Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

[Unregistered]

Can we agree that supporting Trump does not automatically make you a racist? If so, can we not also agree that supporting the Democrats does not automatically make one a socialist or in favor of open borders and other silly generalizations? Wouldn't it just be better if people didn't label and pigeon hole folks so quickly? Do you think sound discussion might blossom a bit more?

Regardless of how you feel about the Mueller report and the investigations, even if politically motivated, should we tolerate the President of the United States failing his oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States"? Is not the Constitution and the law contained within it more important than his ignoring Congressional subpoenas? Should he not just comply with the law and prove them all wrong and superficial as he claims they are? Should he not rise above his compulsion to insult those around him? Should we not expect the President to be the best of ourselves as a people?

no

calling someone a racist - impugns their whole being. Racism being a core belief

socialism and open borders are policies that you support or dont- you can change your mind on policy can you if you are a racist? dems call reps racist with no proof but dont like the socialist label when every 2020 dem is running on iit

The constitution is the most important thing- it limits what the Govt can do to the individual- so Trump standing up to the Bureaucrats is fine with me
go to court and see who is abusing their power thats all part of how our judicial system works

Dems just want the soap opera- this is all BS and that is an abuse against the AMERICAN people

[Unregistered]

no

calling someone a racist - impugns their whole being. Racism being a core belief

socialism and open borders are policies that you support or dont- you can change your mind on policy can you if you are a racist? dems call reps racist with no proof but dont like the socialist label when every 2020 dem is running on iit

The constitution is the most important thing- it limits what the Govt can do to the individual- so Trump standing up to the Bureaucrats is fine with me
go to court and see who is abusing their power thats all part of how our judicial system works

Dems just want the soap opera- this is all BS and that is an abuse against the AMERICAN people

Way too funny....

note any lack of self criticism from this right-wing bigot

tRUMP obstructing justice by opposing and /or ignoring subpoenas from Congress is "standing up to the Bureaucrats" ... time to Dump tRUMP ... or lock him up

[Unregistered]

Way too funny....

note any lack of self criticism from this right-wing bigot

tRUMP obstructing justice by opposing and /or ignoring subpoenas from Congress is "standing up to the Bureaucrats" ... time to Dump tRUMP ... or lock him up

the justice dept is in the executive branch-Trump didnt ignore their subpoenas
as i said- congress has means to get what they need and Trump can push back legally if he chooses-thats not obstruction thats due process
then it goes to the 3rd branch for a decision
disagreeing is not obstruction- destroying evidence is
the Barr thing wont ever go to court- Nads would lose as soon as the case was handed to the judge- this is all eye wash for you and the rest of the Trump haters. it surely is winning over any new voters and the indies were satisfied with the mueller findings

[Unregistered]

Can we agree that supporting Trump does not automatically make you a racist? If so, can we not also agree that supporting the Democrats does not automatically make one a socialist or in favor of open borders and other silly generalizations? Wouldn't it just be better if people didn't label and pigeon hole folks so quickly? Do you think sound discussion might blossom a bit more?

Regardless of how you feel about the Mueller report and the investigations, even if politically motivated, should we tolerate the President of the United States failing his oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States"? Is not the Constitution and the law contained within it more important than his ignoring Congressional subpoenas? Should he not just comply with the law and prove them all wrong and superficial as he claims they are? Should he not rise above his compulsion to insult those around him? Should we not expect the President to be the best of ourselves as a people?

Ok...but let’s start with this. Why do democrats think seeing trump’s tax return is important? I personally think all candidates should be required to, however, it isn’t required and thus none of their business.

[Unregistered]

the justice dept is in the executive branch-Trump didnt ignore their subpoenas
as i said- congress has means to get what they need and Trump can push back legally if he chooses-thats not obstruction thats due process
then it goes to the 3rd branch for a decision
disagreeing is not obstruction- destroying evidence is
the Barr thing wont ever go to court- Nads would lose as soon as the case was handed to the judge- this is all eye wash for you and the rest of the Trump haters. it surely is winning over any new voters and the indies were satisfied with the mueller findings

You mean like when Hillary smashed her cell phones and wiped her servers clean?

[Unregistered]

Ok...but let’s start with this. Why do democrats think seeing trump’s tax return is important? I personally think all candidates should be required to, however, it isn’t required and thus none of their business.

Nyc real estate is. Tough business. I did some work for a guy named Stephen Ross. Google him. Billionaire now. Changed the nyc skyline. Ambitious projects. Was sued by the justice dept, had properties go bk, has so many losses on his tax returns in the 80s that I doubt he had a double digit effective tax rate for two decades. My point is, trump was just the most brash. There were plenty of others in nyc, let alone guyslike reichmann and tishman who also did it on the global scene.

