Originally posted by gargs
Originally posted by Anonymous
It's hard to do that when one of your main players records 15 turnovers and frequently blames his teammates for his poor decisions. It's also difficult to accomplish when the defense fails to clear the ball and gives too much space to the offense.
gargs as a high school player i think u should leave comments like that to high school players..... no offense but ur way too old to be badmouthing players specially the ones that play for your sons high school.
( and i belive sham had his own bundle of turn overs)
gargs as a high school player i think u should leave comments like that to high school players..... no offense but ur way too old to be badmouthing players specially the ones that play for your sons high school.
( and i belive sham had his own bundle of turn overs)
The trouble with our team in this game (besides the obvious of being without three starters), was trying to rush and force our offense too much (thereby giving the ball away to the other team), and not getting back on defense. Columbia is a good counter-attacking team and they took advantage.
The same player I criticized indirectly, I have praised directly many times this season. I don't think he should take offense because I was dis creet enough and because I care enough to speak my mind for his benefit. I thought the idea was the players want to become the best players they can be. At least that's the sincere attitude that someone would have if he truly wanted to get better. They would welcome such "criticism" with open arms, I would think.
This other notion that I should say nothing because I am not a high school player is fallacious logic. Says who? First of all I am not bad mouthing, I am attempting to help. Second of all, it is older and more experienced people who are more qualified to give constructive criticism based on their experience and observation. Perhaps you are too young to be talking to me in such a conceited and know it all fashion. You should be humble and understand there are many things in this lifetime that you have yet to learn. If someone's feathers get ruffled because I point out a contributing factor toward losing a game, then they should work on making their feathers more humble. If a team or player truly wants to get better and win then they would leave their false egos off the soccer field and welcome and consider my point of view for their own good. The choice is clearly between false ego and selfishness or considering a well wisher's frank observations for one's betterment. I guess it all depends what matters most to a person.
Comment