Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
    Now that is what we would call an optimistic Republickass... no lie to brazen enough to believe... fortunately we are going to be spared from the imposition of a tRUMPian Gulag...
    Rumor has it he is going to reopen tRUMP University ... now that he has found a population of dolts who will believe anything and who like to pay for education...
    Smart people are getting richer and dumb people are getting poorer.....we must fix this and take from the smart and give it to the dumb

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ther...e-jackson.html

    Comment


      Jussie Smollett. Hires two black guys to assault him and then blames two white guys with MAGA hats. Then hires a white guy to save his azz. Can’t make this stuff up.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
        You have seen the report .... too funny.... your head is so far up tRUMP's ass that you can see Putin's dick !! Look carefully at what is tattooed on it "Дональду с любовью,Владимир"
        Except everything the poster said is true. Lol. Kavanaugh accuser? Vanished. Jussie? Headed to jail. Mueller report? A giant nothingburger. McCabe? An admitted liar. Comey? Soon the be charged for lying to Congress. Where there is smoke, there’s fire. The Dems have been caught out. And all they can do is trot out socialist candidates. They’re more closely aligned with Russia than Trump. Pathetic.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
          Jussie Smollett. Hires two black guys to assault him and then blames two white guys with MAGA hats. Then hires a white guy to save his azz. Can’t make this stuff up.
          Jussie will be a finalist for time man of the year. Me personally, I would put the kid who stood his ground vs the fake veteran american Indian once the Washington post settles the case out of court and makes him a millionaire. Or Kavanaugh for standing up to liberal attacks, or trump again for his fight against illegal immigration and his protection of the American people vs the invasion at the southern border. Unlike carter, he addressed the issue. By the way, carter sent the marines to Florida as a result. The difference is carter penned the Cubans up in make shift prisons. Now we have to build first class shelters with schools and give free medical care. Cubans rioted and broke free. 20 percent of the refugees from Cuba were crimminals, probably similar to the amount of Central American crimminals hiding in the caravans. Only good thing that came out of the Mariel boatlift was the movie Scarface. Classic. Waiting for someone to come out with the ms13 movie

          https://www.foxnews.com/world/25-ms-...-officials-say
          https://www.9news.com/article/news/c...3-d8f946a78948
          https://foxsanantonio.com/news/local...-in-eagle-pass

          That’s just this week.....

          Comment


            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
            Except everything the poster said is true. Lol. Kavanaugh accuser? Vanished. Jussie? Headed to jail. Mueller report? A giant nothingburger. McCabe? An admitted liar. Comey? Soon the be charged for lying to Congress. Where there is smoke, there’s fire. The Dems have been caught out. And all they can do is trot out socialist candidates. They’re more closely aligned with Russia than Trump. Pathetic.
            Kavanaugh's accuser disappeared because of threats against her life and her family. Another white domestic terrorist was yesterday was a huge cache of weapons, intent on mass murder against Dems, members of the "left" media SCOTUS judges he thought were against Trump. Trump's "enemy of the people" campaign against the media is ramping up as he stresses about Cohen testifying and the Mueller report coming out soon. The Mueller report is only one piece of the investigative pie. Even if it shows Trump didn't knowingly take help from Russia there is no doubt Russia interfered. To date very few funds allocated to combat Russia's attacks have been used. The investigation has also opened up 20 cans of worms regarding his merry band of liars, illegal use of campaign funds, sordid affairs, possible tax and financial fraud, owing the Saudis and Russians millions.