[Unregistered]

Ok...but let’s start with this. Why do democrats think seeing trump’s tax return is important? I personally think all candidates should be required to, however, it isn’t required and thus none of their business.

When the candidate may benefit financially from their from their position in office the voters have a right to know about those interests. When the candidate may be lying about their income, wealth, charitable donations and debts the voters have the right to know about the lies. When the candidate may have lied to the IRS about foreign sources of income or bank accounts, the IRS has every right to know about it.

[Unregistered]

Ok...but let’s start with this. Why do democrats think seeing trump’s tax return is important? I personally think all candidates should be required to, however, it isn’t required and thus none of their business.

But the Law gives the DEM congress the right to see them... oversight by Congress is part of their business...

[Unregistered]

When the candidate may benefit financially from their from their position in office the voters have a right to know about those interests. When the candidate may be lying about their income, wealth, charitable donations and debts the voters have the right to know about the lies. When the candidate may have lied to the IRS about foreign sources of income or bank accounts, the IRS has every right to know about it.

Like how everyone elected to Congress shows up with no $$$ but ends up a millionaire along with most of their family
That financial benefit? Now all of a sudden you’re worried about it- that’s funny

[Unregistered]

But the Law gives the DEM congress the right to see them... oversight by Congress is part of their business...

Not for the purpose of disclosing the information it doesn’t
And as soon as they get it they will leak it which is against the law
Dems definition of obstruction
If you don’t help us destroy you for made up chit , you are obstructing justice

[Unregistered]

When the candidate may benefit financially from their from their position in office the voters have a right to know about those interests. When the candidate may be lying about their income, wealth, charitable donations and debts the voters have the right to know about the lies. When the candidate may have lied to the IRS about foreign sources of income or bank accounts, the IRS has every right to know about it.

The IRS already has the returns- probably audited trump every year
They haven’t flagged him- the IRS has investigators , police powers and under the Obama admin got a ****load of ammo
Again this is just more of the same to embarrass and harass -

[Unregistered]

Tiutaft

Not for the purpose of disclosing the information it doesn’t
And as soon as they get it they will leak it which is against the law
Dems definition of obstruction
If you don’t help us destroy you for made up chit , you are obstructing justice

Ahhh...

Line 1: You impute motive without evidence....
Line 2: You further determine intent without evidence
Line 3: You then blame the opposition without evidence

Conclusion: You are a Republickass

[Unregistered]

The IRS already has the returns- probably audited trump every year
They haven’t flagged him- the IRS has investigators , police powers and under the Obama admin got a ****load of ammo
Again this is just more of the same to embarrass and harass -

Yes the IRS has the returns....and yes Congress has the legal right to see them ... time to lock Mnuchin up ... (and then watch him squeal like the pig he is)

[Unregistered]

When the candidate may benefit financially from their from their position in office the voters have a right to know about those interests. When the candidate may be lying about their income, wealth, charitable donations and debts the voters have the right to know about the lies. When the candidate may have lied to the IRS about foreign sources of income or bank accounts, the IRS has every right to know about it.

Dumb response. So looking at his return may show he lied about foreign bank accounts? How? If he didn’t list a foreign bank account, how will you find it on his tax return? Did you list your bank accounts on your tax return? It isn’t required and is not an input into a tax return. There is a line that asks if you have a foreign account, but if it isn’t populated, then the government needs to already have information that he has an account. So if democrats have the foreign bank account. State that and say the purpose is to collaborate with his tax return.

Debt isn’t an input on a tax return. Interest is, but not debt. You will not be able to determine the debt level

You want to investigate the president because he may have lied about his charitable contributions? Might as well drag every tax payer in.

[Unregistered]

Dumb response. So looking at his return may show he lied about foreign bank accounts? How? If he didn’t list a foreign bank account, how will you find it on his tax return? Did you list your bank accounts on your tax return? It isn’t required and is not an input into a tax return. There is a line that asks if you have a foreign account, but if it isn’t populated, then the government needs to already have information that he has an account. So if democrats have the foreign bank account. State that and say the purpose is to collaborate with his tax return.

Debt isn’t an input on a tax return. Interest is, but not debt. You will not be able to determine the debt level

You want to investigate the president because he may have lied about his charitable contributions? Might as well drag every tax payer in.

Oh no. The anti trump guy won’t be posting for a while

https://nypost.com/2019/05/12/connec...-donald-trump/