Originally posted by Unregistered
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Merry Christmas from Donald Trump
Collapse
X
-
Unregistered
- Quote
-
Unregistered
They are patriots, who have served their nation well, and put their love of nation ahead of politics or personal enrichment.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNope. They are partisan actors. They are assets to the MSM, and the left. They are not assets to this administration. Stop the BS.
You all can't stand it when lifelong Republicans call Trump out. You know his administration stinks to high heaven but you just keep plugging your nose.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostNo, CBO definitely discussed QE in their reporting.
The stimulus acted quicker (it's intention) and much credit was given to QE, who's effects on intetest rates are still felt today. Read the CBO reports, they are very comprehensive, and apolitical.
That's the problem with the stimulus. Repubs were deslerate for Obama to not get credit or be successful in combating a horrible economic debacle.
Again, party over country.
Page 2: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...49958-ARRA.pdf
The stimulus did squat.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostElections have consequences....
Who said that? Why do people who are selling books and are media talking heads need security clearances?
Why do Jared and Ivanka get clearances?. They have ZERO relevant experience and profit from ther roles while in ofdice. Those others were highly qualified and served our country at crappie government salaries. Many work for defense contractors and security firms that work closely with the US Government and military. It's Toddler Trump pettiness pure and simple.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostLike the Parkland kids and Newtown parents were actors?
You all can't stand it when lifelong Republicans call Trump out. You know his administration stinks to high heaven but you just keep plugging your nose.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostBy that logic than all the former congressional members shouldn't get to benefit from their years of governemnt sercice. That will kill the libby industry though so it might not be a bad thing.
Why do Jared and Ivanka get clearances?. They have ZERO relevant experience and profit from ther roles while in ofdice. Those others were highly qualified and served our country at crappie government salaries. Many work for defense contractors and security firms that work closely with the US Government and military. It's Toddler Trump pettiness pure and simple.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCome on Snowflakes. You should read your own reports you site. Sorry but $114 billion of government spending in 2009 does not create 3.3 million jobs. And the $114 billion was spend as follows: Medicare ($32B), unemployment compensation ($28B), education ($12B), Social security ($13B). Only a Snowflake would believe you can create jobs by giving out unemployment compensation and increasing entitlements. Please!
Page 2: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...49958-ARRA.pdf
The stimulus did squat.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostStill waiting for why ANY former employee should have security clearance? And no I don’t really care if former congressional members can’t profit off of the system. I will sleep very well.
You also didn't answer why Javanka are entitled to clearances when they've done nothing in their jobs, but have made $82M while in office. Ivanka brands were exempted from Chinese tariffs too when other companies were not.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostCome on Snowflakes. You should read your own reports you site. Sorry but $114 billion of government spending in 2009 does not create 3.3 million jobs. And the $114 billion was spend as follows: Medicare ($32B), unemployment compensation ($28B), education ($12B), Social security ($13B). Only a Snowflake would believe you can create jobs by giving out unemployment compensation and increasing entitlements. Please!
Page 2: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...49958-ARRA.pdf
The stimulus did squat.
The unemployment payments and social safety net payments ("entitlements"), are generally considered the fastest way to get money into the system and have ymto roll/multiply ("velocity").
And finally, the outlays are not representative of the tax cuts. Those are not "money out". So dont distegard them in your outlay analysis.
Lool, l lived the financial crisis. A bond trader for 30 years, I didn't sleep for two years navigating that thing.
The stimulus worked. I'm the end the tools used worked.
We are here today, because of it. I'm not a Democrat, and you are not close to an economist. Good luck to you.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
And the bigger picture in the Great recession was the role of government, how much government should intrude into markets and the private sector, and whether government is even necessary (in many right vs left debates). I'm telling you if the concerted actions of many branches if government (executive, fdic, fed, treasury, etc ) did not uccur, it would have been another great depression. Im sorry, thats just not debatable.
- Quote
Comment
-
Unregistered
Originally posted by Unregistered View PostAs you well know, most of the Republican establishment and all of the Democratic establishment is anti Trump. Get real. He has disrupted the status quo. It is precisely why he was elected.
- Quote
Comment
Comment