            The Dems are a mess, but it's still early. Many will drop out in a few months, unable to gain traction and raise money. A more centrist candidate like Biden or Bloomberg is very electable. A few Republicans are toying with going against Trump, one has already filed. A decently strong independent candidate (not Schultz, he's as full as white toast) could split votes on both sides

            Comment


              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
              Jussie will be a finalist for time man of the year. Me personally, I would put the kid who stood his ground vs the fake veteran american Indian once the Washington post settles the case out of court and makes him a millionaire. Or Kavanaugh for standing up to liberal attacks, or trump again for his fight against illegal immigration and his protection of the American people vs the invasion at the southern border. Unlike carter, he addressed the issue. By the way, carter sent the marines to Florida as a result. The difference is carter penned the Cubans up in make shift prisons. Now we have to build first class shelters with schools and give free medical care. Cubans rioted and broke free. 20 percent of the refugees from Cuba were crimminals, probably similar to the amount of Central American crimminals hiding in the caravans. Only good thing that came out of the Mariel boatlift was the movie Scarface. Classic. Waiting for someone to come out with the ms13 movie

              https://www.foxnews.com/world/25-ms-...-officials-say
              https://www.9news.com/article/news/c...3-d8f946a78948
              https://foxsanantonio.com/news/local...-in-eagle-pass

              That’s just this week.....
              Good the police are doing their jobs. You do know that MS-13 has been around for decades and many member are US born? A wall won't change that. Nor will it stop home grown terrorists - check out the white guy who wanted to kill Democratic members of Congress and members of the press https://news.yahoo.com/u-arrests-coa...000227422.html

              Just this week -

              A Sikh is attacked because something thought he was Muslim - hate crime https://apnews.com/bfb9112c5f594ca493c21148e9cca4d9

              Utah man arrested for wanting to kill Mexicans https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...es/2934909002/

              Anti Semitism on the rise in NYC + the Pittsburg attack https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/18/n...-new-york.html

              Hate crimes up in the US https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2018/11/...theres-reason/

              More and more hate groups, nearly all white supremacists https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nu...D=ansmsnnews11

              Two Spanish speaking Americans are stopped by Border patrol literally just because they were speaking Spanish. That is not probable cause, it's racial profiling. https://www.vox.com/2019/2/14/182252...ontana-spanish

              Comment


                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                Except everything the poster said is true. Lol. Kavanaugh accuser? Vanished. Jussie? Headed to jail. Mueller report? A giant nothingburger. McCabe? An admitted liar. Comey? Soon the be charged for lying to Congress. Where there is smoke, there’s fire. The Dems have been caught out. And all they can do is trot out socialist candidates. They’re more closely aligned with Russia than Trump. Pathetic.
                Thank you Comrade for your clip from Pravda...will pass it along to Comrade tRUMPski

                Comment


                  Discussions about Massachusetts soccer

                  Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                  The fact that didn’t provide any proof in that embarrassment of a post
                  I on the other hand have plenty of proof of collusion
                  All done by the Clinton campaign
                  100 or so millions in donations to the foundation
                  Steele dossier
                  Speaking fees
                  A little uranium purchase
                  So this was the question:

                  You can't be serious. You mean there is no evidence that the trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government and those acting on its behalf to help Trump win the election through illegal conduct employed by those acting on behalf of or in coordination with the Russian government? None?

                  And your silly response says that I didn't provide proof. The proof is everywhere:

                  -Donald Trump lying for over a year incessantly to the American people that neither he nor anyone in his campaign had any dealings with Russian.

                  -Donald Trump then admitting that he actually had a signed letter of intent for a Russia project and Guliani says those negotiations continued through the elections.

                  -Donald Trump denying that he had any knowledge of the June meeting downstairs from his office even after the meeting, and then admitting that he wrote the phony adoption excuse on his flight from his meeting with Brother Vladimir

                  -Jr. denying and then admitting to the same when the idiots emails became public

                  -Manaford, his campaign chair, meeting with Russian agents to, among other things, share polling data.

                  -Roger Stone with direct contact with Wiki Leaks.

                  -Trump's own administration concluding uniformly that Russia meddled in the elections, committed a federal crime by stealing emails of Trump's opponent and releasing them strategically to help the Trump campaign.

                  -Trump standing up before the world to say that he trusts Putin over his own government's uniform conclusion that Russia meddled in our elections (and then Putin admitting that Russia did, in fact, meddle).

                  -Trump believing Putin that N. Korea doesn't have long range missiles capable of hitting the US over his own government's conclusion, which presented him with evidence that he refused to believe.

