kindergarten. The other poster notes the law establishing the date by which to start school. That law applies to 1st grade since kindergarten is not mandatory in MA. So both arguments end up with mainly 6 year olds in first grade.

                  However, your argument above of starting kindergarten at 6 years 9 months is inaccurate. That child would start 1st grade at that age. There is not a nearly 2 year age variance within a given grade unless a child was held back for a valid reason.

                  To complicate things further, the start dates for kindergarten are not consistent from town to town.

                  https://www.doe.mass.edu/sfs/earlyle...ces/entry.aspx
                  It says that the child needs to be in school the year they turn six. Doesn't say anything about first grade. Is kindergarten not school? Then why does it say minimum school age for kindergarten?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Guest View Post

                    It says that the child needs to be in school the year they turn six. Doesn't say anything about first grade. Is kindergarten not school? Then why does it say minimum school age for kindergarten?
                    In your experience, do you regularly have a 2 year age range in your kids classes? Regularly? Not little Jimmy who was started late
                    because he couldn’t stop wetting his pants. Not a missed a year of school because of Covid related hold back. Regularly? I have 4 kids and have only seen the rare case when a kid is held back and never at the wide end of your age range. 2 kids among all 4 of my kids classes. 1 held back because he missed the age cut off by 1 month and his parents thought he was immature for his age. And one who reclassed in 7th grade because of maturity/emotional issues.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Guest View Post

                      Another way to think about it is that most Jan-Aug parents choose an extra year of free childcare and send their children to kindergarten when they are 5, even though it's not mandatory that year. That's a choice made under free will, so why should kids that started kindergarten at 6 (again, VERY legal) be punished for not making that choice? It's not like some loophole was exploited, it's just most people generally like free child care so they ship their kids off to school as early as possible, which is not necessarily the best option for the kids.
                      Exactly. The guy who can't count to 6 or understand the use of "calendar year" in the regulation and keeps claiming it's a maximum age cutoff is gunning for King of the Stoopids on TS.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Guest View Post

                        In your experience, do you regularly have a 2 year age range in your kids classes? Regularly? Not little Jimmy who was started late
                        because he couldn’t stop wetting his pants. Not a missed a year of school because of Covid related hold back. Regularly? I have 4 kids and have only seen the rare case when a kid is held back and never at the wide end of your age range. 2 kids among all 4 of my kids classes. 1 held back because he missed the age cut off by 1 month and his parents thought he was immature for his age. And one who reclassed in 7th grade because of maturity/emotional issues.
                        In practice I rarely see Jan-May starting kindergarten at 6. Summer kids (Jun-Aug) are about half/half. The younger the age group (2017) the more prevalent later starts. Maybe COVID convinced people there is no rush to start too early. Only New York wants 4-year olds in

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Guest View Post

                          Exactly. The guy who can't count to 6 or understand the use of "calendar year" in the regulation and keeps claiming it's a maximum age cutoff is gunning for King of the Stoopids on TS.
                          Starting kindergarten at 6 and then turning 7 during their kindergarten year is not the norm. It would end up with high school seniors turning 19 during their senior year. This is not the norm. Most people end high school as 18 year olds.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Guest View Post

                            Starting kindergarten at 6 and then turning 7 during their kindergarten year is not the norm. It would end up with high school seniors turning 19 during their senior year. This is not the norm. Most people end high school as 18 year olds.
                            It's not the norm, but it's not mandated, either. If there's a cut off max date it would have to be 12/31 of prior year. But the main point is that there is no max cut off date in the summer and those kids can start kindergarten at 6 and graduate as 18 years old.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Guest View Post

                              It's not the norm, but it's not mandated, either. If there's a cut off max date it would have to be 12/31 of prior year. But the main point is that there is no max cut off date in the summer and those kids can start kindergarten at 6 and graduate as 18 years old.
                              A mandate isn’t important if 98% of kids fall into a scenario. That scenario is how the proposals were built. You are one of the few in this scenario nationwide. I don’t know how you got there, but it’s unnatural.

                              Comment


                                IF this change happens, any word on when it would be implemented? Fall 2025?

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X