                  -Trump is Putin's lap dog. Never said one bad thing about Putin.

                  -The rest of the world knows all of this. Somehow Trump's "base" is willing to shut its eyes to all of it. You jokers had control of the house, the senate and the oval office for the past two years, yet you were not able to establish any of the alleged collusion that is listed in your post. Not one.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                    Good the police are doing their jobs. You do know that MS-13 has been around for decades and many member are US born? A wall won't change that. Nor will it stop home grown terrorists - check out the white guy who wanted to kill Democratic members of Congress and members of the press https://news.yahoo.com/u-arrests-coa...000227422.html

                    Just this week -

                    A Sikh is attacked because something thought he was Muslim - hate crime https://apnews.com/bfb9112c5f594ca493c21148e9cca4d9

                    Utah man arrested for wanting to kill Mexicans https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...es/2934909002/

                    Anti Semitism on the rise in NYC + the Pittsburg attack https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/18/n...-new-york.html

                    Hate crimes up in the US https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2018/11/...theres-reason/

                    More and more hate groups, nearly all white supremacists https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nu...D=ansmsnnews11

                    Two Spanish speaking Americans are stopped by Border patrol literally just because they were speaking Spanish. That is not probable cause, it's racial profiling. https://www.vox.com/2019/2/14/182252...ontana-spanish
                    You're not a very critical thinker, more like an MSM sponge. Doesn't take long, as usual, to debunk MSM garbage with real facts. Recorded hate crimes are up in 2017 partly because the number of agencies reporting them are up as noted by someone that is tracking this:

                    https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/18/r...me-statistics/

                    It was easy to confirm his findings:

                    Number of agencies participating in hate crimes recording by year according to the FBI:
                    2014: 15494
                    2015: 14997
                    2016: 15254
                    2017: 16149 (spike in 2017)

                    https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014/tables/table-12

                    Comment


                      Question Man Responds

                      Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                      You're not a very critical thinker, more like an MSM sponge. Doesn't take long, as usual, to debunk MSM garbage with real facts. Recorded hate crimes are up in 2017 partly because the number of agencies reporting them are up as noted by someone that is tracking this:

                      https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/18/r...me-statistics/

                      It was easy to confirm his findings:

                      Number of agencies participating in hate crimes recording by year according to the FBI:
                      2014: 15494
                      2015: 14997
                      2016: 15254
                      2017: 16149 (spike in 2017)

                      https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014/tables/table-12

                      So, you are stating, without hesitation, that the ONLY reason hate crimes are up is because more agencies are reporting them?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                        So this was the question:

                        You can't be serious. You mean there is no evidence that the trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government and those acting on its behalf to help Trump win the election through illegal conduct employed by those acting on behalf of or in coordination with the Russian government? None?

                        And your silly response says that I didn't provide proof. The proof is everywhere:

                        -Donald Trump lying for over a year incessantly to the American people that neither he nor anyone in his campaign had any dealings with Russian.

                        -Donald Trump then admitting that he actually had a signed letter of intent for a Russia project and Guliani says those negotiations continued through the elections.

                        -Donald Trump denying that he had any knowledge of the June meeting downstairs from his office even after the meeting, and then admitting that he wrote the phony adoption excuse on his flight from his meeting with Brother Vladimir

                        -Jr. denying and then admitting to the same when the idiots emails became public

                        -Manaford, his campaign chair, meeting with Russian agents to, among other things, share polling data.

                        -Roger Stone with direct contact with Wiki Leaks.

                        -Trump's own administration concluding uniformly that Russia meddled in the elections, committed a federal crime by stealing emails of Trump's opponent and releasing them strategically to help the Trump campaign.

                        -Trump standing up before the world to say that he trusts Putin over his own government's uniform conclusion that Russia meddled in our elections (and then Putin admitting that Russia did, in fact, meddle).

                        -Trump believing Putin that N. Korea doesn't have long range missiles capable of hitting the US over his own government's conclusion, which presented him with evidence that he refused to believe.

                        -Trump is Putin's lap dog. Never said one bad thing about Putin.

                        -The rest of the world knows all of this. Somehow Trump's "base" is willing to shut its eyes to all of it. You jokers had control of the house, the senate and the oval office for the past two years, yet you were not able to establish any of the alleged collusion that is listed in your post. Not one.
                        Not the OP but so easy to pick these apart:

                        -Donald Trump lying for over a year incessantly to the American people that neither he nor anyone in his campaign had any dealings with Russian.
                        What deal exactly did Trump have with Russia? If you mean discussing a hotel in Russia that is not a deal. I you think that is a deal then I presume you would give Trump full credit for the deal with North Korea?

                        -Donald Trump then admitting that he actually had a signed letter of intent for a Russia project and Guliani says those negotiations continued through the elections.
                        Let’s say there was a letter of intent. That is not a deal. Again you must love the North Korea deal with your logic.

                        -Donald Trump denying that he had any knowledge of the June meeting downstairs from his office even after the meeting, and then admitting that he wrote the phony adoption excuse on his flight from his meeting with Brother Vladimir
                        This is standard operating procedure for anyone in office or running a corporation for that matter. You always try to control the media narrative.

                        -Jr. denying and then admitting to the same when the idiots emails became public
                        Jr made them public. Had nothing to hide, still has nothing to hide and everyone that has gone public and discussed with Muller has corroborated Jr’s story.

                        -Manaford, his campaign chair, meeting with Russian agents to, among other things, share polling data.
                        Manafort had many dealings with Russia and former Russian republics prior to Trump even thinking about running. And sharing polling data is not a crime, most of it is public information.

                        -Roger Stone with direct contact with Wiki Leaks.
                        Yes, after Wiki leaks revealed what they had. Practically every news agency in the world had direct contacts with Wiki leaks after they revealed what they had. Not a crime and his not indicted for this supposed fact.

                        -Trump's own administration concluding uniformly that Russia meddled in the elections, committed a federal crime by stealing emails of Trump's opponent and releasing them strategically to help the Trump campaign.
                        Trump also agreed Russia meddled several times, would you like the clip?

                        -Trump standing up before the world to say that he trusts Putin over his own government's uniform conclusion that Russia meddled in our elections (and then Putin admitting that Russia did, in fact, meddle).
                        After this week with McCabe its clear to me why he would say that.

                        -Trump believing Putin that N. Korea doesn't have long range missiles capable of hitting the US over his own government's conclusion, which presented him with evidence that he refused to believe.

                        -Trump is Putin's lap dog. Never said one bad thing about Putin.
                        Except being tougher on Putin than Obama, other than that, yeah a lap dog.

                        -The rest of the world knows all of this. Somehow Trump's "base" is willing to shut its eyes to all of it. You jokers had control of the house, the senate and the oval office for the past two years, yet you were not able to establish any of the alleged collusion that is listed in your post. Not one.

                        I thought the left was supposed to represent the well-educated. You’re having a tough time.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                          So, you are stating, without hesitation, that the ONLY reason hate crimes are up is because more agencies are reporting them?
                          No, if you read carefully I said "party because" so they are up but not as much as the media makes it out to be. If you look at the data not only are more agencies reporting in 2017 but the US population that is covered by these additional agencies is larger as well.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                            Not the OP but so easy to pick these apart:

                            -Donald Trump lying for over a year incessantly to the American people that neither he nor anyone in his campaign had any dealings with Russian.
                            What deal exactly did Trump have with Russia? If you mean discussing a hotel in Russia that is not a deal. I you think that is a deal then I presume you would give Trump full credit for the deal with North Korea?

                            -Donald Trump then admitting that he actually had a signed letter of intent for a Russia project and Guliani says those negotiations continued through the elections.
                            Let’s say there was a letter of intent. That is not a deal. Again you must love the North Korea deal with your logic.

                            -Donald Trump denying that he had any knowledge of the June meeting downstairs from his office even after the meeting, and then admitting that he wrote the phony adoption excuse on his flight from his meeting with Brother Vladimir
                            This is standard operating procedure for anyone in office or running a corporation for that matter. You always try to control the media narrative.

                            -Jr. denying and then admitting to the same when the idiots emails became public
                            Jr made them public. Had nothing to hide, still has nothing to hide and everyone that has gone public and discussed with Muller has corroborated Jr’s story.

                            -Manaford, his campaign chair, meeting with Russian agents to, among other things, share polling data.
                            Manafort had many dealings with Russia and former Russian republics prior to Trump even thinking about running. And sharing polling data is not a crime, most of it is public information.

                            -Roger Stone with direct contact with Wiki Leaks.
                            Yes, after Wiki leaks revealed what they had. Practically every news agency in the world had direct contacts with Wiki leaks after they revealed what they had. Not a crime and his not indicted for this supposed fact.

                            -Trump's own administration concluding uniformly that Russia meddled in the elections, committed a federal crime by stealing emails of Trump's opponent and releasing them strategically to help the Trump campaign.
                            Trump also agreed Russia meddled several times, would you like the clip?

                            -Trump standing up before the world to say that he trusts Putin over his own government's uniform conclusion that Russia meddled in our elections (and then Putin admitting that Russia did, in fact, meddle).
                            After this week with McCabe its clear to me why he would say that.

                            -Trump believing Putin that N. Korea doesn't have long range missiles capable of hitting the US over his own government's conclusion, which presented him with evidence that he refused to believe.

                            -Trump is Putin's lap dog. Never said one bad thing about Putin.
                            Except being tougher on Putin than Obama, other than that, yeah a lap dog.

                            -The rest of the world knows all of this. Somehow Trump's "base" is willing to shut its eyes to all of it. You jokers had control of the house, the senate and the oval office for the past two years, yet you were not able to establish any of the alleged collusion that is listed in your post. Not one.

                            I thought the left was supposed to represent the well-educated. You’re having a tough time.
                            So when mueller's report comes out next week will you stand by it? Will you apologize for all the times you said he was colluding and putin's lapdog? Or will you start to trash mueller if after two years he has nothing on trump. For me, if it comes out and has real evidence of collusion I say we fry trump.

                            Comment


                              Merry Christmas from Donald Trump

                              Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                              Not the OP but so easy to pick these apart:

                              -Donald Trump lying for over a year incessantly to the American people that neither he nor anyone in his campaign had any dealings with Russian.
                              What deal exactly did Trump have with Russia? If you mean discussing a hotel in Russia that is not a deal. I you think that is a deal then I presume you would give Trump full credit for the deal with North Korea?

                              --You must be a lawyer since you are twisting my words. I said that he lied about having any "dealings" with Russia. You admit that Trump lied about this over and over. You do. You just say that a letter of intent is not a "deal." However you characterize a letter of intent, Trump was dealing with Russia. Dealing is "a personal connection or association with someone." Trump had that with Russia. Plus he and his associates had over 100 separate contacts (dealings) with Russia before the inauguration. So yes, as you admit, he lied over and over . As did those who had dealings with Russia on behalf of his campaign.
                              https://www.vox.com/2018/11/30/18119...als-statements


                              -Donald Trump then admitting that he actually had a signed letter of intent for a Russia project and Guliani says those negotiations continued through the elections.
                              Let’s say there was a letter of intent. That is not a deal. Again you must love the North Korea deal with your logic.

                              --Again, I didn't say he had a deal. I was quoting Donald Trump, who said he had no "dealings with Russia." The point here is that Trump denied even any contacts by him or his campaign with Russia. Why would he do such a thing considering that it was a blatant out and out lie?

                              -Donald Trump denying that he had any knowledge of the June meeting downstairs from his office even after the meeting, and then admitting that he wrote the phony adoption excuse on his flight from his meeting with Brother Vladimir
                              This is standard operating procedure for anyone in office or running a corporation for that matter. You always try to control the media narrative.

                              --Got it. Standard operating procedure to lie about every aspect of your dealings with Russia to the American people is just fine. As long as you control the media narrative. Got it. But absolutely an absurd excuse for the US President about a meeting he once claimed never happened.

                              -Jr. denying and then admitting to the same when the idiots emails became public
                              Jr made them public. Had nothing to hide, still has nothing to hide and everyone that has gone public and discussed with Muller has corroborated Jr’s story.

                              Umm, no. Actually, his story changed multiple times until the evidence was staring him right in his face.

                              https://www.npr.org/2017/07/09/53634...nfo-for-campai


                              -Manaford, his campaign chair, meeting with Russian agents to, among other things, share polling data.
                              Manafort had many dealings with Russia and former Russian republics prior to Trump even thinking about running. And sharing polling data is not a crime, most of it is public information.
                              --So you don't see this as any evidence of collusion? None? Meeting with government officials to share tightly guarded polling data? Wow.

                              -Roger Stone with direct contact with Wiki Leaks.
                              Yes, after Wiki leaks revealed what they had. Practically every news agency in the world had direct contacts with Wiki leaks after they revealed what they had. Not a crime and his not indicted for this supposed fact.
                              --Actually, having contact with Wiki Leaks to coordinate the release of stolen emails is a crime. But it is also evidence of collusion. We will find out more about this. And btw, while you admit that he did have direct contacts with Wiki Leaks, Stone has denied it. So there's that.

                              -Trump's own administration concluding uniformly that Russia meddled in the elections, committed a federal crime by stealing emails of Trump's opponent and releasing them strategically to help the Trump campaign.
                              Trump also agreed Russia meddled several times, would you like the clip?
                              --I've seen his tacit admissions and then denials. Tell me, does Trump agree that Russia meddled in the elections with the goal of helping Trump win the election? Let me know, because that's what his government concluded.

                              -Trump standing up before the world to say that he trusts Putin over his own government's uniform conclusion that Russia meddled in our elections (and then Putin admitting that Russia did, in fact, meddle).
                              After this week with McCabe its clear to me why he would say that.
                              --I see. You mean after McCabe revealed to McConnel, Ryan, Burr and Nunez that he was opening up an investigation on Trump and they had no objection, you would understand why Trump would side with Putin over every agency in his own government on this critical issue before the entire world? Got it. Makes perfect sense.

                              -Trump believing Putin that N. Korea doesn't have long range missiles capable of hitting the US over his own government's conclusion, which presented him with evidence that he refused to believe.

                              -Trump is Putin's lap dog. Never said one bad thing about Putin.
                              Except being tougher on Putin than Obama, other than that, yeah a lap dog.
                              --This is such a talking point. He resisted all of the sanctions imposed by Congress and was forced to relent after Congress passed veto-proof legislation. Then he refused to enforce the sanctions. Yeah, that's pretty tough of him.

                              -The rest of the world knows all of this. Somehow Trump's "base" is willing to shut its eyes to all of it. You jokers had control of the house, the senate and the oval office for the past two years, yet you were not able to establish any of the alleged collusion that is listed in your post. Not one.

                              I thought the left was supposed to represent the well-educated. You’re having a tough time.
                              My responses are above.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Unregistered View Post
                                So when mueller's report comes out next week will you stand by it? Will you apologize for all the times you said he was colluding and putin's lapdog? Or will you start to trash mueller if after two years he has nothing on trump. For me, if it comes out and has real evidence of collusion I say we fry trump.
                                You are a little behind the times. The House had concluded months ago there was no collusion. The Senate has concluded this month there was no collusion. Muller would have indicted someone already for collusion if there was collusion (or more accurately conspiracy). All they found was Stone contacting Wiki leaks after emails were made public along with thousands of news agencies trying to do the same thing at the same time. Basically Stone doing his job is what they found.

                                Comment

                                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                                Auto-Saved
                                x
                                Insert: Thumbnail Small Medium Large Fullsize Remove  
                                x
                                Working...
                                X